Inhalation exposure to methamphetamine in contaminated residences
- 1Century
Abstract
Current health risk assessments from thirdhand exposure to methamphetamine (meth) to occupants of contaminated residences when no cooking or use is still occurring assume that inhalation exposure is insignificant. After Wright et al. (2021) reported substantial meth concentrations in a contaminated residence, the present study was conducted to further test the hypothesis that concentrations were high enough to contribute to total occupant dose. Air sampling was conducted in contaminated residences that had been previously sampled for surface contamination. Samples were collected on personal sampling pumps in fixed locations on treated glass fiber filters is cassettes and analyzed by gas or liquid chromatography with mass spectroscopy. Sixty-nine samples were collected from eighteen residences for the study. Meth concentrations ranged from 0.02 to 15 g/m3. Concentrations in supply air vents were significantly higher than in return vents or in ambient air. Residences with no HVAC systems (baseboard heat) had airborne concentrations similar to residences with HVAC systems turned off, and lower than when HVAC was on. Whether a residence was occupied or not did not show differences. All data from residences with HVAC had a significant correlation with surface concentrations (R2 = 0.61) but some factors that affected results were not determined in the study. In the context of the risk assessment and regulatory standard established by California and adopted in several other states, the inhalation exposure would approximately double total occupant dose for infants, and this population would exceed the California reference dose by approximately 100%. Further studies should be conducted to refine these estimates and determine the factors that influence airborne concentrations.
Related
- Metabolism of trichloroethylene following inhalation exposure in mice
- Environmental and personal BTEX exposure and inhalation health risks in healthcare-waste treatment units
- Plasma untargeted metabolomics reveals distinct metabolic disturbances between sexes following inhalation of ultrafine particles and exposure to aircraft noise in mice
- Impact of prehospital olanzapine for methamphetamine intoxication on patient and system-level outcomes: a population-based retrospective cohort study.
- A Team‐Based Patient Engagement Approach to Selexipag Initiation and Maintenance in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (TEAM PAH): Real‐World Dosing Patterns and Persistence Among Patients With and Without a History of Methamphetamine Use
BibTeX
@misc{dennison2026inhalation,
title = {{Inhalation exposure to methamphetamine in contaminated residences}},
author = {J. Dennison},
howpublished = {medRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.64898/2026.10.02.26364615},
url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.02.26364615v1},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Inhalation exposure to methamphetamine in contaminated residences
AU - J. Dennison
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/02
PB - medRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.10.02.26364615
UR - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.02.26364615v1
AB - Current health risk assessments from thirdhand exposure to methamphetamine (meth) to occupants of contaminated residences when no cooking or use is still occurring assume that inhalation exposure is insignificant. After Wright et al. (2021) reported substantial meth concentrations in a contaminated residence, the present study was conducted to further test the hypothesis that concentrations were high enough to contribute to total occupant dose. Air sampling was conducted in contaminated residences that had been previously sampled for surface contamination. Samples were collected on personal sampling pumps in fixed locations on treated glass fiber filters is cassettes and analyzed by gas or liquid chromatography with mass spectroscopy. Sixty-nine samples were collected from eighteen residences for the study. Meth concentrations ranged from 0.02 to 15 g/m3. Concentrations in supply air vents were significantly higher than in return vents or in ambient air. Residences with no HVAC systems (baseboard heat) had airborne concentrations similar to residences with HVAC systems turned off, and lower than when HVAC was on. Whether a residence was occupied or not did not show differences. All data from residences with HVAC had a significant correlation with surface concentrations (R2 = 0.61) but some factors that affected results were not determined in the study. In the context of the risk assessment and regulatory standard established by California and adopted in several other states, the inhalation exposure would approximately double total occupant dose for infants, and this population would exceed the California reference dose by approximately 100%. Further studies should be conducted to refine these estimates and determine the factors that influence airborne concentrations.
ER -