Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,625 studies31 sourcesUpdated 9 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0The European Journal of Public Health

Public health at risk in planning practice: HIA guidance must be strengthened in Norway

Abstract

Background: Health impact assessment (HIA) is a key instrument for operationalizing Health in All Policies in municipal planning and decision-making. While international research has identified many challenges related to HIA practice, knowledge regarding the implementation of HIA and associated challenges in Norwegian municipalities remain limited. To support the Norwegian Directorate of Health in making HIA a more user-friendly tool, this study aimed to explore current municipal HIA practices, and the challenges encountered within Norway.

Methods: A qualitative study was undertaken to gain in-depth insights into municipal HIA practices and associated challenges in Norway. Focus group interviews were conducted with stakeholders involved in HIA implementation and practice across administrative levels. The stakeholder groups included (1) public health coordinators and environmental health advisors, (2) planners and private consultants, (3) municipal chief medical officers, and (4) representatives from the County Governor and County Council.

Results: Stakeholders expressed a need for guidance on HIA in planning and decision-making. The findings revealed substantial variation in stakeholders’ knowledge of HIA, along with inconsistent use of existing methods and tools. Current guidelines were perceived as overly comprehensive yet insufficiently operational, prompting municipalities and consultants to develop ad hoc approaches. Furthermore, HIAs are rarely conducted for overarching municipal master plans or detailed zoning plans, and health considerations are weakly integrated into political decision-making and statutory impact assessments. Despite the prominence of health equity on the political agenda, impact assessment on health inequalities is largely absent.

Conclusions: We recommend establishing a national digital platform with a guidance framework consolidating and presenting HIA methods and tools to strengthen public health in future planning and decision-making.

Key messages: • Lack of clear, practical HIA guidance leads to ad hoc practice. weak political integration, and missing assessment of health inequalities in Norwegian planning.

• There is an urgent need for clear guidance, knowledge-based methods and practical tools to ensure systematic integration of HIA into municipal planning and decision-making at all levels.

Related

  1. Well-being Economy in Practice: A Translation Framework for Local Public Health and Sustainability
    C Winding, R Holm, C Bjørk Petersen +2
    The European Journal of Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textEnvironmental science & pollutionPMCEurope PMC
  2. GIS-based multi-criteria spatial decision support for equitable public toilet planning: mapping accessibility deficits, site suitability and priority intervention zones in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
    Esubalew Mulugeta Engda, Mesfin Herchema, Ziyen Achamyeleh Mekonnen +3
    City and Built EnvironmentPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEnvironmental science & pollutionDOAJ
  3. A spatial planning perspective on the global deployment of public electric vehicle charging stations
    Xiong Yang, Zhenhan Peng, Chengxiang Zhuge +4
    Cell Reports SustainabilityPeer-reviewedCC BYFull text1 citedEcologyEnvironmental science & pollutionDOAJ
  4. Open dumping and open burning of urban waste in developing-world cities: an under-recognized public health threat
    Gowthamkarthic Ravichandhiran, Soumya Agadi
    Social Determinants of HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textEnvironmental science & pollutionDOAJ
  5. Machine learning assessment of industrial corrosion and public health risks in data limited aquifers of Northeastern Algeria
    Mohamed Hamdy Eid, Omar Saeed, Péter Szűcs +10
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textHydrology & soilsCrossref
BibTeX
@article{nordbo2026public,
  title = {{Public health at risk in planning practice: HIA guidance must be strengthened in Norway}},
  author = {E C Nordbø and C Ihlebæk},
  journal = {The European Journal of Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1049},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1049},
  note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Public health at risk in planning practice: HIA guidance must be strengthened in Norway
AU  - E C Nordbø
AU  - C Ihlebæk
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - The European Journal of Public Health
DO  - 10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1049
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1049
AB  - Background: Health impact assessment (HIA) is a key instrument for operationalizing Health in All Policies in municipal planning and decision-making. While international research has identified many challenges related to HIA practice, knowledge regarding the implementation of HIA and associated challenges in Norwegian municipalities remain limited. To support the Norwegian Directorate of Health in making HIA a more user-friendly tool, this study aimed to explore current municipal HIA practices, and the challenges encountered within Norway.  Methods: A qualitative study was undertaken to gain in-depth insights into municipal HIA practices and associated challenges in Norway. Focus group interviews were conducted with stakeholders involved in HIA implementation and practice across administrative levels. The stakeholder groups included (1) public health coordinators and environmental health advisors, (2) planners and private consultants, (3) municipal chief medical officers, and (4) representatives from the County Governor and County Council.  Results: Stakeholders expressed a need for guidance on HIA in planning and decision-making. The findings revealed substantial variation in stakeholders’ knowledge of HIA, along with inconsistent use of existing methods and tools. Current guidelines were perceived as overly comprehensive yet insufficiently operational, prompting municipalities and consultants to develop ad hoc approaches. Furthermore, HIAs are rarely conducted for overarching municipal master plans or detailed zoning plans, and health considerations are weakly integrated into political decision-making and statutory impact assessments. Despite the prominence of health equity on the political agenda, impact assessment on health inequalities is largely absent.  Conclusions: We recommend establishing a national digital platform with a guidance framework consolidating and presenting HIA methods and tools to strengthen public health in future planning and decision-making.  Key messages: • Lack of clear, practical HIA guidance leads to ad hoc practice. weak political integration, and missing assessment of health inequalities in Norwegian planning.  • There is an urgent need for clear guidance, knowledge-based methods and practical tools to ensure systematic integration of HIA into municipal planning and decision-making at all levels.
SN  - 1101-1262
SN  - 1464-360X
ER  -