Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,541 studies31 sourcesUpdated 28 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Operations, Maintenance, and Industrial Scaling of MW-Class Orbital Data Centers

Abstract

Megawatt-class orbital data centers require continuous maintenance, replacement, inventory, and service capacity in addition to spacecraft power/thermal systems. We formulate an analytical lifecycle framework for permanent/transient failures, modular orbital replacement units, robotic servicing, spare inventory, scheduled technology refresh, correlated faults, cybersecurity, optional human support. The model combines nonhomogeneous component hazards, capacity-weighted availability, multiclass robotic-service capacity, Poisson base-stock inventory, replacement-flow accounting, human-support break-even relations. For a 1 MW cluster with 10 active 100 kW nodes, 1 reserve node, ~200 5 kW compute cartridges, low, nominal, high deployed-mass allocations span ~50-75 kg/kW. Assumptions yield 70.2 random or life-limited interventions and 323-349 planned refresh operations/(MW-year), for a total of 393-419 standardized operations/(MW-year). Analysis gives a first-generation logistics of 5.3-9.0 t/(MW-year), with a nominal case of ~ 6.6 t/(MW year), 560-700 productive robot-hors/(MW-year). Planned refresh exceeds random replacement under the stated component populations, hazards, 3-15-year intervals. At ~400 standardized operations/(MW-year), the post-internal-recovery exception probability is <10−3, with an objective near 10−4 at large scale; terminal non-recovery pU requires a smaller mission-level allocation. The target catastrophic-loss hazard for a 100 kW node is 0.01-0.03 1/yr. Parametric workload and cost cases place contingency visits at 10s of MWs, periodic campaigns at 10-100s of MWs, dedicated personnel at several 100 MWs to GWs. The reference first deployment is uncrewed, autonomously fault-managed, robotically maintainable, supported by specific inventory based on a 6-month replenishment horizon, compatible with later human access without permanent habitation.

Related

  1. Every Kilowatt Shines: Orbital Data Centers After Dark
    Juan A Fraire
    HALPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textInstrumentation & methodsGeneral physicsHAL
  2. Electrically tunable, two-photon interference from remote silicon-vacancy centers in industrial silicon carbide
    Fedor Dzmitryevich Hrunski, Daniel Scheller, Maximilian Hollendonner +8
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  3. High Sensitivity Fiber-Coupled Vector Magnetometry using NV Centers in a Femtosecond Laser-Written Diamond Waveguide
    Demininggus Pekei, Giulio Coccia, Argyri Giakoumaki +4
    Optics ExpressPeer-reviewedLicence not statedOptics & photonicsCrossref
  4. All-fiber quantum current transformer based on nitrogen-vacancy centers
    Qingtao Guo, Chenggang Guan, Jiaoli Gong +8
    Optics ExpressPeer-reviewedPublisher termsOptics & photonicsCrossref
  5. Trion-mediated quantum operations on a double-dot charge qubit
    Alexander Tsukanov
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCondensed matterarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{turyshev2026operations,
  title = {{Operations, Maintenance, and Industrial Scaling of MW-Class Orbital Data Centers}},
  author = {Slava G. Turyshev},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2608.27499},
  eprint = {2608.27499},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.27499},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Operations, Maintenance, and Industrial Scaling of MW-Class Orbital Data Centers
AU  - Slava G. Turyshev
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/27
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2608.27499
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.27499
AB  - Megawatt-class orbital data centers require continuous maintenance, replacement, inventory, and service capacity in addition to spacecraft power/thermal systems. We formulate an analytical lifecycle framework for permanent/transient failures, modular orbital replacement units, robotic servicing, spare inventory, scheduled technology refresh, correlated faults, cybersecurity, optional human support. The model combines nonhomogeneous component hazards, capacity-weighted availability, multiclass robotic-service capacity, Poisson base-stock inventory, replacement-flow accounting, human-support break-even relations. For a 1 MW cluster with 10 active 100 kW nodes, 1 reserve node, ~200 5 kW compute cartridges, low, nominal, high deployed-mass allocations span ~50-75 kg/kW. Assumptions yield 70.2 random or life-limited interventions and 323-349 planned refresh operations/(MW-year), for a total of 393-419 standardized operations/(MW-year). Analysis gives a first-generation logistics of 5.3-9.0 t/(MW-year), with a nominal case of ~ 6.6 t/(MW year), 560-700 productive robot-hors/(MW-year). Planned refresh exceeds random replacement under the stated component populations, hazards, 3-15-year intervals. At ~400 standardized operations/(MW-year), the post-internal-recovery exception probability is <10^−3, with an objective near 10^−4 at large scale; terminal non-recovery p_U requires a smaller mission-level allocation. The target catastrophic-loss hazard for a 100 kW node is 0.01-0.03 1/yr. Parametric workload and cost cases place contingency visits at 10s of MWs, periodic campaigns at 10-100s of MWs, dedicated personnel at several 100 MWs to GWs. The reference first deployment is uncrewed, autonomously fault-managed, robotically maintainable, supported by specific inventory based on a 6-month replenishment horizon, compatible with later human access without permanent habitation.
ER  -