Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 34 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Casimir-electrostatic pull-in in nanoelectromechanical actuators: Differentiable design sensitivities and the damping-dependent collapse boundary

Abstract

Nanoelectromechanical actuators operating at sub-100-nm gaps collapse through a pull-in instability set by competing electrostatic and Casimir forces. The quasi-static fold that bounds their safe operating range has been known in closed form for three decades, together with the Casimir ceiling above which no static equilibrium survives, which fixes the smallest gap a given stiffness and area can hold open against the quantum vacuum. That fold does not give the threshold reached from rest, its dependence on damping, or the design sensitivities of either. We train a physics-informed neural network in a rapidity coordinate that maps the movable pull-in pole to infinity, which keeps the residual bounded across the collapse threshold where fixed-step Runge-Kutta integration steps into unphysical states. Differentiating the trained surrogate returns pull-in-voltage sensitivities that match the closed-form fold to a relative error of 3×10−6 and inverts a device specification to a gap of 97.036 nm at a target actuation voltage. Applied to the from-rest boundary, which carries no closed form once the damping is finite, it supplies the same sensitivities where no analytic root exists. We prove that this boundary is bracketed by two closed-form curves, that it is nondecreasing in the damping ratio, that it merges with the fold once the damping ratio exceeds 2−1/4, and that the gap closes as (τ*−τ)2/5. Numerically the merger already occurs at $0.396$, and the growth of the collapse time changes there from logarithmic to inverse square root. The classical-limit bound on the thermal Lifshitz derating is at the percent level, and the physical shift at these gaps lies orders of magnitude below it.

Related

  1. High-Voltage Optocoupler Amplifier for Electrostatic Actuators
    George C. Jurgiel, Alex S. Miller, Jeffrey H. Lang
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textApplied physics & instrumentationarXiv
  2. Mapping data sensitivities in global QCD analysis with linear response and influence functions
    R.M. Whitehill
    Physics Letters BPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0High-energy & particle physicsCrossref
  3. Sensitivities of long and medium baseline experiments to sterile neutrinos and non-standard interactions
    Sambit Kumar Pusty, Trisha Guin, Rukmani Mohanta
    Physics Letters BPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textHigh-energy & particle physicsCrossref
  4. Ambient Pressure-Driven Actuators and Shape-Morphing Metamaterials
    Benjamin Holdstock, Robert Trowbridge, Alexander W. Powell +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textApplied physics & instrumentationarXiv
  5. Adaptive Substrate Support Based on Thin-Film Piezoelectric Actuators
    Ertuğ Şimşek, Bas Jansen, Marcelo Ackermann +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textApplied physics & instrumentationCondensed matterarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{akintsov2026casimirelectrostatic,
  title = {{Casimir-electrostatic pull-in in nanoelectromechanical actuators: Differentiable design sensitivities and the damping-dependent collapse boundary}},
  author = {N. S. Akintsov and A. P. Nevecheria and S. N. Andreev and Qing-Hua Qin},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2608.28494},
  eprint = {2608.28494},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.28494},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Casimir-electrostatic pull-in in nanoelectromechanical actuators: Differentiable design sensitivities and the damping-dependent collapse boundary
AU  - N. S. Akintsov
AU  - A. P. Nevecheria
AU  - S. N. Andreev
AU  - Qing-Hua Qin
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/28
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2608.28494
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.28494
AB  - Nanoelectromechanical actuators operating at sub-100-nm gaps collapse through a pull-in instability set by competing electrostatic and Casimir forces. The quasi-static fold that bounds their safe operating range has been known in closed form for three decades, together with the Casimir ceiling above which no static equilibrium survives, which fixes the smallest gap a given stiffness and area can hold open against the quantum vacuum. That fold does not give the threshold reached from rest, its dependence on damping, or the design sensitivities of either. We train a physics-informed neural network in a rapidity coordinate that maps the movable pull-in pole to infinity, which keeps the residual bounded across the collapse threshold where fixed-step Runge-Kutta integration steps into unphysical states. Differentiating the trained surrogate returns pull-in-voltage sensitivities that match the closed-form fold to a relative error of 3×10^−6 and inverts a device specification to a gap of 97.036 nm at a target actuation voltage. Applied to the from-rest boundary, which carries no closed form once the damping is finite, it supplies the same sensitivities where no analytic root exists. We prove that this boundary is bracketed by two closed-form curves, that it is nondecreasing in the damping ratio, that it merges with the fold once the damping ratio exceeds 2^−1/4, and that the gap closes as (τ_*−τ)^2/5. Numerically the merger already occurs at $0.396$, and the growth of the collapse time changes there from logarithmic to inverse square root. The classical-limit bound on the thermal Lifshitz derating is at the percent level, and the physical shift at these gaps lies orders of magnitude below it.
ER  -