Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 49 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Physics Informed Random Feature Neural Networks for Solving PDEs

Abstract

Machine learning-based partial differential equations (PDEs) solvers have attracted significant attention in recent years. Most progress in this area has been driven by deep neural networks such as physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) and kernel method (such as physics-informed Gaussian Processes). We introduce a physics-informed random feature method for countering part of the spectral bias which PINN-based solvers are facing for a certain class of PDEs. Random feature method was originally proposed to approximate large-scale kernel machines and can be viewed as a specialized randomized neural network. Compared to other state-of-the-art PINN-based solvers which require a large number of collocation points, our proposed method reduces the computational complexity. In this paper, we develop a rigorous approximation error analysis and derive high-probability error bounds on the H1 norm. We provide extensive numerical tests for verifying our theoretical guarantees on error decay rates, as well as several comparison tests to showcase our claimed capability for combating spectral bias in these deep learning based methods.

Related

  1. Solving Fredholm Integral Equations with Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Single-and double-network approaches
    Mathieu Fabre, Laurence Grammont, Youcef Mammeri
    HALPreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Full textGeneral mathematicsHAL
  2. Boosted Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Solving Homogeneous and Non-Homogeneous Lane-Emden Type Equations
    Luke Oluwaseye Joel
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGalaxiesMathematical physicsarXiv
  3. Solving the Nonlinear Westervelt Equation in Ultrasound Propagation Using Physics-Informed Neural Networks
    Luke Oluwaseye Joel
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
  4. A Framework Integrating the Dynamic Stiffness Matrix with Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Solving Eigenvalue Problems and Analysing Dynamic Response
    Yi An, Zhijiang Chen, Zhiqiang Feng +4
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textNumerical analysis & scientific computingComputational physicsarXiv
  5. Feature tracking in physics-informed neural networks via joint optimization of nonlinear deformation manifolds: application to shocks
    Akshay Thakur, Matthew Zahr
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textStatisticsComputational physicsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{chen2026physics,
  title = {{Physics Informed Random Feature Neural Networks for Solving PDEs}},
  author = {Chi-An Chen and Chunyang Liao and Ming Zhong},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.16406},
  eprint = {2609.16406},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.16406},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Physics Informed Random Feature Neural Networks for Solving PDEs
AU  - Chi-An Chen
AU  - Chunyang Liao
AU  - Ming Zhong
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/14
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.16406
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.16406
AB  - Machine learning-based partial differential equations (PDEs) solvers have attracted significant attention in recent years. Most progress in this area has been driven by deep neural networks such as physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) and kernel method (such as physics-informed Gaussian Processes). We introduce a physics-informed random feature method for countering part of the spectral bias which PINN-based solvers are facing for a certain class of PDEs. Random feature method was originally proposed to approximate large-scale kernel machines and can be viewed as a specialized randomized neural network. Compared to other state-of-the-art PINN-based solvers which require a large number of collocation points, our proposed method reduces the computational complexity. In this paper, we develop a rigorous approximation error analysis and derive high-probability error bounds on the H^1 norm. We provide extensive numerical tests for verifying our theoretical guarantees on error decay rates, as well as several comparison tests to showcase our claimed capability for combating spectral bias in these deep learning based methods.
ER  -