Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 56 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYCancers

Efficacy and Safety of Daraxonrasib (RMC-6236) in Previously Treated Metastatic RAS-Mutated Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Systematic Review.

  1. 1Student Scientific Society, Department of Clinical Oncology and Chemotherapy, Medical University of Lublin, 20-059 Lublin, Poland.
  2. 2Department of Clinical Oncology and Chemotherapy, Medical University of Lublin, 20-059 Lublin, Poland.

Abstract

Introduction: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is associated with a poor prognosis, and RAS gene mutations are present in more than 90% of cases. For this reason, direct RAS inhibition is a promising, but thus far difficult to achieve, therapeutic strategy. Daraxonrasib (RMC-6236) is a first-in-class, oral, non-covalent, multiselective inhibitor of the active form of RAS. It forms an intracellular trimeric complex with cyclophilin A, blocking both mutant and wild-type variants of the KRAS, NRAS, and HRAS genes. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of daraxonrasib in previously treated patients with RAS-mutated PDAC. Methods: This review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov for studies published between January 2020 and July 2026. Two studies met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed: the Phase 1-2 RMC-6236-001 (n = 168) and the Phase 3 RASolute 302 trial (n = 500), involving a total of 668 patients. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool for the randomized trial and the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) tool. Results: In the RASolute 302 trial, daraxonrasib out performed investigator-selected chemotherapy in a population of patients with the RAS G12 mutation, improving median overall survival (13.2 vs. 6.6 months; HR 0.40), progression-free survival (7.3 vs. 3.5 months; HR 0.45), and objective response rate (33.2% vs. 11.8%; all p < 0.001), and also delayed the onset of pain and deterioration in quality of life. These results were consistent with the earlier RMC-6236-001 study (objective response rate [ORR] 35%, median overall survival [OS] 13.1 months in patients with RAS G12 mutation treated in the second-line setting). Daraxonrasib exhibited a predictable toxicity profile, consisting mainly of Grade 1-2 dermatologic and gastrointestinal symptoms, with lower rates of hematologic toxicity and treatment discontinuation than with chemotherapy. Conclusions: Daraxonrasib demonstrates clinically relevant and statistically significant efficacy with an acceptable safety profile in previously treated patients with metastatic RAS G12-mutated PDAC, the population for which the strongest randomized evidence is currently available. These findings support its potential as a promising new treatment option in this setting. Further studies are needed regarding rare RAS gene variants and forms of the disease with wild-type RAS.

Related

  1. Cost-Effectiveness of Daraxonrasib vs Chemotherapy in Previously Treated Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
    S. Han, N. Starasvetskaya, G. Terrero +2
    medRxivPreprintCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthmedRxiv
  2. Combined halp and GRIm scores for risk stratification in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
    Berkay Yeşilyurt, Ismet Seven, Fahriye Tuğba Köş
    Future OncologyPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textOncologyPMC
  3. Exceptionally Durable Response to First-Line S-1 Monotherapy in Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Case Report
    Takayuki Ota, Shoji Iinuma, Yosuke Suyama
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Surufatinib and camrelizumab plus nab-paclitaxel–gemcitabine as first-line treatment for metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a retrospective cohort study
    Yudong Yuan, Dongdong Zhang, Yuying Li +1
    Frontiers in PharmacologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Pharmacology & toxicologyFrontiersCrossref
  5. Staging laparoscopy for radiographically non-metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: cytology-driven upstaging and the SENDAI-SL risk-enrichment score
    Daisuke Douchi, Shingo Yoshimachi, Naoki Rikiyama +13
    BJS OpenPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textOncologyPMC
BibTeX
@article{gierulska2026efficacy,
  title = {{Efficacy and Safety of Daraxonrasib (RMC-6236) in Previously Treated Metastatic RAS-Mutated Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Systematic Review.}},
  author = {Natalia Gierulska and Nina Jankowska and Zuzanna Dąbrowska and Julia Piekarz and Magdalena Skórzewska},
  journal = {Cancers},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.3390/cancers18193112},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42882807},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Efficacy and Safety of Daraxonrasib (RMC-6236) in Previously Treated Metastatic RAS-Mutated Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Systematic Review.
AU  - Natalia Gierulska
AU  - Nina Jankowska
AU  - Zuzanna Dąbrowska
AU  - Julia Piekarz
AU  - Magdalena Skórzewska
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/25
JO  - Cancers
DO  - 10.3390/cancers18193112
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42882807
AB  - Introduction: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is associated with a poor prognosis, and RAS gene mutations are present in more than 90% of cases. For this reason, direct RAS inhibition is a promising, but thus far difficult to achieve, therapeutic strategy. Daraxonrasib (RMC-6236) is a first-in-class, oral, non-covalent, multiselective inhibitor of the active form of RAS. It forms an intracellular trimeric complex with cyclophilin A, blocking both mutant and wild-type variants of the KRAS, NRAS, and HRAS genes. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of daraxonrasib in previously treated patients with RAS-mutated PDAC. Methods: This review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov for studies published between January 2020 and July 2026. Two studies met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed: the Phase 1-2 RMC-6236-001 (n = 168) and the Phase 3 RASolute 302 trial (n = 500), involving a total of 668 patients. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool for the randomized trial and the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) tool. Results: In the RASolute 302 trial, daraxonrasib out performed investigator-selected chemotherapy in a population of patients with the RAS G12 mutation, improving median overall survival (13.2 vs. 6.6 months; HR 0.40), progression-free survival (7.3 vs. 3.5 months; HR 0.45), and objective response rate (33.2% vs. 11.8%; all p < 0.001), and also delayed the onset of pain and deterioration in quality of life. These results were consistent with the earlier RMC-6236-001 study (objective response rate [ORR] 35%, median overall survival [OS] 13.1 months in patients with RAS G12 mutation treated in the second-line setting). Daraxonrasib exhibited a predictable toxicity profile, consisting mainly of Grade 1-2 dermatologic and gastrointestinal symptoms, with lower rates of hematologic toxicity and treatment discontinuation than with chemotherapy. Conclusions: Daraxonrasib demonstrates clinically relevant and statistically significant efficacy with an acceptable safety profile in previously treated patients with metastatic RAS G12-mutated PDAC, the population for which the strongest randomized evidence is currently available. These findings support its potential as a promising new treatment option in this setting. Further studies are needed regarding rare RAS gene variants and forms of the disease with wild-type RAS.
SN  - 2072-6694
ER  -