EEG reflects subjective but not behavioral hearing in noise performance
Abstract
Ever since the first description of the “cocktail party problem” in 1953, much effort and progress have been devoted to understanding the factors that contribute to hearing difficulties in noise. Hearing difficulties in noise are multifold, and as such have been assessed using a range of objective and subjective measures. Here, we explored three distinct measures of hearing in noise: tone-in-noise (TIN) detection, speech reception threshold (SRT) in noise, and the self-reported Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ). We evaluated how these measures relate to auditory brainstem response, cortical electroencephalogram (EEG), behavioral (e.g., frequency modulation, FM detection), and self-reported factors. FM detection threshold emerged as a common factor across the predictive models for TIN, SRT, and SSQ, consistent with the possibility that temporal fine structure sensitivity is broadly related to different aspects of hearing in noise. In contrast, EEG P3 amplitude was only retained in the SSQ model and not in the TIN or SRT models, suggesting that cortical EEG measures may be more closely related to subjective than objective hearing in noise outcomes. Together, these findings suggest that different measures of hearing in noise capture partially distinct aspects of auditory function.
Related
- Aging and Hearing Loss in Emotional Prosody Processing: Divergent Neural Adaptation and Behavioral Performance
- Relationships between extended high frequency hearing, cognition, and speech-in-noise performance
- Audiometric, Perceptual and Subjective Cognitive Assessment of Hearing Loss in Adults with Hearing-Related Complaints.
- Persistent impairment of spatial hearing and neural binaural interaction after “temporary” noise-induced hearing loss
- Behavioral and Cortical Responses to Frequency Changes in Vowel-Like Stimuli in Listeners With Normal and Impaired Hearing
BibTeX
@article{liu2026reflects,
title = {{EEG reflects subjective but not behavioral hearing in noise performance}},
author = {Jiayue Liu and Joshua Stohl and Tobias Overath},
journal = {Cerebral Cortex (New York, NY)},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1093/cercor/bhag157},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhag157},
note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - EEG reflects subjective but not behavioral hearing in noise performance
AU - Jiayue Liu
AU - Joshua Stohl
AU - Tobias Overath
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/27
JO - Cerebral Cortex (New York, NY)
DO - 10.1093/cercor/bhag157
UR - https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhag157
AB - Ever since the first description of the “cocktail party problem” in 1953, much effort and progress have been devoted to understanding the factors that contribute to hearing difficulties in noise. Hearing difficulties in noise are multifold, and as such have been assessed using a range of objective and subjective measures. Here, we explored three distinct measures of hearing in noise: tone-in-noise (TIN) detection, speech reception threshold (SRT) in noise, and the self-reported Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ). We evaluated how these measures relate to auditory brainstem response, cortical electroencephalogram (EEG), behavioral (e.g., frequency modulation, FM detection), and self-reported factors. FM detection threshold emerged as a common factor across the predictive models for TIN, SRT, and SSQ, consistent with the possibility that temporal fine structure sensitivity is broadly related to different aspects of hearing in noise. In contrast, EEG P3 amplitude was only retained in the SSQ model and not in the TIN or SRT models, suggesting that cortical EEG measures may be more closely related to subjective than objective hearing in noise outcomes. Together, these findings suggest that different measures of hearing in noise capture partially distinct aspects of auditory function.
SN - 1047-3211
SN - 1460-2199
ER -