Understanding Medical Invalidation from the Patient Perspective: A Qualitative Interview Study Across Diseases and Healthcare Settings
Abstract
Objective Research on patients feeling that their symptoms are not taken seriously (medical invalidation) has predominantly focused on individual diseases. This study explored patients' experiences across different medical conditions and healthcare contexts to identify common characteristics, contributing factors, consequences, and opportunities for prevention. Methods The study was conducted in Germany between January and March 2025 using interviews undertaken remotely or in person. Data were analysed using qualitative content analysis following Kuckartz and Rädiker. Thirty-one adults (≥18 years) with self-reported experiences of not being taken seriously in healthcare were purposively recruited through patient organisations and social media to achieve maximum variation regarding symptoms and diagnoses. Results Participants described not being taken seriously as a cross-cutting healthcare phenomenon occurring across diverse symptoms, diagnoses, medical specialties, and healthcare settings. Experiences ranged from isolated encounters to cumulative processes that developed over repeated interactions with healthcare professionals (HCPs). Contributing factors were perceived at multiple levels, including healthcare system, HCPs, patient, disease, and interactional factors, which frequently interacted. Consequences extended beyond the initial consultation and included psychological distress, loss of trust, delayed or inappropriate diagnosis and treatment, reduced healthcare utilisation, occupational consequences, and impaired social well-being. Participants identified opportunities for prevention at different levels, highlighting structured feedback mechanisms. Conclusions Medical invalidation is a multifactorial phenomenon that extends across diseases and healthcare settings. Patients emphasized that medical invalidation depends not only on clinical decision-making but on being heard, having their illness perceptions acknowledged, and receiving transparent communication. Strengthening these elements of patient-centred care may improve healthcare experiences.
Related
- Towards a Transactional Understanding of Stress and Coping Among Nursing Students: A qualitative interview study
- Understanding research practices and methodological choices when applying the Person-Based Approach to health intervention development: A qualitative interview study
- Understanding the needs and frustrations in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a qualitative interview study.
- Healthcare professionals’ perspectives on implementing opt-out smoking cessation in perioperative and cancer care in the Netherlands: A qualitative interview study
- Language, perceived discrimination and barriers to complaint use: sub-Saharan African immigrants' healthcare experiences in Oslo, a qualitative interview study
BibTeX
@misc{lerch2026understanding,
title = {{Understanding Medical Invalidation from the Patient Perspective: A Qualitative Interview Study Across Diseases and Healthcare Settings}},
author = {Seraina Petra Lerch},
howpublished = {PsyArXiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.31234/osf.io/87ptd_v1},
url = {https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/87ptd_v1/},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Understanding Medical Invalidation from the Patient Perspective: A Qualitative Interview Study Across Diseases and Healthcare Settings
AU - Seraina Petra Lerch
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/07
PB - PsyArXiv
DO - 10.31234/osf.io/87ptd_v1
UR - https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/87ptd_v1/
AB - Objective Research on patients feeling that their symptoms are not taken seriously (medical invalidation) has predominantly focused on individual diseases. This study explored patients' experiences across different medical conditions and healthcare contexts to identify common characteristics, contributing factors, consequences, and opportunities for prevention. Methods The study was conducted in Germany between January and March 2025 using interviews undertaken remotely or in person. Data were analysed using qualitative content analysis following Kuckartz and Rädiker. Thirty-one adults (≥18 years) with self-reported experiences of not being taken seriously in healthcare were purposively recruited through patient organisations and social media to achieve maximum variation regarding symptoms and diagnoses. Results Participants described not being taken seriously as a cross-cutting healthcare phenomenon occurring across diverse symptoms, diagnoses, medical specialties, and healthcare settings. Experiences ranged from isolated encounters to cumulative processes that developed over repeated interactions with healthcare professionals (HCPs). Contributing factors were perceived at multiple levels, including healthcare system, HCPs, patient, disease, and interactional factors, which frequently interacted. Consequences extended beyond the initial consultation and included psychological distress, loss of trust, delayed or inappropriate diagnosis and treatment, reduced healthcare utilisation, occupational consequences, and impaired social well-being. Participants identified opportunities for prevention at different levels, highlighting structured feedback mechanisms. Conclusions Medical invalidation is a multifactorial phenomenon that extends across diseases and healthcare settings. Patients emphasized that medical invalidation depends not only on clinical decision-making but on being heard, having their illness perceptions acknowledged, and receiving transparent communication. Strengthening these elements of patient-centred care may improve healthcare experiences.
ER -