Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 1 h ago
PreprintCC BYbioRxiv

Specificity-driven protein binder design with Odin-Multi

  1. 1Department of Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark; Center for Translational Protein Design, Technical Univer

Abstract

A useful protein binder is defined as much by what it does not bind as by what it does. Some applications call for one binder to cover a family of related targets; others require it to distinguish a single member from near-identical relatives. Yet, widely used deep-learning-based de novo design methods typically optimise one interaction at a time, leaving cross-reactivity and specificity to emerge during downstream screening. Here we present Odin-Multi, a binder design framework that optimises a shared binder sequence against several complexes simultaneously, applying attractive objectives to on-targets and repulsive objectives to off-targets. We benchmarked Odin-Multi in silico across three systems representing distinct cross-reactivity and specificity challenges: class B1 G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), testing cross-reactivity across multiple therapeutically relevant receptors; short-chain three-finger toxins, testing cross-reactivity across homologous toxin family members; and peptide-MHC (pMHC) complexes, testing specificity between near-identical target and off-target surfaces. For pairs of related class B1 GPCRs, 83.5 to 96.8% of jointly optimised designs exceeded an interaction-confidence threshold for both targets, compared with 6.8 to 36.3% of designs from single-target campaigns. For two short-chain three-finger neurotoxins, 9.2% of jointly optimised designs exceeded the corresponding threshold for both targets, compared with 0.8% of designs optimised against one toxin alone. Finally, in a pMHC specificity benchmark where target and off-target differed only in a single peptide residue, counter-selection increased the fraction of designs satisfying both the target-confidence criterion and a target-to-off-target interaction-confidence ratio of 2.5 from 6.0% to 14.2%. Experimental screening produced leads consistent with both design regimes in the two systems tested in vitro. We identified a cross-reactive toxin minibinder showing apparent nanomolar binding to the neurotoxin Erabutoxin A and to a candidate NK-shNTx-containing fraction from Naja kaouthia venom (higher-affinity fitted components of 11.95 and 34.43 nM, respectively), and a pMHC minibinder with greater target-to-off-target discrimination than a previously reported design. By treating cross-reactivity and specificity as explicit design objectives rather than screening outcomes, Odin-Multi widens the range of binding behaviours accessible to computational design.

Related

  1. LPT: Orchestrating bounded agentic loops for automated protein binder design
    M. Uckelmann
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textBioinformatics & computational biologybioRxiv
  2. Projected Gradient Descent for Hallucination-Based Protein Binder Design
    M. Ross, D. Miller, J. Wells
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textBioinformatics & computational biologybioRxiv
  3. Multi-omics analysis reveals protein-driven modulation of growth and metabolism in Gangba sheep under different dietary protein levels
    Xinyan Chen, Gesang Jiacuo, Pingcuo Bandan +3
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textPlant biologyCrossref
  4. De novo design of CR2 binder as vaccine scaffold
    Y.-T. Liu, Y.-N. Yin, H.-Q. Xu +11
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textImmunologybioRxiv
  5. Agentic campaign control for high-throughput de novo binder design
    M. Jeon, J. Song, J. Kim +1
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull text1 citedSystems & synthetic biologybioRxiv
BibTeX
@misc{brasas2026specificitydriven,
  title = {{Specificity-driven protein binder design with Odin-Multi}},
  author = {V. Brasas and C. R. Christensen and K. H. Björnsson and V. E. Moller and B. Scapolo and M. Benard-Valle and M. M. Nygaard and J. C. Nielsen and S. R. Hadrup and K. H. Johansen and T. P. Jenkins},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.09.08.749745},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.08.749745v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Specificity-driven protein binder design with Odin-Multi
AU  - V. Brasas
AU  - C. R. Christensen
AU  - K. H. Björnsson
AU  - V. E. Moller
AU  - B. Scapolo
AU  - M. Benard-Valle
AU  - M. M. Nygaard
AU  - J. C. Nielsen
AU  - S. R. Hadrup
AU  - K. H. Johansen
AU  - T. P. Jenkins
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/08
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.09.08.749745
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.08.749745v1
AB  - A useful protein binder is defined as much by what it does not bind as by what it does. Some applications call for one binder to cover a family of related targets; others require it to distinguish a single member from near-identical relatives. Yet, widely used deep-learning-based de novo design methods typically optimise one interaction at a time, leaving cross-reactivity and specificity to emerge during downstream screening. Here we present Odin-Multi, a binder design framework that optimises a shared binder sequence against several complexes simultaneously, applying attractive objectives to on-targets and repulsive objectives to off-targets. We benchmarked Odin-Multi in silico across three systems representing distinct cross-reactivity and specificity challenges: class B1 G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), testing cross-reactivity across multiple therapeutically relevant receptors; short-chain three-finger toxins, testing cross-reactivity across homologous toxin family members; and peptide-MHC (pMHC) complexes, testing specificity between near-identical target and off-target surfaces. For pairs of related class B1 GPCRs, 83.5 to 96.8% of jointly optimised designs exceeded an interaction-confidence threshold for both targets, compared with 6.8 to 36.3% of designs from single-target campaigns. For two short-chain three-finger neurotoxins, 9.2% of jointly optimised designs exceeded the corresponding threshold for both targets, compared with 0.8% of designs optimised against one toxin alone. Finally, in a pMHC specificity benchmark where target and off-target differed only in a single peptide residue, counter-selection increased the fraction of designs satisfying both the target-confidence criterion and a target-to-off-target interaction-confidence ratio of 2.5 from 6.0% to 14.2%. Experimental screening produced leads consistent with both design regimes in the two systems tested in vitro. We identified a cross-reactive toxin minibinder showing apparent nanomolar binding to the neurotoxin Erabutoxin A and to a candidate NK-shNTx-containing fraction from Naja kaouthia venom (higher-affinity fitted components of 11.95 and 34.43 nM, respectively), and a pMHC minibinder with greater target-to-off-target discrimination than a previously reported design. By treating cross-reactivity and specificity as explicit design objectives rather than screening outcomes, Odin-Multi widens the range of binding behaviours accessible to computational design.
ER  -