Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 10 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYGels (Basel, Switzerland)

Physical Aging, Composition, and Carbon-Additive Identity as Separable Rheological Controls in Colloidal-Cellulose Nanofibril-Natural-Rubber-Latex Hydrogels.

  1. 1Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Technology, University of Ljubljana, Večna pot 113, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Abstract

Hydrogels prepared from TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibrils (TCNFs), natural rubber latex (NRL), and carbon additives change their rheological properties during storage, so formulation comparisons made at uncontrolled aging states can be misleading. Here, TCNF-NRL hydrogels containing graphene conductive additive (GCA), graphene nanoplatelets (GNP), multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT), carboxylated multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT-COOH), or graphite were examined through four experimental sets that separate the effects of physical aging, total solids content, TCNF/carbon-additive ratio, carbon-additive loading, and additive identity. Oscillatory and steady-shear measurements were described with Cross and generalized Maxwell fits, and oscillatory-steady comparisons were quantified with a Cox-Merz deviation metric. Aging increased the storage modulus and the Cross low-shear viscosity by factors of 1.3 to 1.9 over about two weeks while the spectra remained elastic-dominated. At the late-storage comparison state, composition changed mainly the magnitude of the moduli and of the flow resistance: rankings by storage modulus and by low-shear viscosity agreed with Spearman rank coefficients of 0.89 to 1.00 across the four sets. At fixed base composition, the carbon additive changed the low-shear viscosity over a seven-fold range, from graphite and GCA at the low end to MWCNT at the high end, and the Cox-Merz deviation, expressed as the mean ratio of complex to steady-shear viscosity, ranged from 3.7 (GNP) to 7.3 (MWCNT). The late-storage states used for these comparisons are operational rather than equilibrated, and their ages differ between formulations, from 11 to 35 days, so the additive comparison was repeated at matched ages and the grouping was confirmed. No electrical or microstructural measurements were performed, so additive effects are reported as rheological observations, not as evidence of conductive-network formation.

Related

  1. Nanofibril Cellulose–Carrageenan Aerogel Production and the Effect of Crosslinker Addition on Aerogel Performance
    Esma Ege, Orçun Çağlar Kurtuluş
    PolymersPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMaterials & polymersCrossrefEurope PMC
  2. Natamycin-Loaded Soy Protein Isolate/Cellulose Nanofibril Edible Composite Film for Improving the Postharvest Quality of Blueberries.
    Haoru Qi, Xiaohui Pang, Sirui Wang +4
    Foods (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textMaterials & polymersEurope PMC
  3. Rheological and Morphological Characterization of Asphalt Cement Hybrid-Modified with Waste-Derived Cellulose Fibers and Crumb Rubber
    Hümeyra Bolakar Tosun, Fatma Pınar Göksal
    PolymersPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMaterials & polymersEurope PMC
  4. Bio-based cellulose-filled vitrimers for 3D printing via liquid deposition modeling: Rheological tuning and environmental assessment
    Edoardo Albertini, Mirko Busto, Sara Dalle Vacche +3
    Chemical Engineering JournalPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full text2 citedGeneral chemistryHAL
  5. Composition-Dependent Viscosity and Properties of MCC/CNC Regenerated Cellulose Hydrogels Prepared Using TBAF/DMSO.
    Na Hyeon Kim, Maria Jose Silva Pincay, Yeongjun Kim +8
    Gels (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textMaterials & polymersEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{alic2026physical,
  title = {{Physical Aging, Composition, and Carbon-Additive Identity as Separable Rheological Controls in Colloidal-Cellulose Nanofibril-Natural-Rubber-Latex Hydrogels.}},
  author = {Branko Alič and Urška Šebenik and Matjaž Krajnc},
  journal = {Gels (Basel, Switzerland)},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.3390/gels12100877},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42929912},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Physical Aging, Composition, and Carbon-Additive Identity as Separable Rheological Controls in Colloidal-Cellulose Nanofibril-Natural-Rubber-Latex Hydrogels.
AU  - Branko Alič
AU  - Urška Šebenik
AU  - Matjaž Krajnc
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/28
JO  - Gels (Basel, Switzerland)
DO  - 10.3390/gels12100877
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42929912
AB  - Hydrogels prepared from TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibrils (TCNFs), natural rubber latex (NRL), and carbon additives change their rheological properties during storage, so formulation comparisons made at uncontrolled aging states can be misleading. Here, TCNF-NRL hydrogels containing graphene conductive additive (GCA), graphene nanoplatelets (GNP), multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT), carboxylated multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT-COOH), or graphite were examined through four experimental sets that separate the effects of physical aging, total solids content, TCNF/carbon-additive ratio, carbon-additive loading, and additive identity. Oscillatory and steady-shear measurements were described with Cross and generalized Maxwell fits, and oscillatory-steady comparisons were quantified with a Cox-Merz deviation metric. Aging increased the storage modulus and the Cross low-shear viscosity by factors of 1.3 to 1.9 over about two weeks while the spectra remained elastic-dominated. At the late-storage comparison state, composition changed mainly the magnitude of the moduli and of the flow resistance: rankings by storage modulus and by low-shear viscosity agreed with Spearman rank coefficients of 0.89 to 1.00 across the four sets. At fixed base composition, the carbon additive changed the low-shear viscosity over a seven-fold range, from graphite and GCA at the low end to MWCNT at the high end, and the Cox-Merz deviation, expressed as the mean ratio of complex to steady-shear viscosity, ranged from 3.7 (GNP) to 7.3 (MWCNT). The late-storage states used for these comparisons are operational rather than equilibrated, and their ages differ between formulations, from 11 to 35 days, so the additive comparison was repeated at matched ages and the grouping was confirmed. No electrical or microstructural measurements were performed, so additive effects are reported as rheological observations, not as evidence of conductive-network formation.
SN  - 2310-2861
ER  -