Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
182,544 studies31 sourcesUpdated 38 min ago
PreprintCC BYbioRxiv

LPT: Orchestrating bounded agentic loops for automated protein binder design

  1. 1Hubrecht Institute

Abstract

Current large language models (LLMs) can reason over scientific information and use code-based tools, but their training knowledge is broad rather than specialized, can be out of date and is hard to attribute to sources. Furthermore, unconstrained agentic workflows and unlimited tool use can consume large amounts of tokens. Here we present LPT (little protein tiger), a framework for fixed orchestration of LLM stages, each running a bounded agentic loop with custom system prompts and tool access, to enable de novo protein binder design from a single natural language prompt. The LLM stages can query a curated literature database, containing ~14000 papers digested into key findings, enabling recall of specialized information. An LLM with database access answered 41/48 test questions drawn from database key findings correctly, while a model without access answered none. In three end-to-end design campaigns, initiated from a single prompt, LPT autonomously identified the design intent, selected targets, structures and hotspot residues and designed candidate binders to disrupt CALCRL/RAMP1, PD-1/PD-L1 and PVR-TIGIT interactions. Cross-validation with multiple folding models confirms a high in silico success rate at minimal token consumption and low computational costs.

Related

  1. Agentic campaign control for high-throughput de novo binder design
    M. Jeon, J. Song, J. Kim +1
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull text1 citedSystems & synthetic biologybioRxiv
  2. Projected Gradient Descent for Hallucination-Based Protein Binder Design
    M. Ross, D. Miller, J. Wells
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textBioinformatics & computational biologybioRxiv
  3. Specificity-driven protein binder design with Odin-Multi
    V. Brasas, C. R. Christensen, K. H. Björnsson +8
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textSystems & synthetic biologybioRxiv
  4. Agentic BAIM-LLM Evaluation (ABLE): Benchmarking LLM Use of Protein Design Tools
    Bryce Cai, Geetha Jeyapragasan, Samira Nedungadi +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full text1 citedBioinformatics & computational biologyarXiv
  5. Agentic-AI-ready genome-wide poxvirus-host interaction screen refined by a protein language model
    J. Anter, J. Mercer, A. Yakimovich
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NCFull textSystems & synthetic biologybioRxiv
BibTeX
@misc{uckelmann2026orchestrating,
  title = {{LPT: Orchestrating bounded agentic loops for automated protein binder design}},
  author = {M. Uckelmann},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.10.29.762730},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.29.762730v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - LPT: Orchestrating bounded agentic loops for automated protein binder design
AU  - M. Uckelmann
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/29
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.10.29.762730
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.29.762730v1
AB  - Current large language models (LLMs) can reason over scientific information and use code-based tools, but their training knowledge is broad rather than specialized, can be out of date and is hard to attribute to sources. Furthermore, unconstrained agentic workflows and unlimited tool use can consume large amounts of tokens. Here we present LPT (little protein tiger), a framework for fixed orchestration of LLM stages, each running a bounded agentic loop with custom system prompts and tool access, to enable de novo protein binder design from a single natural language prompt. The LLM stages can query a curated literature database, containing ~14000 papers digested into key findings, enabling recall of specialized information. An LLM with database access answered 41/48 test questions drawn from database key findings correctly, while a model without access answered none. In three end-to-end design campaigns, initiated from a single prompt, LPT autonomously identified the design intent, selected targets, structures and hotspot residues and designed candidate binders to disrupt CALCRL/RAMP1, PD-1/PD-L1 and PVR-TIGIT interactions. Cross-validation with multiple folding models confirms a high in silico success rate at minimal token consumption and low computational costs.
ER  -