Time versus causal inferences: Action-outcome learning and prediction differentially shape the experience of causality and simultaneity
Abstract
The human brain is capable of recalibrating the perceived timing of events to achieve multisensory temporal grouping. For example, systematic delays separating an action and its subsequent outcome are reduced in perception, promoting the perception of simultaneity and recalibrating people's experience of causality. In this study we investigated whether sensorimotor recalibration depends on the ability to predict the specific outcome an action produces and whether this process differs for simultaneity and causal judgments. Across two experiments, we replicated the classic recalibration effect: repeated exposure to action-outcome delays shifted both simultaneity and causality windows toward the adapted delay. Outcome predictions did not modulate recalibration of simultaneity, but they impacted causal experience. Moreover, recalibration was overall larger for causal than simultaneity judgments, suggesting that causal perception relies more strongly on learned action-outcome contingencies than temporal perception alone.
Related
- How metapopulation dynamics shape evolutionary inferences from resurrection ecology
- Reference mapping and whole-genome alignment yield comparable phylogenomic inferences
- A deep dive into the fossil record of diving beetles (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae): Bayesian inferences elucidate their origin and pulsed diversification at the genus level
- Paleoenvironmental inferences from ungulate dental microwear texture analysis during the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic transition in Covalejos (northern Iberia)
- A literature-derived benchmarking database for single-ancestry polygenic risk score construction methods with spectral ranking inferences.
BibTeX
@article{bonnet2026time,
title = {{Time versus causal inferences: Action-outcome learning and prediction differentially shape the experience of causality and simultaneity}},
author = {Emmanuelle Bonnet and Thibault Gajdos Preuss and Guillaume S Masson and Andrea Desantis},
journal = {Acta Psychologica},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.107808},
url = {https://amu.hal.science/hal-05770142v1},
note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Time versus causal inferences: Action-outcome learning and prediction differentially shape the experience of causality and simultaneity
AU - Emmanuelle Bonnet
AU - Thibault Gajdos Preuss
AU - Guillaume S Masson
AU - Andrea Desantis
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/30
JO - Acta Psychologica
DO - 10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.107808
UR - https://amu.hal.science/hal-05770142v1
AB - The human brain is capable of recalibrating the perceived timing of events to achieve multisensory temporal grouping. For example, systematic delays separating an action and its subsequent outcome are reduced in perception, promoting the perception of simultaneity and recalibrating people's experience of causality. In this study we investigated whether sensorimotor recalibration depends on the ability to predict the specific outcome an action produces and whether this process differs for simultaneity and causal judgments. Across two experiments, we replicated the classic recalibration effect: repeated exposure to action-outcome delays shifted both simultaneity and causality windows toward the adapted delay. Outcome predictions did not modulate recalibration of simultaneity, but they impacted causal experience. Moreover, recalibration was overall larger for causal than simultaneity judgments, suggesting that causal perception relies more strongly on learned action-outcome contingencies than temporal perception alone.
SN - 0001-6918
SN - 1873-6297
ER -