Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,161 studies31 sourcesUpdated 39 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Earth and Space Science

A New Amphibious Earthquake Catalog for the Alaska Peninsula: Training, Testing, and Applying Machine Learning Earthquake Picking in Offshore and Amphibious Environments

  1. 1Earth and Atmospheric Sciences Department Cornell University Ithaca NY USA
  2. 2USGS Earthquake Science Center Seattle WA USA

Abstract

The dual seismological developments of large‐scale offshore observational networks and high‐quality machine‐learning earthquake detection and picking allow unprecedented seismicity detection in high hazard subduction zones. We develop a high resolution machine learning enhanced seismicity catalog for the Alaska Peninsula stretch of the Alaska‐Aleutian Subduction Zone, which was instrumented with both land and ocean bottom seismometers during the Alaska Amphibious Community Seismic Experiment (AACSE) in 2018–2019. We first use an analyst‐checked AACSE catalog to develop new local land and ocean‐bottom earthquake waveform training data sets, which we then use to fine‐tune the EQTransformer machine learning picking model. In the process, we test multiple training strategies for best picking performance on ocean‐bottom waveform data. We evaluate the effect of choice of pre‐trained starting model, addition of waveform bandpass filtering, and choice of random metadata split. We find no training strategy to be substantially better than the others. Instead, simply having a local waveform data set to fine‐tune the picking model substantially improves performance on both the ocean‐bottom and land seismic data from AACSE. We finally apply the separately trained land and ocean‐bottom models to continuous seismic data for AACSE and use an iterative catalog refinement method to detect new small‐magnitude seismicity. The machine learning enhanced catalog has roughly 3x more earthquakes than the analyst‐checked catalog, and the magnitude of completeness is regionally variable but decreases 0.1–0.4 magnitude units. With more small seismicity detected, seismicity patterns mirror prior observations in the region. Detection is especially improved far offshore and in the outer rise.

Related

  1. Lithium and strontium isotope systematics of hot spring waters from the Noto Peninsula: Constraints on the origin of geofluids associated with the 2024 M7.6 earthquake
    Zahra Zandvakili, Takanori Kagoshima, Tomoaki Morishita +4
    GEOCHEMICAL JOURNALPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textGeology & geochemistryJ-STAGE
  2. First dinosaur and turtle remains from the latest Cretaceous shallow marine deposits of Albaina (Laño quarry, Iberian Peninsula)
    Xabier Pereda-Suberbiola, Adán Pérez-García, José Carmelo Corral +6
    Comptes Rendus. PalevolPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text9 citedEvolutionary biologyGeneral earth scienceHAL
  3. Profiles of environmental contaminants in hawksbill turtle egg yolks reflect local to distant pollution sources among nesting beaches in the Yucatán Peninsula, Mexico
    Cynthia Muñoz, Peter Vermeiren
    Marine Environmental ResearchPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full text24 citedEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
  4. Cave development in the Qatar peninsula: insights on their origin and associated geohazards
    Jerome Perrin, Gildas Noury, Silvain Yart +15
    Acta CarsologicaPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeology & geochemistryHAL
  5. The Decline of Seasonal Snowpack by Mid‐Century in Mountainous National Parks of the Iberian Peninsula
    César Deschamps‐berger, Juan‐ignacio López‐moreno, Jesus Revuelto +6
    Hydrological ProcessesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textHydrology & soilsHAL
BibTeX
@article{barcheck2026amphibious,
  title = {{A New Amphibious Earthquake Catalog for the Alaska Peninsula: Training, Testing, and Applying Machine Learning Earthquake Picking in Offshore and Amphibious Environments}},
  author = {G. Barcheck and N. A. Ruppert},
  journal = {Earth and Space Science},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1029/2026ea005230},
  url = {https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2026EA005230},
  note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - A New Amphibious Earthquake Catalog for the Alaska Peninsula: Training, Testing, and Applying Machine Learning Earthquake Picking in Offshore and Amphibious Environments
AU  - G. Barcheck
AU  - N. A. Ruppert
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/28
JO  - Earth and Space Science
DO  - 10.1029/2026ea005230
UR  - https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2026EA005230
AB  - The dual seismological developments of large‐scale offshore observational networks and high‐quality machine‐learning earthquake detection and picking allow unprecedented seismicity detection in high hazard subduction zones. We develop a high resolution machine learning enhanced seismicity catalog for the Alaska Peninsula stretch of the Alaska‐Aleutian Subduction Zone, which was instrumented with both land and ocean bottom seismometers during the Alaska Amphibious Community Seismic Experiment (AACSE) in 2018–2019. We first use an analyst‐checked AACSE catalog to develop new local land and ocean‐bottom earthquake waveform training data sets, which we then use to fine‐tune the EQTransformer machine learning picking model. In the process, we test multiple training strategies for best picking performance on ocean‐bottom waveform data. We evaluate the effect of choice of pre‐trained starting model, addition of waveform bandpass filtering, and choice of random metadata split. We find no training strategy to be substantially better than the others. Instead, simply having a local waveform data set to fine‐tune the picking model substantially improves performance on both the ocean‐bottom and land seismic data from AACSE. We finally apply the separately trained land and ocean‐bottom models to continuous seismic data for AACSE and use an iterative catalog refinement method to detect new small‐magnitude seismicity. The machine learning enhanced catalog has roughly 3x more earthquakes than the analyst‐checked catalog, and the magnitude of completeness is regionally variable but decreases 0.1–0.4 magnitude units. With more small seismicity detected, seismicity patterns mirror prior observations in the region. Detection is especially improved far offshore and in the outer rise.
SN  - 2333-5084
SN  - 2333-5084
ER  -