Making Teledermatology Services Work: A Realist Review of Success Factors
4 affiliations
- 1Centre for Online Health The University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia
- 2Dermatology Research Centre, Frazer Institute, The University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia
- 3The Australasian College of Dermatologists Sydney New South Wales Australia
- 4Department of Dermatology Princess Alexandra Hospital Brisbane Queensland Australia
Abstract
The implementation of teledermatology, as with other telehealth services, varies across settings. The aim of this study was to use a modified realist review methodology to synthesise factors that lead to successfully implementing and running teledermatology services. PubMed was searched in July 2025 to identify articles published internationally from 2020 to 2025 that provided a description of a teledermatology service and contained the authors' interpretation as to what contributed to the success of the service. The search returned 992 articles and 100 were included in the review after screening. Data was extracted independently by two authors who discussed terminology and interpretation of the independent data extracts. The authors modified the extracted data to ensure consistency in concepts and wording. From the included articles, 45 success factors were identified and coded using qualitative methods into eight themes: (1) Technology and imaging; (2) Hybrid model‐of‐care; (3) Communication; (4) People and staffing; (5) Quality of information; (6) Education and training; (7) Optimisation; and (8) Funding. The top three factors from each theme are explained in detail in this paper, and a full list of all items attributed to successful services is included in Supporting Information. The most common factors mentioned were having high quality images and using a comprehensive referral template. Some factors, such as the broader funding landscape, were acknowledged as contributing to success and represent opportunities for further advocacy. Our findings can be used to develop guidance on future teledermatology service implementation and optimisation.
Related
- Identifying and prioritizing key risk factors in internet-based shared nursing services from the nurses’ perspective: a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach
- Understanding decision making factors influencing referrals to vision rehabilitation services at a tertiary medical center
- How and why women’s life histories and homelessness services generate heterogeneous recovery outcomes in Barcelona: a co-created realist evaluation protocol
- Contextual Factors and Intentional Rounding in Acute Hospitals: Understanding What Works, for Whom, in What Settings: A Realist Synthesis
- Factors affecting adolescent participation in HIV/AIDS prevention services provided by Non-Governmental Organizations in Iran
BibTeX
@article{taylor2026making,
title = {{Making Teledermatology Services Work: A Realist Review of Success Factors}},
author = {Monica L. Taylor and Preksha Machaiya Kuppanda and Annie Bygraves and Cathy Baynie and Haley Bennett and H. Peter Soyer and Liam J. Caffery},
journal = {The Australasian Journal of Dermatology},
year = {2026},
month = jul,
doi = {10.1111/ajd.70183},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/ajd.70183},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Making Teledermatology Services Work: A Realist Review of Success Factors
AU - Monica L. Taylor
AU - Preksha Machaiya Kuppanda
AU - Annie Bygraves
AU - Cathy Baynie
AU - Haley Bennett
AU - H. Peter Soyer
AU - Liam J. Caffery
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/07/14
JO - The Australasian Journal of Dermatology
DO - 10.1111/ajd.70183
UR - https://doi.org/10.1111/ajd.70183
AB - The implementation of teledermatology, as with other telehealth services, varies across settings. The aim of this study was to use a modified realist review methodology to synthesise factors that lead to successfully implementing and running teledermatology services. PubMed was searched in July 2025 to identify articles published internationally from 2020 to 2025 that provided a description of a teledermatology service and contained the authors' interpretation as to what contributed to the success of the service. The search returned 992 articles and 100 were included in the review after screening. Data was extracted independently by two authors who discussed terminology and interpretation of the independent data extracts. The authors modified the extracted data to ensure consistency in concepts and wording. From the included articles, 45 success factors were identified and coded using qualitative methods into eight themes: (1) Technology and imaging; (2) Hybrid model‐of‐care; (3) Communication; (4) People and staffing; (5) Quality of information; (6) Education and training; (7) Optimisation; and (8) Funding. The top three factors from each theme are explained in detail in this paper, and a full list of all items attributed to successful services is included in Supporting Information. The most common factors mentioned were having high quality images and using a comprehensive referral template. Some factors, such as the broader funding landscape, were acknowledged as contributing to success and represent opportunities for further advocacy. Our findings can be used to develop guidance on future teledermatology service implementation and optimisation.
SN - 0004-8380
SN - 1440-0960
ER -