Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,869 studies31 sourcesUpdated 15 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYAddiction Neuroscience

Individual differences in ethanol drinking meal structure are shaped by social environments

4 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Neurobiology, UMass Chan Medical School, USA; Brudnick Neuropsychiatric Research Institute, UMass Chan Medical School, USA; Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University, USA; Vanderbilt Center for Addiction Research, Vanderbilt University, USA
  2. 2Department of Neurobiology, UMass Chan Medical School, USA; Brudnick Neuropsychiatric Research Institute, UMass Chan Medical School, USA
  3. 3Vanderbilt Center for Addiction Research, Vanderbilt University, USA
  4. 4Department of Neurobiology, UMass Chan Medical School, USA; Brudnick Neuropsychiatric Research Institute, UMass Chan Medical School, USA; Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University, USA; Vanderbilt Center for Addiction Research, Vanderbilt University, USA; Corresponding author at: UMass Chan Medical School, 366 Plantation Street, N7.1001, Worcester, MA 01605-2324.

Abstract

Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is marked by substantial heterogeneity in drinking behaviors and health outcomes, underscoring the need for preclinical models that capture interindividual variability. We recently developed open-source capacitive lickometer systems for high-resolution monitoring of mouse fluid intake. Using LIQ PARTI and LIQ HD, we found substantial individual differences in alcohol intake that varied across sex and housing status in C57Bl/6 J mice. Here, we conducted an expanded secondary analysis of this continuous access ethanol drinking data to quantify behavioral variability in group- and singly-housed mice. We introduce a fluid “meal” analysis that integrates drinking across ethanol and water sippers to define discrete drinking episodes. Using this approach, we observed sex- and housing-dependent reorganization of drinking structure across group- and single-housed settings, with group-housed males exhibiting fewer but faster liquid meals. To further characterize multidimensional drinking patterns, we applied principal component analysis to meal variables and identified a “distributed meal” phenotype defined by more meals, reduced meal size, earlier drinking onset, and higher ethanol preference, that segregates by sex. Considering factors that influence behaviors in a social environment, we next examined whether social hierarchy was associated with these patterns using a tube test dominance assay. Social rank was unrelated to ethanol and meal measures; however, offensive dominance behavior positively correlated with principal component scores in males. Together, these findings demonstrate that high-resolution, longitudinal analysis of ethanol drinking reveals distinct behavioral phenotypes that are associated with key components of social behaviors, providing a potential framework for understanding heterogeneity in AUD-related drinking.

Related

  1. Individual differences reveal shared computational structure in perceptual decision-making
    J. Xue, S. F. Feng, H.-D. Xiong +2
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  2. Respiration and individual differences shape behavioral and inter-brain synchronization
    W. YI, C. Palmer
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  3. Individual Differences in Dopaminergic Modulation of Exploration–Exploitation Behavior
    Elke Smith, Hendrik Theis, Thilo van Eimeren +5
    The Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewedPublisher termsFull textNeurosciencePMC
  4. Multi-omics reveals accumulation mechanisms underlying differences in sesquiterpenoid content across different growth environments of Atractylodes macrocephala rhizome
    M. Chen, S. Yu, Y. Wang +7
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textPlant biologybioRxiv
  5. Why we hug: Individual differences predict emotional touch memories
    Anna Lena Dueren, Paul M Jenkinson, Aikaterini Vafeiadou +5
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeuroscienceEpidemiology & public healthPLOSEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@article{doyle2026individual,
  title = {{Individual differences in ethanol drinking meal structure are shaped by social environments}},
  author = {Marie A. Doyle and Caitlyn M. Edwards and Sabrina D. Hallal and Samuel M. Bond and Nicholas Petersen and Danny G. Winder},
  journal = {Addiction Neuroscience},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1016/j.addicn.2026.100290},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addicn.2026.100290},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Individual differences in ethanol drinking meal structure are shaped by social environments
AU  - Marie A. Doyle
AU  - Caitlyn M. Edwards
AU  - Sabrina D. Hallal
AU  - Samuel M. Bond
AU  - Nicholas Petersen
AU  - Danny G. Winder
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/30
JO  - Addiction Neuroscience
DO  - 10.1016/j.addicn.2026.100290
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addicn.2026.100290
AB  - Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is marked by substantial heterogeneity in drinking behaviors and health outcomes, underscoring the need for preclinical models that capture interindividual variability. We recently developed open-source capacitive lickometer systems for high-resolution monitoring of mouse fluid intake. Using LIQ PARTI and LIQ HD, we found substantial individual differences in alcohol intake that varied across sex and housing status in C57Bl/6 J mice. Here, we conducted an expanded secondary analysis of this continuous access ethanol drinking data to quantify behavioral variability in group- and singly-housed mice. We introduce a fluid “meal” analysis that integrates drinking across ethanol and water sippers to define discrete drinking episodes. Using this approach, we observed sex- and housing-dependent reorganization of drinking structure across group- and single-housed settings, with group-housed males exhibiting fewer but faster liquid meals. To further characterize multidimensional drinking patterns, we applied principal component analysis to meal variables and identified a “distributed meal” phenotype defined by more meals, reduced meal size, earlier drinking onset, and higher ethanol preference, that segregates by sex. Considering factors that influence behaviors in a social environment, we next examined whether social hierarchy was associated with these patterns using a tube test dominance assay. Social rank was unrelated to ethanol and meal measures; however, offensive dominance behavior positively correlated with principal component scores in males. Together, these findings demonstrate that high-resolution, longitudinal analysis of ethanol drinking reveals distinct behavioral phenotypes that are associated with key components of social behaviors, providing a potential framework for understanding heterogeneity in AUD-related drinking.
SN  - 2772-3925
ER  -