Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,860 studies31 sourcesUpdated 8 min ago
PreprintCC BYmedRxiv

Objective peripheral neuropathy and protective-equipment use in a farming community in a lead-zinc mining district of south-eastern Nigeria: a cross-sectional study

  1. 1DAVID UMAHI FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCE

Abstract

ObjectivesTo estimate the prevalence of objective peripheral neuropathy, and to test whether self-reported use of personal protective equipment (PPE) is associated with lower neuropathy risk, among adults attending a community hospital in a Nigerian population exposed to both agrochemicals and mining.

DesignClinic-based cross-sectional study (June-November 2025), reported per STROBE.

SettingInfant Jesus Community Hospital, Ishiagu, Ebonyi State, a community combining smallholder farming with granite and lead-zinc mining.

Participants285 adults ([≥]18 years) attending the outpatient screening department; people with known diabetes were excluded.

Main outcome measuresPeripheral neuropathy on the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) examination -- an instrument validated in diabetic populations -- defined a priori as an abnormal 10 g monofilament test or absent/reduced ankle reflexes; three alternative case definitions were pre-specified. PPE use was scored 0-12. Associations were estimated by multivariable logistic regression adjusted for age and sex.

ResultsThe proportion screening positive was 47.0% (95% CI 41.2-52.8) under the primary definition and ranged from 29.8% to 56.8% across definitions. PPE use was near-absent (89.1% never used gloves; 43.2% used none) and showed no detectable protective association (adjusted OR 0.97 per point, 95% CI 0.88-1.06). Men used PPE more than twice as often as women (55.1% vs 24.5%, p<0.001), yet neuropathy did not differ by sex (41.6% vs 49.5%, p=0.27). Only age was associated with neuropathy (adjusted OR 1.02 per year, p=0.02).

ConclusionsNearly half of the adults sampled screened positive for peripheral neuropathy, and protective equipment showed no detectable protective association. Because PPE use was near-absent, the study cannot separate ineffective protection from too little protection to measure, and the cross-sectional design precludes causal inference. The equal burden across sexes despite markedly unequal protective behaviour is consistent with community-wide environmental exposure; reducing the total toxic load is a plausible priority that direct exposure measurement should now test.

Related

  1. Occupational heat stress in nurses working in hot environments and wearing personal protective equipment: mechanisms, health and safety implications, and prevention
    Xiaoxue Xu, Xuemei Wei
    Frontiers in Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Epidemiology & public healthFrontiersCrossref
  2. Protecting the invisible health workforce: experiences and occupational safety challenges of facial protective equipment use among central sterile supply department workers
    Huiling Rao, Aliya Tuerdi, Xue Zhou +1
    Frontiers in Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textInfectious diseaseCrossrefEurope PMCPMC
  3. Systemic Sclerosis Presenting With Long-Standing Peripheral Neuropathy and Delayed Multisystem Manifestations: A Case Report
    Bhargavan PV, Sila Chandran, Aswin US +2
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Topical herbal medicine as treatment for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
    Carrie Shao, Cassie Shao, Andrew Haggarty +2
    Frontiers in oncologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyEurope PMC
  5. Diabetes and the Nervous System: Linking Peripheral Neuropathy to Central Neurodegeneration
    Md. Mahmudul Hoque, Shamima Akter, Mayank Choubey +9
    Current Diabetes ReviewsPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text5 citedNeurologyOpenAlex
BibTeX
@misc{abanni2026objective,
  title = {{Objective peripheral neuropathy and protective-equipment use in a farming community in a lead-zinc mining district of south-eastern Nigeria: a cross-sectional study}},
  author = {S. I. Abanni and C. Adache and B. M. Ekure and J. Omotosho},
  howpublished = {medRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.09.21.26363549},
  url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.21.26363549v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Objective peripheral neuropathy and protective-equipment use in a farming community in a lead-zinc mining district of south-eastern Nigeria: a cross-sectional study
AU  - S. I. Abanni
AU  - C. Adache
AU  - B. M. Ekure
AU  - J. Omotosho
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/21
PB  - medRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.09.21.26363549
UR  - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.21.26363549v1
AB  - ObjectivesTo estimate the prevalence of objective peripheral neuropathy, and to test whether self-reported use of personal protective equipment (PPE) is associated with lower neuropathy risk, among adults attending a community hospital in a Nigerian population exposed to both agrochemicals and mining.  DesignClinic-based cross-sectional study (June-November 2025), reported per STROBE.  SettingInfant Jesus Community Hospital, Ishiagu, Ebonyi State, a community combining smallholder farming with granite and lead-zinc mining.  Participants285 adults ([≥]18 years) attending the outpatient screening department; people with known diabetes were excluded.  Main outcome measuresPeripheral neuropathy on the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) examination -- an instrument validated in diabetic populations -- defined a priori as an abnormal 10 g monofilament test or absent/reduced ankle reflexes; three alternative case definitions were pre-specified. PPE use was scored 0-12. Associations were estimated by multivariable logistic regression adjusted for age and sex.  ResultsThe proportion screening positive was 47.0% (95% CI 41.2-52.8) under the primary definition and ranged from 29.8% to 56.8% across definitions. PPE use was near-absent (89.1% never used gloves; 43.2% used none) and showed no detectable protective association (adjusted OR 0.97 per point, 95% CI 0.88-1.06). Men used PPE more than twice as often as women (55.1% vs 24.5%, p<0.001), yet neuropathy did not differ by sex (41.6% vs 49.5%, p=0.27). Only age was associated with neuropathy (adjusted OR 1.02 per year, p=0.02).  ConclusionsNearly half of the adults sampled screened positive for peripheral neuropathy, and protective equipment showed no detectable protective association. Because PPE use was near-absent, the study cannot separate ineffective protection from too little protection to measure, and the cross-sectional design precludes causal inference. The equal burden across sexes despite markedly unequal protective behaviour is consistent with community-wide environmental exposure; reducing the total toxic load is a plausible priority that direct exposure measurement should now test.
ER  -