Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 37 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-NDbioRxiv

Demographic stochasticity can drive population variability even in large populations

  1. 1Japan Fisheries Research and Education Agency

Abstract

Demographic stochasticity is generally expected to contribute little to population variability when census abundance is large, because random demographic events are increasingly averaged across many individuals. This expectation, however, depends on how evenly individuals contribute to reproduction. In many natural populations, reproductive success is highly skewed, so that a large census population can coexist with a much smaller effective number of breeders (Nb). Although Nb is commonly used as a genetic measure of contemporary effective size, it also summarizes variation in reproductive contribution and may therefore contain information about demographic variability. Here, we develop a female-based age-structured theoretical framework linking Nb to temporal variability in mature population abundance, with N denoting the census number of mature females and Nb the effective number of female breeders. Recruitment variability arises from non-Poisson reproductive variation and environmental stochasticity, and its transmission to mature abundance is described by a life-history coefficient, {gamma}, determined by survival, maturation, and the contribution of overlapping cohorts. When the Poisson component of recruitment variance is negligible and Nb/N is sufficiently small, the coefficient of variation in mature abundance, CV[N], can be approximated from Nb, environmental variability, and {gamma}, with little additional information from census abundance. This approximation does not require specification of the functional form of the relationship between adult abundance and recruitment. Stochastic age-structured simulations closely reproduced the analytical prediction, even when additional demographic stochasticity in survival was included. Substantial fluctuations in mature abundance occurred at census sizes on the order of 105 when Nb was small, whereas overlapping cohorts buffered recruitment fluctuations. Because Nb can be estimated genetically from samples of a single cohort, the framework provides a direct link between genetic monitoring and population dynamics. More broadly, these results show that large census abundance alone does not guarantee weak demographic variability and highlight the potential of genetic data to inform expected population fluctuations when detailed demographic information is limited.

Related

  1. Stochasticity and Environmental Switching Shape Quorum Sensing Evolution in Bacterial Populations
    Uttam Kumar, Hong-Yan Shih
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textEvolutionary biologyarXiv
  2. Exploring density‐dependent relationships in demographic parameters in populations of birds at a large spatial scale
    Emmanuel Paradis, Stephen Baillie, William Sutherland +1
    OikosPeer-reviewedPublisher termsFull text58 citedEcologyEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
  3. Polygenic polymorphisms cooperate to drive expansion of HCMV adaptive NK cell and NK-like T cell populations
    J.-B. Le Luduec, T. Kontopoulos, M. K. Panjwani +4
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textImmunologybioRxiv
  4. Glaciers retreat, stickleback advance: variation in demographic histories of freshwater stickleback populations
    H. Rosinger, R. Greenway, C. Hudson +4
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textEvolutionary biologybioRxiv
  5. Multiple introductions shaped genomic diversity and demographic history of invasive box tree moth (Cydalima perspectalis) populations in North America
    A. Basnet, T. Choudhary, J. Antonides +6
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NCFull textGenetics & genomicsbioRxiv
BibTeX
@misc{akita2026demographic,
  title = {{Demographic stochasticity can drive population variability even in large populations}},
  author = {T. Akita},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.10.07.757207},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.07.757207v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Demographic stochasticity can drive population variability even in large populations
AU  - T. Akita
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/07
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.10.07.757207
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.07.757207v1
AB  - Demographic stochasticity is generally expected to contribute little to population variability when census abundance is large, because random demographic events are increasingly averaged across many individuals. This expectation, however, depends on how evenly individuals contribute to reproduction. In many natural populations, reproductive success is highly skewed, so that a large census population can coexist with a much smaller effective number of breeders (Nb). Although Nb is commonly used as a genetic measure of contemporary effective size, it also summarizes variation in reproductive contribution and may therefore contain information about demographic variability. Here, we develop a female-based age-structured theoretical framework linking Nb to temporal variability in mature population abundance, with N denoting the census number of mature females and Nb the effective number of female breeders. Recruitment variability arises from non-Poisson reproductive variation and environmental stochasticity, and its transmission to mature abundance is described by a life-history coefficient, {gamma}, determined by survival, maturation, and the contribution of overlapping cohorts. When the Poisson component of recruitment variance is negligible and Nb/N is sufficiently small, the coefficient of variation in mature abundance, CV[N], can be approximated from Nb, environmental variability, and {gamma}, with little additional information from census abundance. This approximation does not require specification of the functional form of the relationship between adult abundance and recruitment. Stochastic age-structured simulations closely reproduced the analytical prediction, even when additional demographic stochasticity in survival was included. Substantial fluctuations in mature abundance occurred at census sizes on the order of 105 when Nb was small, whereas overlapping cohorts buffered recruitment fluctuations. Because Nb can be estimated genetically from samples of a single cohort, the framework provides a direct link between genetic monitoring and population dynamics. More broadly, these results show that large census abundance alone does not guarantee weak demographic variability and highlight the potential of genetic data to inform expected population fluctuations when detailed demographic information is limited.
ER  -