Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 8 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0The European Journal of Public Health

Climate Change and Health Training Needs in Central European Mountain Regions: Cross-Country Survey

Abstract

Climate change poses growing health risks in mountainous regions, where populations face increased exposure to extreme events, geographic isolation, and limited healthcare access. Strengthening the health workforce through targeted education is essential for resilience. Within the EU-funded MOUNTADAPT project, this study compares climate–health training needs across four Central European sites (AT: Austria, FR: France, RO: Romania, SI: Slovenia) to inform capacity-building.

A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among healthcare professionals (Nov 2024–Mar 2025). The 42-item questionnaire assessed four domains: feelings, knowledge, training priorities, and training mode. Most items used ordinal scales (1 to 3-6). Between-country comparisons were based on descriptive statistics, Kruskal-Wallis test (mean ranges, min–max, shown when p < 0.05), and Spearman correlations (rs). A total of 1530 respondents participated (AT: 453; FR: 644; RO: 333; SI: 100). In the feelings domain, all countries reported high concern about climate–health impacts (3.7–4.8/6; RO vs FR), moderate responsibility (3.0–3.6/5; RO vs AT) and training uptake intention (3.5–3.7/5; RO, SL, FR vs AT), and low perceived community awareness (2.3–2.8/5; SI vs AT). Regarding knowledge, perceived severity of the impact of climate-related events correlated with knowledge levels (rs: 0.21–0.96; FR vs RO); high-impact/low-knowledge events emerged as priority training gaps. Training priorities were consistent across countries, led by basic climate-health information, disaster medicine, and clinical competencies for climate change management (2.5/4). Training mode preferences included flexible online or hybrid formats (55.5–79.2%; AT vs RO), with engagement limited to ≤ 2 hours/week. Cross-country variation highlights the need for coordinated yet context-adaptive educational strategies. High concern and limited training access (up to 80% in RO/SI vs 28.7% in AT) underscores the need for action.

Key messages: • Addressing training needs is essential to strengthen climate-resilient healthcare in vulnerable mountain settings.

• Coordinated action on climate change and health education is needed to reduce cross-country disparities.

Related

  1. UEG Summer School 2026 참가기: 유럽 소화기 술기 교육의 실제와 국내 교육에 대한 시사점 Report on the UEG Summer School 2026: Hands-on Training in European Gastroenterology and Its Implications for Training in Korea
    병철 진, 정현 노
    The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chiPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCPMC
  2. European training requirements for gynecological oncology: the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology Curriculum
    Blanca Gil-Ibañez, René Verheijen, Basel Refky +26
    International Journal of Gynecological CancerPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text3 citedEpidemiology & public healthHAL
  3. From scattered data to actionable knowledge: European Climate and Health Observatory
    A Kazmierczak
    The European Journal of Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textPharmacology & toxicologyPMCEurope PMC
  4. Dairy Consumption Across Generations—A Structural Equation Model of Central European Adults
    Ewa Halicka, Małgorzata Kosicka-Gębska, Jerzy Gębski +1
    NutrientsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0NutritionCrossref
  5. Climate and health capacity building for climate-resilient health systems: a case study of the ASPHER-GCCHE European course
    Eric P Twomey, Danielly de P Magalhães, Chiara Cadeddu +7
    The European Journal of Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPharmacology & toxicologyPMC
BibTeX
@article{perezvalencia2026climate,
  title = {{Climate Change and Health Training Needs in Central European Mountain Regions: Cross-Country Survey}},
  author = {DM Pérez-Valencia and C Las Hayas Rodríguez and C López-Rodríguez and S Romero-Yesa},
  journal = {The European Journal of Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.998},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.998},
  note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Climate Change and Health Training Needs in Central European Mountain Regions: Cross-Country Survey
AU  - DM Pérez-Valencia
AU  - C Las Hayas Rodríguez
AU  - C López-Rodríguez
AU  - S Romero-Yesa
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - The European Journal of Public Health
DO  - 10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.998
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.998
AB  - Climate change poses growing health risks in mountainous regions, where populations face increased exposure to extreme events, geographic isolation, and limited healthcare access. Strengthening the health workforce through targeted education is essential for resilience. Within the EU-funded MOUNTADAPT project, this study compares climate–health training needs across four Central European sites (AT: Austria, FR: France, RO: Romania, SI: Slovenia) to inform capacity-building.  A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among healthcare professionals (Nov 2024–Mar 2025). The 42-item questionnaire assessed four domains: feelings, knowledge, training priorities, and training mode. Most items used ordinal scales (1 to 3-6). Between-country comparisons were based on descriptive statistics, Kruskal-Wallis test (mean ranges, min–max, shown when p < 0.05), and Spearman correlations (rs). A total of 1530 respondents participated (AT: 453; FR: 644; RO: 333; SI: 100). In the feelings domain, all countries reported high concern about climate–health impacts (3.7–4.8/6; RO vs FR), moderate responsibility (3.0–3.6/5; RO vs AT) and training uptake intention (3.5–3.7/5; RO, SL, FR vs AT), and low perceived community awareness (2.3–2.8/5; SI vs AT). Regarding knowledge, perceived severity of the impact of climate-related events correlated with knowledge levels (rs: 0.21–0.96; FR vs RO); high-impact/low-knowledge events emerged as priority training gaps. Training priorities were consistent across countries, led by basic climate-health information, disaster medicine, and clinical competencies for climate change management (2.5/4). Training mode preferences included flexible online or hybrid formats (55.5–79.2%; AT vs RO), with engagement limited to ≤ 2 hours/week. Cross-country variation highlights the need for coordinated yet context-adaptive educational strategies. High concern and limited training access (up to 80% in RO/SI vs 28.7% in AT) underscores the need for action.  Key messages: • Addressing training needs is essential to strengthen climate-resilient healthcare in vulnerable mountain settings.  • Coordinated action on climate change and health education is needed to reduce cross-country disparities.
SN  - 1101-1262
SN  - 1464-360X
ER  -