Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,161 studies31 sourcesUpdated 45 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYFrontiers in aging neuroscience

Interaction of sex and insulin resistance with cognitive impairment in community-dwelling middle-aged and older adults

  1. 1Division of Population Health Research, Department of Precision Medicine, Korea National Institute of Health , , ,
  2. 2Department of Preventive Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine , ,

Abstract

Introduction: Cognitive impairment is a major global health challenge. However, whether sex and age interactively varies the association between insulin resistance and cognitive impairment remains unclear. This cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate the association between insulin resistance and cognitive impairment and identify sex- and age-specific interactions in community-dwelling adults.

Methods: The study involved 3,898 participants (aged 54–86 years) from the Ansan-Ansung cohort of the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study (2017–2018). Insulin resistance was assessed via Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR), with participants dichotomized by the median (1.97). Cognitive impairment was defined as a score of ≤23 on the Korean Mini-Mental State Examination score. Multivariable logistic regression was applied to examine the interaction and stratified effects of sex and age (≥65 vs. <65 years) on the insulin resistance–cognitive impairment association.

Results: Among 3,898 participants (mean age 66.6 years; 55.5% women), 635 (16.3%) had cognitive impairment. A significant interaction was observed between sex and HOMA-IR (p = 0.04), whereas the interaction for age was not significant (p = 0.17). In stratified analyses, higher HOMA-IR was significantly associated with cognitive impairment exclusively in women aged ≥65 years (OR 1.37; 95% CI 1.02–1.84; p = 0.04).

Conclusion: Higher insulin resistance is a significant modifiable factor for cognitive impairment, specifically in women aged ≥65 years. These exploratory findings suggest potential sex-related differences in the metabolic-cognitive association, underscoring the importance of sex-specific metabolic management starting from midlife to help preserve cognitive health in later life.

Related

  1. Associations of physical function and multimorbidity with cognitive impairment in community-dwelling Chinese octogenarians
    Sensen Bian, Chengyao Tong, Fanli Meng +5
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthCrossref
  2. Pre-implementation barriers and facilitators to implementing a physical activity guideline for community-dwelling older adults with mild cognitive impairment: a qualitative stakeholder study
    Zi Tian, Shi Zhang, Xinli Ni +8
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  3. Neighborhood socioeconomic status and environmental burden show diverging associations with cognitive impairment in community-dwelling older adults
    K. M. Bonta, E. Corbett, M. K. Alemu +28
    medRxivPreprintCC BY-NDFull textPsychiatry & mental healthmedRxiv
  4. Identifying Mild Cognitive Impairment from Routinely Collected Physical, Functional and Psychosocial Measures in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Comparative Machine-Learning and Regression Modelling Study in the Northern Japanese ORANGE Registry.
    Ayuto Kodama, Takako Ohnuma, Kana Sasaki +5
    Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textPsychiatry & mental healthEurope PMC
  5. The Mediating Effect of Sleep Quality on the Relationship Between Frailty and Cognitive Impairment Among Community‐Dwelling Older Adults: A Cross‐Sectional Study
    Lixia Chen, Xiaomei Liu, Lipei Yao +7
    Nursing openPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{kim2026interaction,
  title = {{Interaction of sex and insulin resistance with cognitive impairment in community-dwelling middle-aged and older adults}},
  author = {Jung Sook Kim and Byung Chul Chun and Joong-Yeon Lim},
  journal = {Frontiers in aging neuroscience},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fnagi.2026.1889416},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13719425},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Interaction of sex and insulin resistance with cognitive impairment in community-dwelling middle-aged and older adults
AU  - Jung Sook Kim
AU  - Byung Chul Chun
AU  - Joong-Yeon Lim
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/16
JO  - Frontiers in aging neuroscience
DO  - 10.3389/fnagi.2026.1889416
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13719425
AB  - Introduction: Cognitive impairment is a major global health challenge. However, whether sex and age interactively varies the association between insulin resistance and cognitive impairment remains unclear. This cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate the association between insulin resistance and cognitive impairment and identify sex- and age-specific interactions in community-dwelling adults.  Methods: The study involved 3,898 participants (aged 54–86 years) from the Ansan-Ansung cohort of the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study (2017–2018). Insulin resistance was assessed via Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR), with participants dichotomized by the median (1.97). Cognitive impairment was defined as a score of ≤23 on the Korean Mini-Mental State Examination score. Multivariable logistic regression was applied to examine the interaction and stratified effects of sex and age (≥65 vs. <65 years) on the insulin resistance–cognitive impairment association.  Results: Among 3,898 participants (mean age 66.6 years; 55.5% women), 635 (16.3%) had cognitive impairment. A significant interaction was observed between sex and HOMA-IR (p = 0.04), whereas the interaction for age was not significant (p = 0.17). In stratified analyses, higher HOMA-IR was significantly associated with cognitive impairment exclusively in women aged ≥65 years (OR 1.37; 95% CI 1.02–1.84; p = 0.04).  Conclusion: Higher insulin resistance is a significant modifiable factor for cognitive impairment, specifically in women aged ≥65 years. These exploratory findings suggest potential sex-related differences in the metabolic-cognitive association, underscoring the importance of sex-specific metabolic management starting from midlife to help preserve cognitive health in later life.
SN  - 1663-4365
ER  -