Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,839 studies31 sourcesUpdated 35 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Regret-Optimal Linear-Quadratic Control under Distributional Drift

Abstract

We study finite-horizon LQR with independent disturbances whose laws may drift over time. We address uncertainty in this evolution through ex-ante distributionally robust regret optimization (DRRO), which minimizes worst-case excess expected cost relative to the optimal causal controller that knows the law sequence. To specify the admissible law sequences, we introduce a temporally coupled moment ambiguity set with a Gelbrich kinetic-energy budget and a second budget limiting departures from reference moments and persistent cumulative mismatch. Despite the coupling of moments across time, affine disturbance-feedback synthesis reduces exactly to a semidefinite program. An optimal policy uses past disturbances to predict the correction to nominal LQR determined by current and future disturbance means. The SDP solution also yields worst-case moment paths and corresponding laws. For standard distributionally robust optimization (DRO), the analogous SDP relaxation can have a duality gap. Portfolio liquidation experiments show substantially lower worst-case regret over the drifting ambiguity set than common-law DRRO and nominal control.

Related

  1. Ergodic Linear-Quadratic Optimal Control with Stochastic Coefficients
    Xuyang Lin, Nizar Touzi
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlProbabilityarXiv
  2. Turnpike Properties for Exploratory Stochastic Linear-Quadratic Optimal Control with Indefinite Cost Functionals
    Yaohua Hu, Zhaoqing Li, Hanxiao Wang +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  3. A Newton--Kleinman Iteration for Infinite-Dimensional Linear-Quadratic Optimal Control
    Timo Reis
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  4. Sub-Infinite Horizon Stochastic Linear-Quadratic Optimal Control Problems and Delayed Backward Riccati Equations
    Yutao Chen, Hongwei Lou, Hanxiao Wang
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  5. Quantum algorithms for optimal control: large-scale finite-horizon linear-quadratic regulation
    Xiajie Huang, Cristina Álvarez Yuste, Nikita Guseynov +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{fiechtner2026regretoptimal,
  title = {{Regret-Optimal Linear-Quadratic Control under Distributional Drift}},
  author = {Lukas-Benedikt Fiechtner and Jose Blanchet},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.09220},
  eprint = {2610.09220},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.09220},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Regret-Optimal Linear-Quadratic Control under Distributional Drift
AU  - Lukas-Benedikt Fiechtner
AU  - Jose Blanchet
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/06
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.09220
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.09220
AB  - We study finite-horizon LQR with independent disturbances whose laws may drift over time. We address uncertainty in this evolution through ex-ante distributionally robust regret optimization (DRRO), which minimizes worst-case excess expected cost relative to the optimal causal controller that knows the law sequence. To specify the admissible law sequences, we introduce a temporally coupled moment ambiguity set with a Gelbrich kinetic-energy budget and a second budget limiting departures from reference moments and persistent cumulative mismatch. Despite the coupling of moments across time, affine disturbance-feedback synthesis reduces exactly to a semidefinite program. An optimal policy uses past disturbances to predict the correction to nominal LQR determined by current and future disturbance means. The SDP solution also yields worst-case moment paths and corresponding laws. For standard distributionally robust optimization (DRO), the analogous SDP relaxation can have a duality gap. Portfolio liquidation experiments show substantially lower worst-case regret over the drifting ambiguity set than common-law DRRO and nominal control.
ER  -