Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,067 studies31 sourcesUpdated 36 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Polymers

Effects of Emulsifier and Lubricant Formulation on Basalt Fiber Sizing Emulsions and Fiber Performance

  1. 1Basalt Fiber and Composite Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, School of Modern Industry for Basalt Fiber Composite Materials, Dazhou Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Fiber Materials, Sichuan University of Arts and Science, Dazhou 635000, China
  2. 2School of Chemistry and Environmental Engineering, Sichuan University of Science and Engineering, Zigong 643000, China
  3. 3Dazhou Market Supervision and Administration Bureau, Dazhou 635000, China

Abstract

Basalt fibers are prone to friction-induced damage during drawing and processing, while sizing emulsion properties significantly affect coating uniformity and fiber protection. This study aimed to optimize basalt fiber sizing formulations by evaluating the effects of emulsifier and lubricant combinations on emulsion characteristics and fiber performance. An industrial sizing formulation was selected as the reference, and three nonionic emulsifiers, namely poly(ethylene glycol) dibasic acid diester (DAPE), poly(ethylene oxide)-poly(propylene oxide) block copolymer (L44) and sorbitan monolaurate (S20) with two lubricants including polyoxyethylene esters of saturated (M) and unsaturated fatty acids (N) were investigated using independent L9(33) orthogonal experiments. A total of 27 formulations were prepared and evaluated based on solids content, viscosity, particle size, centrifugal stability, and surface tension. Six optimized formulations were further validated through fiber drawing tests. The results showed that sizing performance was controlled by the synergistic effects of emulsifier type, dosage, and lubricant ratio. Compared with the original sizing, the optimized formulations increased single-filament tensile strength by 4.46–20.82% and yarn breaking strength by 10.87–34.78%, with RA-1 (1.8% DAPE, 1.0% M, 1.6% N) exhibiting the best performance. After acid exposure, the optimized formulations maintained higher absolute yarn breaking strength than O-2, although relative strength retention varied only slightly among formulations. In contrast, alkaline exposure caused substantial strength loss, with retention rates of 50.94–53.70% and no significant differences among formulations.

Related

  1. Curing regime controlled performance of basalt-modified alkali activated slag: phase composition, porosity profile, microstructure and compressive strength
    Musa A. Said, M. Ramadan, Fatma. M. Helmy +7
    RSC advancesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral chemistryEurope PMCPMC
  2. Tailoring the Performance Profiles of Polycarbonate-Based Engineering Blends Through Formulation and Compatibilization
    PolymersPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMaterials & polymersEurope PMC
  3. Three-dimensional printing of human scala tympani models: surface modification to reduce cochlear implant insertion forces with a physiological lubricant
    Margaud Rivière, Chloé Morice, Guillaume Tourrel +3
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textSystems & synthetic biologyMaterials & polymersHAL
  4. Thermoresponsive Amphiphilic Polymer Emulsifier for Low-Dosage, High-Stability Oil-Based Drilling Fluids
    Dapeng Zou, Jun Wang
    ACS omegaPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral chemistryEurope PMCCrossref
  5. Synergistic collaboration between an emulsifier, surfactant and penetrant for rapid low-shear emulsification to enhance heavy-oil recovery
    Jingxin Ruan, Huohai Yang, Xin Chen +2
    RSC advancesPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral chemistryEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@article{yuan2026effects,
  title = {{Effects of Emulsifier and Lubricant Formulation on Basalt Fiber Sizing Emulsions and Fiber Performance}},
  author = {Jiajia Yuan and Junlan Li and Simin Zhuo and Jiahao Wu and Jianhui Wu and Like Zou and Yuanfang Deng and Chuan Lai},
  journal = {Polymers},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/polym18212645},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/18/21/2645},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Effects of Emulsifier and Lubricant Formulation on Basalt Fiber Sizing Emulsions and Fiber Performance
AU  - Jiajia Yuan
AU  - Junlan Li
AU  - Simin Zhuo
AU  - Jiahao Wu
AU  - Jianhui Wu
AU  - Like Zou
AU  - Yuanfang Deng
AU  - Chuan Lai
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/25
JO  - Polymers
DO  - 10.3390/polym18212645
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/18/21/2645
AB  - Basalt fibers are prone to friction-induced damage during drawing and processing, while sizing emulsion properties significantly affect coating uniformity and fiber protection. This study aimed to optimize basalt fiber sizing formulations by evaluating the effects of emulsifier and lubricant combinations on emulsion characteristics and fiber performance. An industrial sizing formulation was selected as the reference, and three nonionic emulsifiers, namely poly(ethylene glycol) dibasic acid diester (DAPE), poly(ethylene oxide)-poly(propylene oxide) block copolymer (L44) and sorbitan monolaurate (S20) with two lubricants including polyoxyethylene esters of saturated (M) and unsaturated fatty acids (N) were investigated using independent L9(33) orthogonal experiments. A total of 27 formulations were prepared and evaluated based on solids content, viscosity, particle size, centrifugal stability, and surface tension. Six optimized formulations were further validated through fiber drawing tests. The results showed that sizing performance was controlled by the synergistic effects of emulsifier type, dosage, and lubricant ratio. Compared with the original sizing, the optimized formulations increased single-filament tensile strength by 4.46–20.82% and yarn breaking strength by 10.87–34.78%, with RA-1 (1.8% DAPE, 1.0% M, 1.6% N) exhibiting the best performance. After acid exposure, the optimized formulations maintained higher absolute yarn breaking strength than O-2, although relative strength retention varied only slightly among formulations. In contrast, alkaline exposure caused substantial strength loss, with retention rates of 50.94–53.70% and no significant differences among formulations.
SN  - 2073-4360
ER  -