Expected professional competencies articulated in learning outcomes for novice nursing students in early nursing home placements: a document analysis
5 affiliations
- 1Faculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Nord University, Campus Vesterålen, Storgata 105, Leknes, 8370 Norway
- 2Department of Health and Nursing Science, University of Agder, Campus Grimstad, Jon Lilletuns vei 9, Grimstad, 4879 Norway
- 3Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Department of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Campus Porsgrunn, Kjølnes Ring 56, Porsgrunn, 3918 Norway
- 4Lovisenberg Diaconal University College, Lovisenberggata 15B, Oslo, 0456 Norway
- 5Centre for Senior Citizen Staff, OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University, Pilestredet 46, Oslo, 0166 Norway
Abstract
Background: Clinical placements are central to the development of professional nursing competence, particularly in the first year of undergraduate education. In many countries, nursing students begin clinical education in nursing homes, where learning opportunities may vary and structured supervision can be limited. Clearly formulated learning outcomes are therefore essential for guiding learning, teaching and assessment. Despite extensive use of competence‑based frameworks and learning taxonomies, limited attention has been given to how professional competencies are articulated and taxonomically positioned in learning outcomes for first‑year nursing home placements.
Aim: To identify the professional competence areas articulated in learning outcomes for first‑year nursing students’ nursing home placements, and to examine how these outcomes are distributed across cognitive, affective and psychomotor learning domains and their associated taxonomic levels.
Methods: Learning outcomes formulated in subject plans for first‑year nursing home placements were analysed using a deductive document analysis approach. Outcomes were coded to predefined competence areas and mapped to cognitive, affective or psychomotor learning domains. Each outcome was classified as representing a low, intermediate or high taxonomic level. Frequency counts were used to identify patterns across institutions.
Findings: All five professional competence areas were represented; however, their distribution was uneven. Learning outcomes related to individualised care, particularly ethical values and communication, were most prevalent and spanned several taxonomic levels. In contrast, participatory decision‑making, cultural humility, evidence appraisal and higher‑order critical thinking were less frequently articulated and seldom positioned at high taxonomic levels. Across competence areas, learning outcomes were predominantly formulated at low and intermediate levels.
Conclusion: Learning outcomes for first‑year nursing home placements prioritise foundational competencies and safe participation in clinical practice but provide limited opportunities for early development of advanced clinical reasoning and evaluative judgement. Strengthening taxonomic progression in early learning outcomes may better support professional competence development from the outset of nursing education. These findings have implications for curriculum design, assessment alignment and clinical supervision in early health professions education.
Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-10048-6.
Related
- Long‐term market value after meniscal injury in professional football players largely follows expected career trajectories: A matched cohort study
- Nursing Competencies in Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS) in Spain: A Qualitative Study of Professional Profiles and Advanced Training.
- Experiential teaching centered on science popularisation videos: a randomised controlled trial on the impact on learning outcomes and core competencies of dental preventive medicine students
- Professional Identity Formation Through Reflection: Physicians’ Sensemaking of Past Learning Experiences and Current Practices
- Perceived learning characteristics and professional competency gaps among Korean Generation Z medical students: a mixed-methods study
BibTeX
@article{sjolie2026expected,
title = {{Expected professional competencies articulated in learning outcomes for novice nursing students in early nursing home placements: a document analysis}},
author = {Berit Mosseng Sjølie and Mette Kristin Ragnhildstveit Sætra and Monika Ravik and Hanne Maria Sørensen Bingen and Bjørg Christiansen and Marianne Trygg Solberg},
journal = {BMC Medical Education},
year = {2026},
month = jul,
doi = {10.1186/s12909-026-10048-6},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-10048-6},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Expected professional competencies articulated in learning outcomes for novice nursing students in early nursing home placements: a document analysis
AU - Berit Mosseng Sjølie
AU - Mette Kristin Ragnhildstveit Sætra
AU - Monika Ravik
AU - Hanne Maria Sørensen Bingen
AU - Bjørg Christiansen
AU - Marianne Trygg Solberg
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/07/30
JO - BMC Medical Education
DO - 10.1186/s12909-026-10048-6
UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-10048-6
AB - Background: Clinical placements are central to the development of professional nursing competence, particularly in the first year of undergraduate education. In many countries, nursing students begin clinical education in nursing homes, where learning opportunities may vary and structured supervision can be limited. Clearly formulated learning outcomes are therefore essential for guiding learning, teaching and assessment. Despite extensive use of competence‑based frameworks and learning taxonomies, limited attention has been given to how professional competencies are articulated and taxonomically positioned in learning outcomes for first‑year nursing home placements. Aim: To identify the professional competence areas articulated in learning outcomes for first‑year nursing students’ nursing home placements, and to examine how these outcomes are distributed across cognitive, affective and psychomotor learning domains and their associated taxonomic levels. Methods: Learning outcomes formulated in subject plans for first‑year nursing home placements were analysed using a deductive document analysis approach. Outcomes were coded to predefined competence areas and mapped to cognitive, affective or psychomotor learning domains. Each outcome was classified as representing a low, intermediate or high taxonomic level. Frequency counts were used to identify patterns across institutions. Findings: All five professional competence areas were represented; however, their distribution was uneven. Learning outcomes related to individualised care, particularly ethical values and communication, were most prevalent and spanned several taxonomic levels. In contrast, participatory decision‑making, cultural humility, evidence appraisal and higher‑order critical thinking were less frequently articulated and seldom positioned at high taxonomic levels. Across competence areas, learning outcomes were predominantly formulated at low and intermediate levels. Conclusion: Learning outcomes for first‑year nursing home placements prioritise foundational competencies and safe participation in clinical practice but provide limited opportunities for early development of advanced clinical reasoning and evaluative judgement. Strengthening taxonomic progression in early learning outcomes may better support professional competence development from the outset of nursing education. These findings have implications for curriculum design, assessment alignment and clinical supervision in early health professions education. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-10048-6.
SN - 1472-6920
ER -