Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 44 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Journal of Clinical Medicine

Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae Detected on Routine Sacroiliac Joint Radiographs in a Rheumatology Cohort: Comparison of Castellvi and Jenkins Systems

  • Jakub Jankowski1
  • Natalia Maślanek1
  • Marcin Glin1
  • Marcin Jasiewicz2
  • Agnieszka Pawełczyk1
  • Michał Polguj3
  • Maciej Radek1
  1. 1Department of Neurosurgery, Spine and Peripheral Nerve Surgery, Medical University of Lodz, Żeromskiego 113, 90-549 Lodz, Poland
  2. 2Department of Medical Imaging Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Narutowicza 60, 90-136 Lodz, Poland
  3. 3Department of Normal and Clinical Anatomy, Chair of Anatomy and Histology, Medical University of Lodz, 90-752 Lodz, Poland
Open at sourceDOICite

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (LSTV) are an under-recognized anatomical variant potentially associated with low back pain (LBP). Comparative data on the established Castellvi classification and the more recently proposed Jenkins system are also limited. This study compared LSTV detection by the two systems on routine sacroiliac joint radiographs and evaluated associations with age, LBP, and rheumatologic diagnoses. Methods: This retrospective study included 817 patients who underwent sacroiliac joint radiography at a rheumatology outpatient clinic between 2022 and 2024. Radiographs were reassessed using a standardized protocol. Age-related patterns and alternative transverse process–sacral ala distance thresholds were evaluated. Associations between LSTV and documented LBP were adjusted for age, sex, radiographic sacroiliitis grade, and the presence of a recorded rheumatologic diagnosis. Results: LSTV was identified in 248/817 patients (30.4%) by Castellvi and in 735/817 (90.0%) by Jenkins. The discrepancy was driven predominantly by Type I variants (20.9% vs. 80.5%); after their exclusion, both systems identified the same 77/817 patients (9.4%) as having Types II–IV. Jenkins-positive prevalence rose from 68.4% in patients younger than 20 years to 100% in those aged ≥70 years (Cochran–Armitage Z = 6.80, p < 0.001), whereas no corresponding trend was observed for Castellvi. An exploratory TP–sacral ala threshold of <5 mm reduced Jenkins-positive prevalence to 61.7%. Neither classification was associated with documented LBP after multivariable adjustment. LSTV was not mentioned in any original sacroiliac joint radiology reports. Conclusions: The Castellvi and Jenkins systems yielded markedly different LSTV prevalence estimates, primarily because of their differing Type I criteria. The high prevalence and strong age dependence of Jenkins Type I findings suggest that the 10-mm distance criterion may capture age-dependent anatomical configurations in addition to transitional morphology and highlight the need for independent validation before its broader clinical use.

Related

  1. Prevalence and Clinical Impact of Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae in Chronic Low Back Pain: A Cross-Sectional Study from Central India.
    Vipin Kumar Mishra, Jeetesh Gawande, Saumya Mishra
    Journal of orthopaedic case reportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae: a review of prevalence, classification, morphology, imaging and clinical implications.
    John Marchesi, Charles Hancock, Kari Odland +2
    Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  3. OA21 The Rising Ferritin – Recognising HLH Secondary to Still’s Disease in Transitional Rheumatology Care
    Hugh Larkin, Eleana Ntatsaki, Suzanne Lane +1
    Rheumatology advances in practicePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCPMC
  4. Comparison of CT-Guided Platelet-Rich Plasma vs Steroid/Anesthetic Injection for Treatment of Sacroiliac Joint Pain: A Randomized, Single-Blinded, Controlled Trial
    Miriam E. Peckham, Zachary L. McCormick, Ghazaleh Safazadeh +3
    AJNR: American Journal of NeuroradiologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaPMC
  5. Comparison of intraoperative robot-assisted 3D and 2D fluoroscopy guided sacroiliac screw placement
    YU Jinlong, SONG Xuhua, GUO Zhitao +3
    Zhongguo linchuang yanjiuPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaDOAJ

Cite

BibTeXRIS
BibTeX
@article{jankowski2026lumbosacral,
  title = {{Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae Detected on Routine Sacroiliac Joint Radiographs in a Rheumatology Cohort: Comparison of Castellvi and Jenkins Systems}},
  author = {Jakub Jankowski and Natalia Maślanek and Marcin Glin and Marcin Jasiewicz and Agnieszka Pawełczyk and Michał Polguj and Maciej Radek},
  journal = {Journal of Clinical Medicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/jcm15218436},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/21/8436},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae Detected on Routine Sacroiliac Joint Radiographs in a Rheumatology Cohort: Comparison of Castellvi and Jenkins Systems
AU  - Jakub Jankowski
AU  - Natalia Maślanek
AU  - Marcin Glin
AU  - Marcin Jasiewicz
AU  - Agnieszka Pawełczyk
AU  - Michał Polguj
AU  - Maciej Radek
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/29
JO  - Journal of Clinical Medicine
DO  - 10.3390/jcm15218436
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/21/8436
AB  - Background/Objectives: Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (LSTV) are an under-recognized anatomical variant potentially associated with low back pain (LBP). Comparative data on the established Castellvi classification and the more recently proposed Jenkins system are also limited. This study compared LSTV detection by the two systems on routine sacroiliac joint radiographs and evaluated associations with age, LBP, and rheumatologic diagnoses. Methods: This retrospective study included 817 patients who underwent sacroiliac joint radiography at a rheumatology outpatient clinic between 2022 and 2024. Radiographs were reassessed using a standardized protocol. Age-related patterns and alternative transverse process–sacral ala distance thresholds were evaluated. Associations between LSTV and documented LBP were adjusted for age, sex, radiographic sacroiliitis grade, and the presence of a recorded rheumatologic diagnosis. Results: LSTV was identified in 248/817 patients (30.4%) by Castellvi and in 735/817 (90.0%) by Jenkins. The discrepancy was driven predominantly by Type I variants (20.9% vs. 80.5%); after their exclusion, both systems identified the same 77/817 patients (9.4%) as having Types II–IV. Jenkins-positive prevalence rose from 68.4% in patients younger than 20 years to 100% in those aged ≥70 years (Cochran–Armitage Z = 6.80, p < 0.001), whereas no corresponding trend was observed for Castellvi. An exploratory TP–sacral ala threshold of <5 mm reduced Jenkins-positive prevalence to 61.7%. Neither classification was associated with documented LBP after multivariable adjustment. LSTV was not mentioned in any original sacroiliac joint radiology reports. Conclusions: The Castellvi and Jenkins systems yielded markedly different LSTV prevalence estimates, primarily because of their differing Type I criteria. The high prevalence and strong age dependence of Jenkins Type I findings suggest that the 10-mm distance criterion may capture age-dependent anatomical configurations in addition to transitional morphology and highlight the need for independent validation before its broader clinical use.
SN  - 2077-0383
ER  -