Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,541 studies31 sourcesUpdated 35 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Cancers

WBRT Plus SIB in Patients with Brain Metastases: Association with Longer Overall Survival and Safety Outcomes in a Single-Center Retrospective Analysis

  1. 1Department of Radiation Oncology, Shenzhen People’s Hospital (The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology, The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University), Shenzhen 518020, China

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy, survival benefits, and safety of whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) alone versus WBRT combined with simultaneous integrated boost (WBRT+SIB) for patients with brain metastases. Methods: A total of 100 patients treated from 2017 to 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Tumor response was assessed per RECIST 1.1. Survival differences were compared using the Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test. Multivariate Cox regression and subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate the prognostic value and stability of WBRT+SIB. Results: The WBRT+SIB group exhibited numerically higher objective response and disease control rates without statistical significance. With a median follow-up of 31.0 months, WBRT+SIB significantly prolonged median overall survival (11.0 vs. 8.0 months, p = 0.011) and improved 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates. After adjusting for multiple confounders, WBRT+SIB independently reduced mortality risk (HR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.27–0.97, p = 0.039). Subgroup analyses were exploratory; therefore, consistent survival advantages across strata cannot be confirmed. No significant differences in acute, subacute, or late neurotoxicity, including radiation-induced brain necrosis, were found between the two groups. Conclusions: WBRT+SIB was associated with longer overall survival compared with WBRT alone, without a significant increase in the incidence of radiotherapy-related adverse events. Although ORR and DCR were numerically higher in the WBRT+SIB group, these differences were not statistically significant. Given the limitations of this exploratory study, these findings should be considered hypothesis-generating and require validation in prospective randomized trials.

Related

  1. Peripheral immune-inflammatory markers associated with intracranial progression-free survival after Gamma Knife radiosurgery in patients with non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases: a retrospective cohort study.
    Wei Han, Hualin Wei, Ting Zeng +3
    Frontiers in medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCPMC
  2. Pretreatment Body Composition and Its Association with Pathologic Complete Response and Survival in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Erhan Tükel, Süleyman Özkan Aksoy, Ali İbrahim Sevinç +9
    Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Clinical Performance and Survival Outcomes of All-on-4 Full-Arch Implant-Supported Prostheses in Patients With a Completely Edentulous Arch: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Jay Gohil, Mohammed Taslim Fathima, Dilip Chakravarthy +3
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. The Effect of Fine (PM2.5) and Coarse (PM10-2.5) Particulate Matter on Survival Outcomes in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study in a Northern Thailand Tertiary Care Center.
    Weerachai Watcharatsiriyuth, Phakhinee Leesirisopha, Pichit Sittitrai +4
    Journal of clinical medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPharmacology & toxicologyEurope PMC
  5. Real-World Management and Survival Outcomes in Patients with Primary or Recurrent Retroperitoneal Liposarcoma: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study
    Atsuhiro Kijima, Nobuki Furubayashi, Takahito Negishi +1
    CancersPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0OncologyCrossref
BibTeX
@article{tang2026wbrt,
  title = {{WBRT Plus SIB in Patients with Brain Metastases: Association with Longer Overall Survival and Safety Outcomes in a Single-Center Retrospective Analysis}},
  author = {Zibo Tang and Guixiang Liao and Juan Fan},
  journal = {Cancers},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/cancers18203320},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/18/20/3320},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - WBRT Plus SIB in Patients with Brain Metastases: Association with Longer Overall Survival and Safety Outcomes in a Single-Center Retrospective Analysis
AU  - Zibo Tang
AU  - Guixiang Liao
AU  - Juan Fan
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/15
JO  - Cancers
DO  - 10.3390/cancers18203320
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/18/20/3320
AB  - Objective: To compare the efficacy, survival benefits, and safety of whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) alone versus WBRT combined with simultaneous integrated boost (WBRT+SIB) for patients with brain metastases. Methods: A total of 100 patients treated from 2017 to 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Tumor response was assessed per RECIST 1.1. Survival differences were compared using the Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test. Multivariate Cox regression and subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate the prognostic value and stability of WBRT+SIB. Results: The WBRT+SIB group exhibited numerically higher objective response and disease control rates without statistical significance. With a median follow-up of 31.0 months, WBRT+SIB significantly prolonged median overall survival (11.0 vs. 8.0 months, p = 0.011) and improved 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates. After adjusting for multiple confounders, WBRT+SIB independently reduced mortality risk (HR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.27–0.97, p = 0.039). Subgroup analyses were exploratory; therefore, consistent survival advantages across strata cannot be confirmed. No significant differences in acute, subacute, or late neurotoxicity, including radiation-induced brain necrosis, were found between the two groups. Conclusions: WBRT+SIB was associated with longer overall survival compared with WBRT alone, without a significant increase in the incidence of radiotherapy-related adverse events. Although ORR and DCR were numerically higher in the WBRT+SIB group, these differences were not statistically significant. Given the limitations of this exploratory study, these findings should be considered hypothesis-generating and require validation in prospective randomized trials.
SN  - 2072-6694
ER  -