Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,220 studies31 sourcesUpdated 32 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-NDmedRxiv

Global Disparities in Vaccine Reimbursement for Adults Living with HIV: A Cross-Sectional Survey of 120 Countries

  1. 1Medical University of Warsaw, Medical Faculty English Division, Warsaw, Poland

Abstract

Objective: Adults living with HIV are at increased risk of vaccine-preventable infections, yet access to recommended vaccines varies globally. We evaluated national vaccination guidelines, public reimbursement, and on-site vaccination availability across countries with different income levels. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of HIV clinicians and experts representing 120 countries. The 26-item questionnaire assessed vaccination guidelines, recommendations, public reimbursement, and on-site vaccination availability. Countries were classified according to World Bank income group. Generalized linear mixed-effects models assessed routine recommendations, full reimbursement, and recommendation-reimbursement gaps by vaccine type and income group. Results: A total of 124 responses representing 120 countries were analyzed, including 38 low-/lower-middle-income (LIC/LMIC), 36 upper-middle-income (UMIC), and 50 high-income countries (HIC). HIV-specific national vaccination guidelines were reported by 37% of respondents, increasing from 18% in LIC/LMIC to 52% in HIC (p=0.026). Only 30% reported full public reimbursement for all recommended vaccines (13% LIC/LMIC, 28% UMIC, 44% HIC;p=0.007). Mixed-effects analyses showed significant differences in routine recommendations and full reimbursement by vaccine type and income group. The adjusted probability of routine recommendation was lower in LIC/LMIC than HIC countries (52.6% vs 77.6%; adjusted p=0.0013). Among recommended vaccines, more than 94% of influenza, pneumococcal, and hepatitis B vaccinations lacked full reimbursement in LIC/LMIC, based on adjusted estimates. Reimbursement gaps for HPV and herpes zoster vaccines remained substantial even in HIC. On-site vaccination was also less available in LIC/LMIC than in HIC (55% vs 78%; p=0.020). Conclusions: Significant income-related disparities persist in vaccination policy and implementation for adults living with HIV. Gaps between recommendations and financial access are particularly pronounced in lower-income settings, while HPV and herpes zoster reimbursement remains limited across all income groups. Expanding HIV-specific vaccination policies, improving public reimbursement, and integrating vaccination into routine HIV services are essential to improve access to recommended vaccines for this population.

Related

  1. Global disparities in the availability and reimbursement of systemic therapies for renal cell carcinoma: results of the International ARON-AID Survey.
    Yuksel Urun, Kannan Sridharan, Anca Zgura +139
    The oncologistPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Global burden, geographic and sex disparities, and projections to 2050 for salivary gland cancer across G20 countries: a GLOBOCAN 2024 analysis
    Wen Yang, Yuzhen Ma, Chunxia Shu
    Frontiers in OncologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textOncologyCrossrefDOAJ
  3. Global public perceptions of participation in pandemic and non-pandemic trials in the intensive care unit: a cross-sectional survey across 13 countries
    Leanne M. C. Hays, Alex C. Sherry, Attia Fatima +42
    TrialsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  4. Variation in public health reimbursement policies of ECT and rTMS across 28 European countries: A call for evidence-based policy reform from the ECNP Neuromodulation Network
    Nils Opel, Jovana Bjekić, Jérôme Brunelin +15
    Neuroscience AppliedPeer-reviewedCC BYFull text1 citedPsychiatry & mental healthHAL
  5. Within-country ethnic disparities in intimate partner violence against women and associated factors across 37 low- and middle-income countries
    Ning Ma, Guangyu Tong, Shaoru Chen +20
    BMC MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0General medicineCrossref
BibTeX
@misc{burzynski2026global,
  title = {{Global Disparities in Vaccine Reimbursement for Adults Living with HIV: A Cross-Sectional Survey of 120 Countries}},
  author = {E. Burzynski and O. Turkmen Recen and P. Velikov and A. Cordie and G. Zambrano and A. J. Rodriguez-Morales and M. Krone and O. Epaulard and Z. B. Harboe and J. Kowalska},
  howpublished = {medRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.10.30.26366946},
  url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.30.26366946v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Global Disparities in Vaccine Reimbursement for Adults Living with HIV: A Cross-Sectional Survey of 120 Countries
AU  - E. Burzynski
AU  - O. Turkmen Recen
AU  - P. Velikov
AU  - A. Cordie
AU  - G. Zambrano
AU  - A. J. Rodriguez-Morales
AU  - M. Krone
AU  - O. Epaulard
AU  - Z. B. Harboe
AU  - J. Kowalska
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/30
PB  - medRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.10.30.26366946
UR  - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.30.26366946v1
AB  - Objective: Adults living with HIV are at increased risk of vaccine-preventable infections, yet access to recommended vaccines varies globally. We evaluated national vaccination guidelines, public reimbursement, and on-site vaccination availability across countries with different income levels. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of HIV clinicians and experts representing 120 countries. The 26-item questionnaire assessed vaccination guidelines, recommendations, public reimbursement, and on-site vaccination availability. Countries were classified according to World Bank income group. Generalized linear mixed-effects models assessed routine recommendations, full reimbursement, and recommendation-reimbursement gaps by vaccine type and income group. Results: A total of 124 responses representing 120 countries were analyzed, including 38 low-/lower-middle-income (LIC/LMIC), 36 upper-middle-income (UMIC), and 50 high-income countries (HIC). HIV-specific national vaccination guidelines were reported by 37% of respondents, increasing from 18% in LIC/LMIC to 52% in HIC (p=0.026). Only 30% reported full public reimbursement for all recommended vaccines (13% LIC/LMIC, 28% UMIC, 44% HIC;p=0.007). Mixed-effects analyses showed significant differences in routine recommendations and full reimbursement by vaccine type and income group. The adjusted probability of routine recommendation was lower in LIC/LMIC than HIC countries (52.6% vs 77.6%; adjusted p=0.0013). Among recommended vaccines, more than 94% of influenza, pneumococcal, and hepatitis B vaccinations lacked full reimbursement in LIC/LMIC, based on adjusted estimates. Reimbursement gaps for HPV and herpes zoster vaccines remained substantial even in HIC. On-site vaccination was also less available in LIC/LMIC than in HIC (55% vs 78%; p=0.020). Conclusions: Significant income-related disparities persist in vaccination policy and implementation for adults living with HIV. Gaps between recommendations and financial access are particularly pronounced in lower-income settings, while HPV and herpes zoster reimbursement remains limited across all income groups. Expanding HIV-specific vaccination policies, improving public reimbursement, and integrating vaccination into routine HIV services are essential to improve access to recommended vaccines for this population.
ER  -