Prevalence, Morphology, and Risk Factors of Mandibular Ramus Fractures: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
4 affiliations
- 1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria.
- 2Medical Faculty, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria.
- 3Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ludwig Maximilian-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
- 4Department of Prosthodontics, Sigmund Freud Private Universitiy Vienna (SFU), Vienna, Austria.
Abstract
Because mandibular ramus fractures represent a rare entity among the various fracture patterns of the mandible, the present study evaluated the prevalence, morphology, and risk factors associated with mandibular ramus fractures. The prevalence of mandibular ramus fractures was evaluated in patients diagnosed with mandibular fractures over 5 years. Along with epidemiologic data, fracture morphology, treatment modalities, and patient-related risk factors, such as gonial angle and third molar impaction, were assessed for the ramus fractures and compared with angle fractures. Out of 547 patients diagnosed with mandibular fractures, 15 (2.7%; 10 m/5 f) presented with ramus fractures. Patients with mandibular ramus fractures demonstrated a significantly higher rate of female patients (33.3% vs. 9.6%, p = 0.021) and multiple fracture patterns (66% vs. 40.9%, p = 0.042; OR 2.91) compared to those with angle fractures (115/547; 21%; 104 m/11 f). Regarding fracture morphology, 12/15 (80%) ramus fractures exhibited a vertical/oblique fracture line, while comminuted fractures were observed only in 3/15 (20%) patients. Road traffic accidents (RTAs) were the predominant etiology for ramus fractures (46.6%, p < 0.025) and served as a potent predictor for complex multiple fractures (OR = 6.48, p < 0.001). Although deeply impacted third molars were significantly less frequent in ramus fractures than in angle fractures (13.3% vs. 38.3%; p = 0.049), the mean gonial angle was wider in the ramus group (130.3° ± 7.2° vs. 127.4° ± 6.2°, p = 0.098). In contrast to maxilla-mandibular fixation (13.3%), open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) was the primary treatment modality (86.4%, p < 0.01); both yielded a high success rate without severe complications. A high gonial angle and the absence of deep third molar impaction structurally predispose the mandibular ramus to injury, particularly acting as predictors for complex fracture patterns during road traffic accidents (RTAs).
Related
- Factors associated with prolonged hospital stay in mandibular condylar fractures: a multicenter retrospective study in Indonesia.
- Preoperative prevalence and risk factors for thromboembolic events following tibial plateau fractures: a retrospective analysis of an underestimated risk.
- C-Shaped Root Canal Morphology in Mandibular Posterior Teeth-A Retrospective CBCT Study Based on Two Classification Systems.
- Factors associated with early puncture-site wound events after percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a retrospective cohort study
- Clinical Outcomes and Patient-Reported Satisfaction with Functional Orthodontic Treatment of Mandibular Condylar Process Fractures
BibTeX
@article{krennmair2026prevalence,
title = {{Prevalence, Morphology, and Risk Factors of Mandibular Ramus Fractures: A Retrospective Cohort Study.}},
author = {Stefan Krennmair and Simon Kienberger and Matthias Angerer and Lukas Postl and Gerald Krennmair and Michael Malek},
journal = {Clinical and experimental dental research},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1002/cre2.70458},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42956162},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Prevalence, Morphology, and Risk Factors of Mandibular Ramus Fractures: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
AU - Stefan Krennmair
AU - Simon Kienberger
AU - Matthias Angerer
AU - Lukas Postl
AU - Gerald Krennmair
AU - Michael Malek
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/01
JO - Clinical and experimental dental research
DO - 10.1002/cre2.70458
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42956162
AB - Because mandibular ramus fractures represent a rare entity among the various fracture patterns of the mandible, the present study evaluated the prevalence, morphology, and risk factors associated with mandibular ramus fractures. The prevalence of mandibular ramus fractures was evaluated in patients diagnosed with mandibular fractures over 5 years. Along with epidemiologic data, fracture morphology, treatment modalities, and patient-related risk factors, such as gonial angle and third molar impaction, were assessed for the ramus fractures and compared with angle fractures. Out of 547 patients diagnosed with mandibular fractures, 15 (2.7%; 10 m/5 f) presented with ramus fractures. Patients with mandibular ramus fractures demonstrated a significantly higher rate of female patients (33.3% vs. 9.6%, p = 0.021) and multiple fracture patterns (66% vs. 40.9%, p = 0.042; OR 2.91) compared to those with angle fractures (115/547; 21%; 104 m/11 f). Regarding fracture morphology, 12/15 (80%) ramus fractures exhibited a vertical/oblique fracture line, while comminuted fractures were observed only in 3/15 (20%) patients. Road traffic accidents (RTAs) were the predominant etiology for ramus fractures (46.6%, p < 0.025) and served as a potent predictor for complex multiple fractures (OR = 6.48, p < 0.001). Although deeply impacted third molars were significantly less frequent in ramus fractures than in angle fractures (13.3% vs. 38.3%; p = 0.049), the mean gonial angle was wider in the ramus group (130.3° ± 7.2° vs. 127.4° ± 6.2°, p = 0.098). In contrast to maxilla-mandibular fixation (13.3%), open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) was the primary treatment modality (86.4%, p < 0.01); both yielded a high success rate without severe complications. A high gonial angle and the absence of deep third molar impaction structurally predispose the mandibular ramus to injury, particularly acting as predictors for complex fracture patterns during road traffic accidents (RTAs).
SN - 2057-4347
ER -