Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,860 studies31 sourcesUpdated 14 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0SAGE Open Nursing

Development, Expert Validation, and Feasibility Testing of a Psychological Resilience Reinforcement Programme for Omani University Students: A Pilot Quasi-Experimental Study

4 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Community& Mental Health, College of Nursing, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman
  2. 2Sri Ramachandra Faculty of Nursing, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher education and Research(DU), Chennai, India
  3. 3Department of Maternal and Child Health, College of Nursing, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman
  4. 4Department of Psychiatry, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education &amp, Research (DU), Chennai, India

Abstract

Introduction: University students face significant mental health challenges that may be mitigated by strengthening their resilience. However, resilience-building programs for this population remain underexplored.

Objective: This feasibility pilot trial aimed to develop, validate, and explore the feasibility of a psychological resilience reinforcement programme for university students in Oman, with an exploratory evaluation of psychological outcomes.

Methods: A quasi-experimental, non-randomised design with two parallel groups; control and intervention was employed. Eligible students were conveniently recruited between November 2023 and February 2024 and allocated non-randomly. The intervention group (n = 25) completed two 45-minute sessions, while the control group (n = 25) received no intervention. The programme, grounded in positive psychology principles, included active coping, emotional awareness, self-regulation, impulse control, optimism, empathy, self-efficacy, challenging thinking traps, and the importance of social connections. Psychological well-being, coping, and psychological resilience were assessed at baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at three-month follow-up.

Results: The programme achieved a content validity index of 0.94, demonstrating excellent feasibility and acceptability, with 100% recruitment, retention, data completion, and follow-up rates and no reported adverse events. Exploratory, descriptive analysis revealed temporal changes in well-being (F (1.77,84.94) = 5.13, p = 0.008, ηp2 = 0.01) and coping (F (1.20,57.52) = 10.24, p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.18), but no statistically significant effects for resilience. However, these findings are exploratory, not causal.

Conclusion: The programme exhibited strong content validity and feasibility; however, no statistically significant effect on psychological outcomes was observed. Changes observed over time, including decline at three months are likely attributable to contextual influences rather than effect of the intervention. Findings suggest the need for a fully powered trial to evaluate effectiveness. This non-funded trial was registered with the Iranian Trial Registry.

Related

  1. Toward a National Tuberculosis Lateral-Flow Urine Lipoarabinomannan (LF-LAM) External Quality Assessment Program in Thailand: Feasibility Demonstration Through Panel Development, Validation, and Proficiency Testing, March 2025–April 2026
    Supaporn Suparak, Theerawit Tasaneeyapan, Petai Unpol +15
    Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Effects of video reinforcement following face-to-face CPR/AED training on knowledge, attitude, and simulated performance among frontline community workers: a quasi-experimental study with post-training randomized allocation
    Farzaneh Mirzaei, Ali Nasiri, Abbas Abbaszadeh +2
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0General medicineCrossref
  3. Validation of the Eco-Anxiety Questionnaire (EAQ-22) in Spanish young people: assessing the psychological impact of the ecological crisis
    Roser Sala, Silvia Germán, Sergi López-Asensio +1
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  4. Self-care recovery after ischemic stroke: a quasi-experimental comparison of two psychological interventions.
    Yueyuan Wang, Yousef Alsufayan, Roghaye Farhadi Hassankiadeh +3
    BMC psychologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCPMC
  5. The Master Adaptive Learner Behavioral Assessment Scale (MAL BAS): Development, Validity Evidence, Feasibility, and Acceptability of a New Instrument
    Wing Fu, Tricia R. Prokop, Rosa Elena Torres-Panchamé
    Medical Science EducatorPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textEpidemiology & public healthPMC
BibTeX
@article{yesodharan2026development,
  title = {{Development, Expert Validation, and Feasibility Testing of a Psychological Resilience Reinforcement Programme for Omani University Students: A Pilot Quasi-Experimental Study}},
  author = {Divya Kuzhivilayil Yesodharan and Judie Arulappan and Santhi S and Sabari Sridhar O T},
  journal = {SAGE Open Nursing},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.1177/23779608261491622},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608261491622},
  note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Development, Expert Validation, and Feasibility Testing of a Psychological Resilience Reinforcement Programme for Omani University Students: A Pilot Quasi-Experimental Study
AU  - Divya Kuzhivilayil Yesodharan
AU  - Judie Arulappan
AU  - Santhi S
AU  - Sabari Sridhar O T
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/21
JO  - SAGE Open Nursing
DO  - 10.1177/23779608261491622
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608261491622
AB  - Introduction: University students face significant mental health challenges that may be mitigated by strengthening their resilience. However, resilience-building programs for this population remain underexplored.  Objective: This feasibility pilot trial aimed to develop, validate, and explore the feasibility of a psychological resilience reinforcement programme for university students in Oman, with an exploratory evaluation of psychological outcomes.  Methods: A quasi-experimental, non-randomised design with two parallel groups; control and intervention was employed. Eligible students were conveniently recruited between November 2023 and February 2024 and allocated non-randomly. The intervention group (n = 25) completed two 45-minute sessions, while the control group (n = 25) received no intervention. The programme, grounded in positive psychology principles, included active coping, emotional awareness, self-regulation, impulse control, optimism, empathy, self-efficacy, challenging thinking traps, and the importance of social connections. Psychological well-being, coping, and psychological resilience were assessed at baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at three-month follow-up.  Results: The programme achieved a content validity index of 0.94, demonstrating excellent feasibility and acceptability, with 100% recruitment, retention, data completion, and follow-up rates and no reported adverse events. Exploratory, descriptive analysis revealed temporal changes in well-being (F (1.77,84.94) = 5.13, p = 0.008, ηp2 = 0.01) and coping (F (1.20,57.52) = 10.24, p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.18), but no statistically significant effects for resilience. However, these findings are exploratory, not causal.  Conclusion: The programme exhibited strong content validity and feasibility; however, no statistically significant effect on psychological outcomes was observed. Changes observed over time, including decline at three months are likely attributable to contextual influences rather than effect of the intervention. Findings suggest the need for a fully powered trial to evaluate effectiveness. This non-funded trial was registered with the Iranian Trial Registry.
SN  - 2377-9608
ER  -