Wood Chips Versus Barrels in Beer Maturation: Chemical, Sensory, Microbiological, and Operational–Economic Perspectives
- 1Department of Business Informatics and Management Engineering, Faculty of Management, AGH University of Krakow, Mickiewicza Av. 30, 30-059 Kraków, Poland
- 2Department of Fermentation Technology and Microbiology, Faculty of Food Technology, University of Agriculture, Balicka Street 122, 30-149 Kraków, Poland
Abstract
Wood contact is a common method for modifying the chemical and sensory properties of beer, although its effects depend strongly on wood form and processing conditions. This narrative review summarises the use of wood chips during beer maturation and compares them with barrel and untreated storage in terms of chemical, sensory, microbiological and operational outcomes. Direct beer studies comparing wood chips, barrels and untreated controls under identical conditions are limited. Consequently, evidence concerning microbiological behaviour, operational performance and some maturation mechanisms is partly derived from barrel studies, model systems, or other alcoholic beverages and interpreted as indirect evidence. The review evaluates the influence of wood species, toasting level, different physicochemical conditions, reuse and beer composition on the extraction of phenolic, furanic, and volatile compounds and their sensory effects. Compared with chips, barrels provide a more complex environment through gradual extraction, micro-oxygenation and, in some beer styles, microbial succession. The review also assesses implementation, sanitation, reuse, costs, consumer acceptance and environmental aspects. Future research should focus on standardized methodologies, direct chip–barrel–control comparisons, microbiological validation, techno-economic analyses, life-cycle assessment and consumer studies.
Related
- Application of Chitosan-Based Coatings Incorporating Sea Fennel Essential Oil and Rosemary Extract on the Chemical and Microbiological Characteristics of Sardine (Sardina pilchardus) and Gilthead Seabream (Sparus aurata)
- Polymers for Detecting or Protecting Against Chemical Warfare Agents: Recent Advances and Future Perspectives
- An interdisciplinary approach to sampling hard rock cores of the oceanic crust for microbiological and biogeochemical research
- Structural Analysis of HRF-4467, a Potent Second-Generation HIV-1 Maturation Inhibitor
- Natural Beeswax-Seed Oil Coatings for Shell Eggs: Effects on Physicochemical, Functional, and Microbiological Quality during Chilled Storage
BibTeX
@article{jaminski2026wood,
title = {{Wood Chips Versus Barrels in Beer Maturation: Chemical, Sensory, Microbiological, and Operational–Economic Perspectives}},
author = {Maciej Jamiński and Paweł Satora},
journal = {Molecules},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3390/molecules31203741},
url = {https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/31/20/3741},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Wood Chips Versus Barrels in Beer Maturation: Chemical, Sensory, Microbiological, and Operational–Economic Perspectives
AU - Maciej Jamiński
AU - Paweł Satora
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/01
JO - Molecules
DO - 10.3390/molecules31203741
UR - https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/31/20/3741
AB - Wood contact is a common method for modifying the chemical and sensory properties of beer, although its effects depend strongly on wood form and processing conditions. This narrative review summarises the use of wood chips during beer maturation and compares them with barrel and untreated storage in terms of chemical, sensory, microbiological and operational outcomes. Direct beer studies comparing wood chips, barrels and untreated controls under identical conditions are limited. Consequently, evidence concerning microbiological behaviour, operational performance and some maturation mechanisms is partly derived from barrel studies, model systems, or other alcoholic beverages and interpreted as indirect evidence. The review evaluates the influence of wood species, toasting level, different physicochemical conditions, reuse and beer composition on the extraction of phenolic, furanic, and volatile compounds and their sensory effects. Compared with chips, barrels provide a more complex environment through gradual extraction, micro-oxygenation and, in some beer styles, microbial succession. The review also assesses implementation, sanitation, reuse, costs, consumer acceptance and environmental aspects. Future research should focus on standardized methodologies, direct chip–barrel–control comparisons, microbiological validation, techno-economic analyses, life-cycle assessment and consumer studies.
SN - 1420-3049
ER -