Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 6 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)

Psychologists' Perspectives of Service-Access Barriers for Syrian Children with Disabilities in a Turkish Refugee Camp.

  1. 1Special Education Department, College of Education, University of Hail, Hail 55476, Saudi Arabia.
  2. 2Special Education Department, College of Education, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh 11432, Saudi Arabia.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Syrian refugee children with disabilities face multiple barriers to accessing essential healthcare, education, psychological support, and protection services. These challenges are often compounded by displacement, poverty, language and documentation difficulties, and limited specialized services. This study aimed to explore these barriers and their interrelated challenges exclusively from the perspectives of practitioners working directly with this population within a refugee-camp context. Methods: A qualitative case study design was employed, utilizing purposive sampling to recruit 10 Syrian psychologists working directly with children with disabilities in a refugee camp in Hatay Province, Turkey. Data were gathered through semi-structured interviews and analyzed using Braun and Clarke's six-step thematic analysis. Data were therefore derived exclusively from practitioners' perspectives and did not include direct interviews or other data collected from children or caregivers. Results: Five interconnected domains of barriers were identified: trauma and mental health; limited access to general and specialized healthcare; documentation, language, and educational-system barriers; poverty and child labor; and unsafe living conditions and inadequate protection. Participants also described substantial family-level economic and caregiving pressures. However, because children and caregivers were not interviewed, the findings represent practitioner-informed perceptions rather than direct accounts of lived experience or population-level prevalence estimates. Conclusions: This study contributes to the limited literature by illustrating, from practitioners' perspectives, how disability, displacement, service-access constraints, and protection risks interact within a refugee-camp context. The findings support the development of inclusive and trauma-informed services, proactive screening and outreach initiatives, family-centered support, and coordinated responses across health, education, protection, and humanitarian sectors.

Related

  1. Psychologists' knowledge, attitudes, and training experiences regarding mental illness in individuals with intellectual disabilities in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study.
    Abeer Al Lihabi
    Frontiers in psychiatryPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCCrossref
  2. Barriers to and facilitators of gestational diabetes mellitus service utilization in Kenya: a qualitative analysis of women’s and healthcare workers’ perspectives
    Angela Obongo, Hannah Eger, Marie Tallarek +1
    BMC Health Services ResearchPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsPMC
  3. Psychological therapy for children and young people with a diagnosis of autism or intellectual disabilities in mainstream child and adolescent mental health services: a cross-sectional survey of clinicians’ perspectives in England
    Naomi Williams, Helena Tuomainen, Julie Taylor +6
    BMJ OpenPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral medicineCrossrefPMC
  4. Views on AI as an Instrument of Mental Health Care: Qualitative Perspectives of Psychologists from India and Nepal
    Sonal Paliwal, Priya Rajkumar, Pravanshu Kadu
    Asia Pacific Journal of Health ManagementPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textEpidemiology & public healthDOAJ
  5. Intersectional Barriers to and Facilitators of Educational Inclusion for Persons With Disabilities in Low‐ and Middle‐Income Countries: A Systematic Literature Review
    Yusufu Simra, Shani Omari, Hussein Mwanjali
    Health science reportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{alsawalem2026psychologists,
  title = {{Psychologists' Perspectives of Service-Access Barriers for Syrian Children with Disabilities in a Turkish Refugee Camp.}},
  author = {Ibraheem M Alsawalem and Abdulmalik Alkhunini},
  journal = {Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/healthcare14193258},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42881697},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Psychologists' Perspectives of Service-Access Barriers for Syrian Children with Disabilities in a Turkish Refugee Camp.
AU  - Ibraheem M Alsawalem
AU  - Abdulmalik Alkhunini
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)
DO  - 10.3390/healthcare14193258
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42881697
AB  - Background/Objectives: Syrian refugee children with disabilities face multiple barriers to accessing essential healthcare, education, psychological support, and protection services. These challenges are often compounded by displacement, poverty, language and documentation difficulties, and limited specialized services. This study aimed to explore these barriers and their interrelated challenges exclusively from the perspectives of practitioners working directly with this population within a refugee-camp context. Methods: A qualitative case study design was employed, utilizing purposive sampling to recruit 10 Syrian psychologists working directly with children with disabilities in a refugee camp in Hatay Province, Turkey. Data were gathered through semi-structured interviews and analyzed using Braun and Clarke's six-step thematic analysis. Data were therefore derived exclusively from practitioners' perspectives and did not include direct interviews or other data collected from children or caregivers. Results: Five interconnected domains of barriers were identified: trauma and mental health; limited access to general and specialized healthcare; documentation, language, and educational-system barriers; poverty and child labor; and unsafe living conditions and inadequate protection. Participants also described substantial family-level economic and caregiving pressures. However, because children and caregivers were not interviewed, the findings represent practitioner-informed perceptions rather than direct accounts of lived experience or population-level prevalence estimates. Conclusions: This study contributes to the limited literature by illustrating, from practitioners' perspectives, how disability, displacement, service-access constraints, and protection risks interact within a refugee-camp context. The findings support the development of inclusive and trauma-informed services, proactive screening and outreach initiatives, family-centered support, and coordinated responses across health, education, protection, and humanitarian sectors.
SN  - 2227-9032
ER  -