Prevalence and Clinical Impact of Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae in Chronic Low Back Pain: A Cross-Sectional Study from Central India.
- 1Department of Orthopaedics, Government Medical College, Satna, Madhya Pradesh, India.
- 2Department of Orthopaedics, Shyam Shah Medical College, Rewa, Madhya Pradesh, India.
- 3Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Government Medical College, Satna, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Abstract
Introduction
Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (LSTV) are common anatomical variants implicated in chronic low back pain (LBP). Their prevalence and clinical significance remain debated.Materials and methods
A hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 350 consecutive adult patients (18-70 years) with chronic non-specific LBP at a tertiary care center in Central India. Demographic and clinical data were recorded, pain intensity assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and disability quantified with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Standardized lumbosacral radiographs were obtained and independently reviewed by experienced specialists. LSTV were classified according to Castellvi types. Statistical comparisons were performed between patients with and without LSTV, and across LSTV subtypes.Results
Of 350 patients, 198 (56.6%) were male; mean age was 42.8 ± 11.6 years. Radiographic LSTVs were identified in 78 patients, yielding a prevalence of 22.3%. Distribution by Castellvi type was: Type I (30.8%), Type II (25.6%), Type III (23.1%), and Type IV (20.5%). Patients with LSTV had significantly higher mean VAS (6.2 ± 1.4 vs. 5.4 ± 1.6; P = 0.002) and ODI scores (34.8 ± 9.7 vs. 29.1 ± 10.2; P = 0.001) compared to those without. High-grade LSTV (Types II-IV) were associated with greater pain and disability than low-grade variants (P < 0.05). ANOVA confirmed significant differences in ODI across Castellvi types, with Type III and IV showing the highest disability.Conclusion
LSTV were present in nearly one-fourth of patients with chronic LBP and were associated with significantly greater pain and disability, particularly in high-grade variants. Recognition of LSTV may aid in clinical evaluation and management of chronic LBP.
Related
- Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae Detected on Routine Sacroiliac Joint Radiographs in a Rheumatology Cohort: Comparison of Castellvi and Jenkins Systems
- Executive dysfunction in COPD: prevalence and clinical correlates of cognitive impairment : A cross-sectional case–control study
- Prevalence of motor neuron disease and its clinical subtypes in the Valencian Community, Spain: a population-based cross-sectional study using linked electronic health records
- Prevalence and clinical characterization of malnutrition, sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity in older adults with cardiometabolic diseases: SENIOR cross-sectional study
- The utility of patient symptom questionnaires in CT of the lumbosacral spine
BibTeX
@article{mishra2026prevalence,
title = {{Prevalence and Clinical Impact of Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae in Chronic Low Back Pain: A Cross-Sectional Study from Central India.}},
author = {Vipin Kumar Mishra and Jeetesh Gawande and Saumya Mishra},
journal = {Journal of orthopaedic case reports},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.13107/jocr.2026.v16.i10.8338},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42851896},
note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Prevalence and Clinical Impact of Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae in Chronic Low Back Pain: A Cross-Sectional Study from Central India.
AU - Vipin Kumar Mishra
AU - Jeetesh Gawande
AU - Saumya Mishra
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/01
JO - Journal of orthopaedic case reports
DO - 10.13107/jocr.2026.v16.i10.8338
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42851896
AB - Introduction Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (LSTV) are common anatomical variants implicated in chronic low back pain (LBP). Their prevalence and clinical significance remain debated.Materials and methods A hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 350 consecutive adult patients (18-70 years) with chronic non-specific LBP at a tertiary care center in Central India. Demographic and clinical data were recorded, pain intensity assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and disability quantified with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Standardized lumbosacral radiographs were obtained and independently reviewed by experienced specialists. LSTV were classified according to Castellvi types. Statistical comparisons were performed between patients with and without LSTV, and across LSTV subtypes.Results Of 350 patients, 198 (56.6%) were male; mean age was 42.8 ± 11.6 years. Radiographic LSTVs were identified in 78 patients, yielding a prevalence of 22.3%. Distribution by Castellvi type was: Type I (30.8%), Type II (25.6%), Type III (23.1%), and Type IV (20.5%). Patients with LSTV had significantly higher mean VAS (6.2 ± 1.4 vs. 5.4 ± 1.6; P = 0.002) and ODI scores (34.8 ± 9.7 vs. 29.1 ± 10.2; P = 0.001) compared to those without. High-grade LSTV (Types II-IV) were associated with greater pain and disability than low-grade variants (P < 0.05). ANOVA confirmed significant differences in ODI across Castellvi types, with Type III and IV showing the highest disability.Conclusion LSTV were present in nearly one-fourth of patients with chronic LBP and were associated with significantly greater pain and disability, particularly in high-grade variants. Recognition of LSTV may aid in clinical evaluation and management of chronic LBP.
SN - 2250-0685
SN - 2321-3817
ER -