The Climate Stance Inventory: Development and validation in a large longitudinal sample of UK adults
Abstract
The climate attitude–behaviour gap persists, with individual variables explaining limited behavioural variance. To address this problem, we develop and validate the Climate Stance Inventory (CSI), a continuous measure of 15 recurring orientations towards climate change and climate action derived from the Norm Activation Model. In a three-wave longitudinal study, 1,503 adults from the United Kingdom completed the CSI and measures of climate appraisals and environmental behaviour over approximately 10 weeks. Across waves, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses identified a 15-factor solution that exhibited good fit (CFI = .979, RMSEA = .034), high internal consistency (α/ω = .69–.88) and test-retest correlations (r = .58–.89) and full longitudinal measurement invariance. Climate stances showed theoretically coherent associations with threat certainty, responsibility-related appraisals, efficacy, institutional trust and pro-environmental behaviour. In hierarchical regressions, they explained substantial additional variance beyond demographic characteristics and climate change anxiety in pro-environmental voting (14.2%), workplace behaviour (19.5%) and behaviour outside work (22.4%). The Bystander stance also explained unique variance beyond a conceptually adjacent established barrier measure. These findings support the CSI as a reliable, temporally stable and substantively valid measure that can distinguish different psychological routes to climate (in)action and support the development and evaluation of more targeted climate-belief interventions.
Related
- Temperature-Dependent Development, Survival, and Population Growth of Novius penicillioides: Implications for Biological Control of Icerya jacobsoni Under Climate Warming
- Milk Production and Climate Variability in a High-Andean Dairy System: A Longitudinal Case Study.
- Inertial coupling between swing and stance legs shapes ankle torque profile during running
- Gait speed and multi-segment foot joint kinematics throughout the entire stance phase using statistical parametric mapping
- Longitudinal plasma proteome profiling after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: heterogeneous development and associations with acute GvHD
BibTeX
@misc{johnson2026climate,
title = {{The Climate Stance Inventory: Development and validation in a large longitudinal sample of UK adults}},
author = {Leo Johnson and Orestis Zavlis and Laurence Wainwright and Omid V. Ebrahimi},
howpublished = {PsyArXiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.31234/osf.io/4tnsd_v1},
url = {https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/4tnsd_v1/},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - The Climate Stance Inventory: Development and validation in a large longitudinal sample of UK adults
AU - Leo Johnson
AU - Orestis Zavlis
AU - Laurence Wainwright
AU - Omid V. Ebrahimi
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/04
PB - PsyArXiv
DO - 10.31234/osf.io/4tnsd_v1
UR - https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/4tnsd_v1/
AB - The climate attitude–behaviour gap persists, with individual variables explaining limited behavioural variance. To address this problem, we develop and validate the Climate Stance Inventory (CSI), a continuous measure of 15 recurring orientations towards climate change and climate action derived from the Norm Activation Model. In a three-wave longitudinal study, 1,503 adults from the United Kingdom completed the CSI and measures of climate appraisals and environmental behaviour over approximately 10 weeks. Across waves, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses identified a 15-factor solution that exhibited good fit (CFI = .979, RMSEA = .034), high internal consistency (α/ω = .69–.88) and test-retest correlations (r = .58–.89) and full longitudinal measurement invariance. Climate stances showed theoretically coherent associations with threat certainty, responsibility-related appraisals, efficacy, institutional trust and pro-environmental behaviour. In hierarchical regressions, they explained substantial additional variance beyond demographic characteristics and climate change anxiety in pro-environmental voting (14.2%), workplace behaviour (19.5%) and behaviour outside work (22.4%). The Bystander stance also explained unique variance beyond a conceptually adjacent established barrier measure. These findings support the CSI as a reliable, temporally stable and substantively valid measure that can distinguish different psychological routes to climate (in)action and support the development and evaluation of more targeted climate-belief interventions.
ER -