Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,226 studies31 sourcesUpdated 31 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYTobacco induced diseases

Causal association between tobacco use, fibroblast growth factors, and pulmonary fibrosis: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study.

  1. 1Department of Respiratory MedicineMudanjiang Medical University, Affiliated Hongqi HospitalMudanjiangChina.
  2. 2Academic Affairs, Mudanjiang Medical University, Affiliated Hongqi HospitalMudanjiangChina.
  3. 3Community Health Service Center, Mudanjiang Medical University, Affiliated Hongqi HospitalMudanjiangChina.

Abstract

Introduction

Cigarette smoking is a risk factor for pulmonary fibrosis, but its underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) have been implicated in pulmonary fibrosis, yet their role in smoking-induced pulmonary fibrosis remains unclear. This study employed Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to investigate the causal relationships among FGFs, smoking, and pulmonary fibrosis.Methods

FGFs, smoking behavior, and pulmonary fibrosis data were collected from the IEU Open GWAS Project and the GWAS Catalog. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms were used for instrumental variable selection. Inverse-variance weighted (IVW) was the primary MR method, supplemented by Weighted mode, Weighted median, and MR-Egger regression. Sensitivity analyses included MR-PRESSO, MR-Egger, Cochran's Q, and leave-one-out.Results

IVW analysis showed that FGF10 (OR=0.74; 95% CI: 0.57-0.96, p=0.02), FGFR1 (OR=1.38; 95% CI: 1.04-1.84, p=0.03), and FGF19 (OR=0.78; 95% CI: 0.64-0.94, p=0.01) were statistically associated with pulmonary fibrosis risk. MR analysis of smoking behaviors as exposures and FGF10/FGFR1/FGF19 as outcomes showed no significant associations across all MR approaches. MR-Egger regression showed that horizontal multiplicity did not impact analysis except for FGFR3. MR-PRESSO did not identify any outliers. Sensitivity analysis showed that the association results were robust.Conclusions

FGF10, FGF19, and FGFR1 may be causally associated with pulmonary fibrosis. However, the MR analysis did not support a causal relationship between smoking and FGFs, suggesting that smoking contributes to pulmonary fibrosis independently of FGFs. This highlights the need for well-designed prospective studies to minimize bias in observational studies and for larger GWAS datasets to enhance future MR analyses.

Related

  1. Genetically predicted GLP-1R expression and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: A Mendelian randomization mediation study of JAKMIP3 and pulmonary function
    Gaofeng Liang, Dongchen Tian, Keyun Zhu +5
    The Journal of International Medical ResearchPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textGeneral medicinePMC
  2. The association between inflammation and pubertal development : Insights from NHANES and Mendelian randomization analyses
    Daye Chen, Lei Qian, Peng Mei +2
    MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. CAR T cells targeting fibroblast activation protein-α for the treatment of pulmonary fibrosis
    Ying Chen, Qian Zhang, Juanjuan Wu +9
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeneral medicineCrossref
  4. Adiponectin and Pulmonary Hypertension Risk: Mendelian Randomization and Receptor‐Side Genetic Evidence
    Ruixian Wu, Yiwen Zhang, Shuang Fu +3
    Pulmonary circulationPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCPMC
  5. The causal association between Celiac disease and Ankylosing spondylitis: a two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis.
    Meiqi Chen, Xiang Gao
    BMC rheumatologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{yu2026causal,
  title = {{Causal association between tobacco use, fibroblast growth factors, and pulmonary fibrosis: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study.}},
  author = {Renzhi Yu and Xiaoyue Han and Minghuan Wang and Yang Sun},
  journal = {Tobacco induced diseases},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.18332/tid/230999},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42923464},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Causal association between tobacco use, fibroblast growth factors, and pulmonary fibrosis: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study.
AU  - Renzhi Yu
AU  - Xiaoyue Han
AU  - Minghuan Wang
AU  - Yang Sun
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/21
JO  - Tobacco induced diseases
DO  - 10.18332/tid/230999
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42923464
AB  - Introduction  Cigarette smoking is a risk factor for pulmonary fibrosis, but its underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) have been implicated in pulmonary fibrosis, yet their role in smoking-induced pulmonary fibrosis remains unclear. This study employed Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to investigate the causal relationships among FGFs, smoking, and pulmonary fibrosis.Methods  FGFs, smoking behavior, and pulmonary fibrosis data were collected from the IEU Open GWAS Project and the GWAS Catalog. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms were used for instrumental variable selection. Inverse-variance weighted (IVW) was the primary MR method, supplemented by Weighted mode, Weighted median, and MR-Egger regression. Sensitivity analyses included MR-PRESSO, MR-Egger, Cochran's Q, and leave-one-out.Results  IVW analysis showed that FGF10 (OR=0.74; 95% CI: 0.57-0.96, p=0.02), FGFR1 (OR=1.38; 95% CI: 1.04-1.84, p=0.03), and FGF19 (OR=0.78; 95% CI: 0.64-0.94, p=0.01) were statistically associated with pulmonary fibrosis risk. MR analysis of smoking behaviors as exposures and FGF10/FGFR1/FGF19 as outcomes showed no significant associations across all MR approaches. MR-Egger regression showed that horizontal multiplicity did not impact analysis except for FGFR3. MR-PRESSO did not identify any outliers. Sensitivity analysis showed that the association results were robust.Conclusions  FGF10, FGF19, and FGFR1 may be causally associated with pulmonary fibrosis. However, the MR analysis did not support a causal relationship between smoking and FGFs, suggesting that smoking contributes to pulmonary fibrosis independently of FGFs. This highlights the need for well-designed prospective studies to minimize bias in observational studies and for larger GWAS datasets to enhance future MR analyses.
SN  - 2070-7266
SN  - 1617-9625
ER  -