Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 46 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-NDbioRxiv

Individual differences reveal shared computational structure in perceptual decision-making

  1. 1Georgia Institute of Technology

Abstract

To discover computational mechanisms of cognition, models typically specify a fixed psychological architecture, treating individual differences as variations within a predefined parameterization. Here, we take a different approach by using the population structure of individual differences to directly drive model discovery. We develop a low-rank neural network that uses this `population geometry' to learn shared computational components and participant-specific weights from trial-level choices, allowing cross-subject variation to constrain the model's architecture. Applied to perceptual decision-making in the Bernoulli Clicks Task across primary and replication datasets, out-of-sample prediction reveals a six-dimensional representation for individual differences: two continuous dimensions of temporal evidence weighting and two of choice-outcome history dependence, alongside participant-specific side bias and signal-to-noise ratio. This low-dimensional organization replicated in an independent dataset. Together, these findings reveal that seemingly disparate decision heuristics reflect different weightings over a small set of shared computational components, and establish a principled methodology for using behavioral variability to discover the mechanistic architecture of cognition.

Related

  1. Color naming needs a non-uniform perceptual prior: Individual differences in hue scaling and the vision–language interface
    David Henry Peterzell
    PsyArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNeurosciencePhysiologyOSF
  2. Individual differences in Game Transfer Phenomena are associated with creativity and positive schizotypy but not with perceptual priming
    J. C. Llamas-Alonso, L. Kvavilashvili, G. Georgiou +1
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textZoology & animal behaviourbioRxiv
  3. Artificial observers and real individual differences: A roadmap for a computational psychometrics of vision
    David Henry Peterzell
    PsyArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceOSF
  4. Individual differences in ethanol drinking meal structure are shaped by social environments
    Marie A. Doyle, Caitlyn M. Edwards, Sabrina D. Hallal +3
    Addiction NeurosciencePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeuroscienceDOAJ
  5. Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation boosts evidence accumulation during perceptual decision making
    Shiyong Su, Thomas Vanvoorden, Pierre Le Denmat +2
    iSciencePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full text4 citedNeuroscienceCell PressCrossrefEurope PMC
BibTeX
@misc{xue2026individual,
  title = {{Individual differences reveal shared computational structure in perceptual decision-making}},
  author = {J. Xue and S. F. Feng and H.-D. Xiong and S. Wang and R. C. Wilson},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.11.04.764343},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.11.04.764343v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Individual differences reveal shared computational structure in perceptual decision-making
AU  - J. Xue
AU  - S. F. Feng
AU  - H.-D. Xiong
AU  - S. Wang
AU  - R. C. Wilson
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/04
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.11.04.764343
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.11.04.764343v1
AB  - To discover computational mechanisms of cognition, models typically specify a fixed psychological architecture, treating individual differences as variations within a predefined parameterization. Here, we take a different approach by using the population structure of individual differences to directly drive model discovery. We develop a low-rank neural network that uses this `population geometry' to learn shared computational components and participant-specific weights from trial-level choices, allowing cross-subject variation to constrain the model's architecture. Applied to perceptual decision-making in the Bernoulli Clicks Task across primary and replication datasets, out-of-sample prediction reveals a six-dimensional representation for individual differences: two continuous dimensions of temporal evidence weighting and two of choice-outcome history dependence, alongside participant-specific side bias and signal-to-noise ratio. This low-dimensional organization replicated in an independent dataset. Together, these findings reveal that seemingly disparate decision heuristics reflect different weightings over a small set of shared computational components, and establish a principled methodology for using behavioral variability to discover the mechanistic architecture of cognition.
ER  -