Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 26 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

The devil in the transition: NLO nucleation and the particle physics behind the PTA signal

Abstract

We quantify how the treatment of a strongly supercooled phase transition affects the particle-physics interpretation of a nanohertz gravitational-wave signal. For the classically conformal Abelian Higgs model, we calculate the nucleation rate at NLO in the dimensionally reduced theory and test the gradient expansion against explicit fluctuation determinants. A calibrated correction reproduces the determinant exponent with a mean absolute relative difference of 0.8% and allows this information to be included throughout the parameter scan. We propagate the corrected rate through percolation, reheating and gravitational-wave production, and confront the resulting spectra with the NANOGrav 15-year and IPTA DR2 data. The corrected NLO calculation shifts the preferred gauge coupling by 9% and 13%, respectively, and the input scale by 18% for NANOGrav. After the determinant calibration, the largest theoretical uncertainties arise from uncertainties in the gravitational-wave spectra and the relation between R⋆ and β/H.

Related

  1. Results of Classical and Nonclassical theories of nucleation for ordering transition in barium titanate
    V. Sobolev, T. Liebsch
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCondensed matterarXiv
  2. Towards accurate gravitational wave predictions: gauge-invariant nucleation in the electroweak phase transition
    Jie Liu, Renhui Qin, Ligong Bian
    Journal of High Energy PhysicsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textHigh-energy & particle physicsCrossref
  3. Robust skyrmion nucleation and transport via composition gradient in rare earth-transition metal ferrimagnets
    Pietro Diona, Luca Maranzana, Sergey Artyukhin
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textApplied physics & instrumentationCondensed matterarXiv
  4. From High Energy Astrophysical Neutrinos to the Nobel : The History, Legacy and Science Behind the 2026 Nobel Prize in Physics
    Dr. Maibam Ricky Devi
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textHigh-energy & particle physicsarXiv
  5. Nucleation and phase transition of spherical crystals and quasicrystals
    Tiejun Zhou, Aibei Xie, Gang Cui +3
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCondensed matterarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{puchadesibanez2026devil,
  title = {{The devil in the transition: NLO nucleation and the particle physics behind the PTA signal}},
  author = {Cristina Puchades-Ibáñez and Pedro Schwaller},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.12098},
  eprint = {2609.12098},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.12098},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - The devil in the transition: NLO nucleation and the particle physics behind the PTA signal
AU  - Cristina Puchades-Ibáñez
AU  - Pedro Schwaller
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/10
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.12098
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.12098
AB  - We quantify how the treatment of a strongly supercooled phase transition affects the particle-physics interpretation of a nanohertz gravitational-wave signal. For the classically conformal Abelian Higgs model, we calculate the nucleation rate at NLO in the dimensionally reduced theory and test the gradient expansion against explicit fluctuation determinants. A calibrated correction reproduces the determinant exponent with a mean absolute relative difference of 0.8% and allows this information to be included throughout the parameter scan. We propagate the corrected rate through percolation, reheating and gravitational-wave production, and confront the resulting spectra with the NANOGrav 15-year and IPTA DR2 data. The corrected NLO calculation shifts the preferred gauge coupling by 9% and 13%, respectively, and the input scale by 18% for NANOGrav. After the determinant calibration, the largest theoretical uncertainties arise from uncertainties in the gravitational-wave spectra and the relation between R_⋆ and β/H.
ER  -