Global disparities in the availability and reimbursement of systemic therapies for renal cell carcinoma: results of the International ARON-AID Survey.
40 affiliations
- 1Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara 06620, Türkiye.
- 2Cancer Research Institute, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkiye.
- 3Department of Pharmacology & Therapeutics, College of Medicine & Health Sciences, Arabian Gulf University, Kingdom of Bahrain.
- 4Department of Obstetrics-Radiotherapy, Alexandru Trestioreanu Institute of Oncology, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
- 5Department of Internal Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan.
- 6Department of Clinical Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá, Colombia.
- 7Department of Medical Oncology, Bahrain Oncology Center, Muharraq, Bahrain.
- 8Department of Urology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Kawagoe, Saitama, Japan.
- 9Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
- 10Urologic Oncology, Champalimaud Clinical Center, Lisbon 1400-038, Portugal.
- 11Department of Medical Oncology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
- 12Oncocentro Ceará (Rede D'Or), Fortaleza, Brazil.
- 13Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
- 14Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Corazon Locsin Montelibano Memorial Regional Hospital, Bacolod 6100, Philippines.
- 15Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of St. La Salle, Bacolod 6100, Philippines.
- 16Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
- 17Department of Oncology, St. Claraspital, Basel, Switzerland.
- 18St. Clara Research, Basel, Switzerland.
- 19International University of Health and Welfare Hospital, 852 Hatakeda, Narita-shi, Chiba 286-8520, Japan.
- 20Finnish Medicines Agency, Tampere, Finland.
- 21Oncologia D'OR, Salvador, Brazil.
- 22Jiangsu Key Laboratory of New Drug Screening & Jiangsu Center for Pharmacodynamics Research and Evaluation, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 210009, China.
- 23Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group-LACOG, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
- 24Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
- 25Department of Radiation Oncology and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
- 26Department of Medical Oncology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu 632004, India.
- 27Centro Oncológico do Triângulo, Uberlândia, Brazil.
- 28Department of Nephrology, King Hamad American Mission Hospital, Kingdom of Bahrain.
- 29Department of Medical Oncology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Brussel, Belgium.
- 30Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
- 31ANIMI-Unidad de Tratamento Oncológico, Lages, SC, Brazil.
- 32Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood, KS, United States.
- 33Department of Medical Oncology, AORN "A. Cardarelli,"Naples, Italy.
- 34Immune Oncology Research Institute, 7 Nersisyan, Yerevan 0014, Armenia.
- 35Yeolyan Hematology and Oncology Center, Yerevan, Armenia.
- 36Yerevan State Medical University, Yerevan, Armenia.
- 37Medical Oncology Service, Bradford Hill, Santiago de Chile, Chile.
- 38Department of Oncology, Gyumri Medical Center, Gyumri, Armenia.
- 39Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
- 40Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain.
Abstract
Background
Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) represents a growing global health burden, with rising incidence and mortality worldwide. Despite major therapeutic advances, access to novel systemic treatments remains uneven across countries and regions.Methods
We conducted a cross-sectional, web-based international survey to assess the availability and reimbursement status of 20 innovative systemic therapies for RCC. Responses were collected from 144 clinicians, including medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, urologists, and nuclear medicine specialists, across 58 countries. Analyses examined associations between national income level, gross domestic product (GDP), and treatment availability.Findings
Thirty-six percent of the countries analyzed had at least 15 of the 20 therapies available. Full reimbursement for at least 15 of the selected innovative therapies was reported in six countries (10%), while 21 countries (36%) fully reimbursed 10-14 therapies and 13 countries (23%) reimbursed 1-9 therapies. In contrast, no full reimbursement for any of the assessed therapies was reported in 18 countries (31%). Higher national income level was significantly associated with greater availability of innovative therapies (Kruskal-Wallis test, P < .0001). Armenia (0.709), Greece (0.685), and Israel (0.666) exhibited the highest GDP-adjusted Drug Availability Index (DAI), whereas India (5.195), Nigeria (4.612), and Morocco (3.794) demonstrated the greatest number of available therapies per US$1000 of GDP per capita.Interpretation
Access to innovative systemic therapies for RCC remains highly unequal at the global level, with reimbursement posing a major barrier even where drugs are available. Internationally coordinated efforts addressing health policy, infrastructure, and equitable pricing are urgently required to ensure that advances in RCC treatment translate into improved outcomes for patients across diverse economic settings.
Related
- Global Disparities in Vaccine Reimbursement for Adults Living with HIV: A Cross-Sectional Survey of 120 Countries
- Availability and reimbursement of fixed-dose combination medicines for hypertension treatment in Central and Eastern Europe
- Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Access to Home‐Based Renal Replacement Therapies Among Incident End‐Stage Renal Disease Patients in the United States
- Global Disparities in Diagnostic and Therapeutic Strategies for Myocardial Infarction With Non-obstructive Coronary Arteries: An International Survey
- Systemic Therapies in Advanced Adrenocortical Carcinoma: Current Standards, Emerging Strategies, and Practical Considerations
BibTeX
@article{urun2026global,
title = {{Global disparities in the availability and reimbursement of systemic therapies for renal cell carcinoma: results of the International ARON-AID Survey.}},
author = {Yuksel Urun and Kannan Sridharan and Anca Zgura and Anas Zayed and Martin Ignacio Zapata Laguado and Tarkan Yetisyigit and Akihiro Yano and Mike Wenzel and Nuno Vau and Deniz Tural and Karine Trindade and Ben Tran and Frederic Ivan Leong Ting and Arnoud J Templeton and Hideki Takeshita and Kaisa Sunela and Vinicius Carrera Souza and Mopa Alina Sooro and Andrey Soares and Shankar Siva and Ashish Singh and Glauco Silveira and Shamik Shah and Emmanuel Seront and Fabio A Schutz and Maitê de Liz Vassen Schurmann and Timothy Schieber and Sarah Scagliarini and Amalya Sargsyan and Carlos Salinas Simonetti and Marine Rushanyan and Giandomenico Roviello and Alejo Rodriguez-Vida and Orion Erenhu Rodriguez Gonzalez and Robin Roberts and Astrid A M Van der Veldt and Mimma Rizzo and Alessandro Rizzo and Alexandr Poprach and Alina Pirshtuk and Alvaro Pinto and Erin Pierce and Jose Mauricio Peñaloza and Martino Pedrani and Se Hoon Park and Ibukun Adewumi Okunade and Karen Flora Odounga and Julio Noriega and Edriss Noorzai and Maria Tereza Nieto Coronel and Jiri Navratil and Zin W Myint and Vladan Mutavdzic and Olivier Mukuku and Robert Mugarura and Fernando Sabino Marques Monteiro and Abdikarim Hussein Mohamed and Daniel Mmereki and Carlo Messina and Bohuslav Melichar},
journal = {The oncologist},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1093/oncolo/oyag397},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42836687},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Global disparities in the availability and reimbursement of systemic therapies for renal cell carcinoma: results of the International ARON-AID Survey.
AU - Yuksel Urun
AU - Kannan Sridharan
AU - Anca Zgura
AU - Anas Zayed
AU - Martin Ignacio Zapata Laguado
AU - Tarkan Yetisyigit
AU - Akihiro Yano
AU - Mike Wenzel
AU - Nuno Vau
AU - Deniz Tural
AU - Karine Trindade
AU - Ben Tran
AU - Frederic Ivan Leong Ting
AU - Arnoud J Templeton
AU - Hideki Takeshita
AU - Kaisa Sunela
AU - Vinicius Carrera Souza
AU - Mopa Alina Sooro
AU - Andrey Soares
AU - Shankar Siva
AU - Ashish Singh
AU - Glauco Silveira
AU - Shamik Shah
AU - Emmanuel Seront
AU - Fabio A Schutz
AU - Maitê de Liz Vassen Schurmann
AU - Timothy Schieber
AU - Sarah Scagliarini
AU - Amalya Sargsyan
AU - Carlos Salinas Simonetti
AU - Marine Rushanyan
AU - Giandomenico Roviello
AU - Alejo Rodriguez-Vida
AU - Orion Erenhu Rodriguez Gonzalez
AU - Robin Roberts
AU - Astrid A M Van der Veldt
AU - Mimma Rizzo
AU - Alessandro Rizzo
AU - Alexandr Poprach
AU - Alina Pirshtuk
AU - Alvaro Pinto
AU - Erin Pierce
AU - Jose Mauricio Peñaloza
AU - Martino Pedrani
AU - Se Hoon Park
AU - Ibukun Adewumi Okunade
AU - Karen Flora Odounga
AU - Julio Noriega
AU - Edriss Noorzai
AU - Maria Tereza Nieto Coronel
AU - Jiri Navratil
AU - Zin W Myint
AU - Vladan Mutavdzic
AU - Olivier Mukuku
AU - Robert Mugarura
AU - Fernando Sabino Marques Monteiro
AU - Abdikarim Hussein Mohamed
AU - Daniel Mmereki
AU - Carlo Messina
AU - Bohuslav Melichar
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/01
JO - The oncologist
DO - 10.1093/oncolo/oyag397
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42836687
AB - Background Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) represents a growing global health burden, with rising incidence and mortality worldwide. Despite major therapeutic advances, access to novel systemic treatments remains uneven across countries and regions.Methods We conducted a cross-sectional, web-based international survey to assess the availability and reimbursement status of 20 innovative systemic therapies for RCC. Responses were collected from 144 clinicians, including medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, urologists, and nuclear medicine specialists, across 58 countries. Analyses examined associations between national income level, gross domestic product (GDP), and treatment availability.Findings Thirty-six percent of the countries analyzed had at least 15 of the 20 therapies available. Full reimbursement for at least 15 of the selected innovative therapies was reported in six countries (10%), while 21 countries (36%) fully reimbursed 10-14 therapies and 13 countries (23%) reimbursed 1-9 therapies. In contrast, no full reimbursement for any of the assessed therapies was reported in 18 countries (31%). Higher national income level was significantly associated with greater availability of innovative therapies (Kruskal-Wallis test, P < .0001). Armenia (0.709), Greece (0.685), and Israel (0.666) exhibited the highest GDP-adjusted Drug Availability Index (DAI), whereas India (5.195), Nigeria (4.612), and Morocco (3.794) demonstrated the greatest number of available therapies per US$1000 of GDP per capita.Interpretation Access to innovative systemic therapies for RCC remains highly unequal at the global level, with reimbursement posing a major barrier even where drugs are available. Internationally coordinated efforts addressing health policy, infrastructure, and equitable pricing are urgently required to ensure that advances in RCC treatment translate into improved outcomes for patients across diverse economic settings.
SN - 1083-7159
SN - 1549-490X
ER -