Screening-based low energy availability risk, disordered eating risk, and their co-occurrence among female volleyball players: a cross-sectional study
- 1Department of Physical Education and Sports Education, Yozgat Bozok University, Yozgat, Türkiye
- 2Department of Physical Education and Sports, Bayburt University, Bayburt, Türkiye
- 3Department of Coaching Education, Yozgat Bozok University, Yozgat, Türkiye
Abstract
Low energy availability (LEA) and disordered eating (DE) are important health concerns in female athletes, yet their occurrence and co-occurrence in team-sport contexts, particularly volleyball, remain underexplored. This cross-sectional online survey study examined the proportions of athletes classified as being at risk of LEA and DE overall and across competition levels, and assessed the co-occurrence between the two risk classifications in female volleyball players in Türkiye, using the Low Energy Availability in Females Questionnaire (LEAF-Q) and Eating Attitudes Test-26 (EAT-26). It also examined correlations between EAT-26 total score and LEAF-Q total and domain scores. A total of 213 athletes, recruited via non-probability convenience sampling, completed the LEAF-Q and EAT-26 to assess LEA risk and DE risk, respectively. In this sample, 33.3% of athletes were classified as being at risk of LEA, with no difference across competition levels (p = 0.825). A total of 17.4% were classified as being at risk of DE, with variation across competition levels and the highest proportion among Turkish Women’s Volleyball Second League athletes (p = 0.034). LEA risk and DE risk co-occurred in 10.3% of the sample, and DE risk was associated with higher odds of LEA risk (unadjusted OR = 3.80, 95% CI: 1.82–7.92). EAT-26 total score was positively correlated with LEAF-Q total and gastrointestinal function scores (p < 0.001) and injury history score (p = 0.004), but not menstrual function score (p = 0.133). These results suggest that LEA risk was commonly identified in this sample, DE risk was comparatively less common, and their co-occurrence was only partial, highlighting the value of screening for both risks rather than assuming one from the other.
Related
- State Disparities in Lung Cancer Screening Uptake Despite Facility Availability in the United States, 2024-2025: A Cross-Sectional Ecological Study
- Wearable inertial sensor assessment of kinematic characteristics during unilateral jump landings in elite volleyball players with patellar tendinopathy: a cross-sectional study
- Service Provider Competence, Motivation, and Resource Availability as Determinants of Quality Healthcare Delivery: A Cross-Sectional Study at Makeni Regional Hospital, Sierra Leone
- ECG Holter-based screening for sleep-disordered breathing in post-stroke patients: a large monocentric cohort study
- Associations between natural area availability and morbidity: a cross-sectional study using health insurance billing data from Germany
BibTeX
@article{andre2026screeningbased,
title = {{Screening-based low energy availability risk, disordered eating risk, and their co-occurrence among female volleyball players: a cross-sectional study}},
author = {Hülya André and Derya Çetin Sarışık and Arda Özçelik},
journal = {PLOS One},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0360395},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0360395},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Screening-based low energy availability risk, disordered eating risk, and their co-occurrence among female volleyball players: a cross-sectional study
AU - Hülya André
AU - Derya Çetin Sarışık
AU - Arda Özçelik
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/08
JO - PLOS One
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0360395
UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0360395
AB - Low energy availability (LEA) and disordered eating (DE) are important health concerns in female athletes, yet their occurrence and co-occurrence in team-sport contexts, particularly volleyball, remain underexplored. This cross-sectional online survey study examined the proportions of athletes classified as being at risk of LEA and DE overall and across competition levels, and assessed the co-occurrence between the two risk classifications in female volleyball players in Türkiye, using the Low Energy Availability in Females Questionnaire (LEAF-Q) and Eating Attitudes Test-26 (EAT-26). It also examined correlations between EAT-26 total score and LEAF-Q total and domain scores. A total of 213 athletes, recruited via non-probability convenience sampling, completed the LEAF-Q and EAT-26 to assess LEA risk and DE risk, respectively. In this sample, 33.3% of athletes were classified as being at risk of LEA, with no difference across competition levels (p = 0.825). A total of 17.4% were classified as being at risk of DE, with variation across competition levels and the highest proportion among Turkish Women’s Volleyball Second League athletes (p = 0.034). LEA risk and DE risk co-occurred in 10.3% of the sample, and DE risk was associated with higher odds of LEA risk (unadjusted OR = 3.80, 95% CI: 1.82–7.92). EAT-26 total score was positively correlated with LEAF-Q total and gastrointestinal function scores (p < 0.001) and injury history score (p = 0.004), but not menstrual function score (p = 0.133). These results suggest that LEA risk was commonly identified in this sample, DE risk was comparatively less common, and their co-occurrence was only partial, highlighting the value of screening for both risks rather than assuming one from the other.
SN - 1932-6203
ER -