Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,683 studies31 sourcesUpdated 37 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYAtmosphere

Development of a Qualitative Questionnaire for Indoor Air Quality Monitoring: A Scoping Review of Subjective Assessments in Studies Using Low-Cost Sensors

  1. 1Design & Health Lab, Department of Architecture, Built Environment and Construction Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy
  2. 2School of Architecture, Urban Planning and Construction Engineering (AUIC), Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy
  3. 3Unit of Exposure to Air Contaminant, Department of Environment and Health, Italian National Institute of Health (Istituto Superiore di Sanità), 00161 Rome, Italy

Abstract

Background: Individuals spend most of their time indoors, yet the influence of indoor environmental characteristics on cognitive, emotional, and physical health is often underestimated. Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) plays a critical role in preventing discomfort and health issues such as Sick Building Syndrome (SBS). This study proposes a methodological framework integrating quantitative data from low-cost sensors with qualitative assessments of user perception, enabling a comprehensive evaluation of IAQ and its impacts. Methods: To develop a qualitative questionnaire, a Scoping Review was conducted with Scopus, since the aim was to identify questionnaire components from previous studies rather than to synthesize intervention effects, as in a systematic review. Keywords related to IAQ, user perception, wellbeing, and pollutant monitoring in living and working environments were applied. Starting from 281 initial documents, only 35 were selected because they reported relevant surveys or questionnaires within the scope of the analysis. Results: Across the 35 included studies on living and working spaces, the most frequently reported questionnaire items were grouped into five thematic domains—demographic factors, health symptoms, user perceptions, building and occupancy conditions, and monitored pollutants—to support the development of the qualitative questionnaire. These five domains supported the development of the proposed qualitative questionnaire but are also readily scalable to living spaces. Conclusions: Based on these findings, a team designed a structured questionnaire covering lifestyle, demographics, workplace conditions, perceived air quality, and related symptoms. This tool supports parallel analyses of qualitative and quantitative data. The proposed framework fosters multidimensional interpretation and may inform design, management, and AI-driven approaches for improving IAQ assessment across diverse contexts.

Related

  1. Subjective word-finding complaints in older adults: Development and preliminary psychometric evaluation of a novel self-reported questionnaire
    F. El-Khaldi, A. Marier, P. Vitali +3
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textPsychiatry & mental healthmedRxiv
  2. Integrating ventilation assessments with IoT monitoring to evaluate indoor air quality in elementary schools of San Luis Potosí, México
    Salvador Ruiz-Correa, Rubén López-Revilla, Lina Riego-Ruiz +9
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textPharmacology & toxicologyCrossref
  3. Relationship between subjective socioeconomic status and depression in Chinese rural adolescents: positive youth development as a moderator
    Gaoran Chen, Zheng Zhou, Wenqi Chen +1
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Psychiatry & mental healthCrossref
  4. Development and Validation of the Food Expectation Questionnaire (FEX‐Q): An Image‐Based Instrument to Assess Food‐Related Perceptions and Symptom Expectations
    Ryo Katsumata, Stine Störsrud, Magnus Simrén +1
    Neurogastroenterology and motilityPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Development and Preliminary Psychometric Evaluation of a Questionnaire on Comprehensive Protection, Quality, and Humanization in Pediatric Hospital Care
    Germán Rojas Loyola, Begoña Polonio-López, Juan José Criado-Alvarez +1
    Pediatric reportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{yu2026development,
  title = {{Development of a Qualitative Questionnaire for Indoor Air Quality Monitoring: A Scoping Review of Subjective Assessments in Studies Using Low-Cost Sensors}},
  author = {Yong Yu and Alice Laghezza and Gaetano Settimo and Stefano Capolongo and Marco Gola},
  journal = {Atmosphere},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.3390/atmos17100943},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos17100943},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Development of a Qualitative Questionnaire for Indoor Air Quality Monitoring: A Scoping Review of Subjective Assessments in Studies Using Low-Cost Sensors
AU  - Yong Yu
AU  - Alice Laghezza
AU  - Gaetano Settimo
AU  - Stefano Capolongo
AU  - Marco Gola
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/01
JO  - Atmosphere
DO  - 10.3390/atmos17100943
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos17100943
AB  - Background: Individuals spend most of their time indoors, yet the influence of indoor environmental characteristics on cognitive, emotional, and physical health is often underestimated. Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) plays a critical role in preventing discomfort and health issues such as Sick Building Syndrome (SBS). This study proposes a methodological framework integrating quantitative data from low-cost sensors with qualitative assessments of user perception, enabling a comprehensive evaluation of IAQ and its impacts. Methods: To develop a qualitative questionnaire, a Scoping Review was conducted with Scopus, since the aim was to identify questionnaire components from previous studies rather than to synthesize intervention effects, as in a systematic review. Keywords related to IAQ, user perception, wellbeing, and pollutant monitoring in living and working environments were applied. Starting from 281 initial documents, only 35 were selected because they reported relevant surveys or questionnaires within the scope of the analysis. Results: Across the 35 included studies on living and working spaces, the most frequently reported questionnaire items were grouped into five thematic domains—demographic factors, health symptoms, user perceptions, building and occupancy conditions, and monitored pollutants—to support the development of the qualitative questionnaire. These five domains supported the development of the proposed qualitative questionnaire but are also readily scalable to living spaces. Conclusions: Based on these findings, a team designed a structured questionnaire covering lifestyle, demographics, workplace conditions, perceived air quality, and related symptoms. This tool supports parallel analyses of qualitative and quantitative data. The proposed framework fosters multidimensional interpretation and may inform design, management, and AI-driven approaches for improving IAQ assessment across diverse contexts.
SN  - 2073-4433
ER  -