Intermittency-induced transitions in fast-slow dynamical systems
Abstract
Intermittent dynamics are ubiquitous in the Earth system and often arise from the interaction of processes evolving on different time scales. In this work, we investigate how intermittent bursts in a fast forcing system propagate to and reshape the dynamics of a slower response system that would otherwise settle onto a quasi-stationary or weakly oscillatory regime. We address this question in two coupled models of increasing complexity: a low-dimensional Lorenz-63 system and the spatially extended Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation. Across both systems, intermittency in the forcing progressively reshapes the attractor of the slow response system and drives it into different regimes. Using the Wasserstein distance, we show that increasing the frequency of intermittent events progressively displaces the response attractor from its unperturbed counterpart, up to a limit beyond which this deviation saturates. We then show that varying the forcing intensity and the time-scale separation between the forcing and response systems drives distinct regime transitions, which we characterize through the variance of ensemble maxima, the power spectra of both systems, and extreme value statistics. Finally, we examine how the type of intermittency in the forcing system affects synchronization between the two systems through local phase locking, showing that specific transitions in the phase-locking behavior are tied to the underlying intermittency regime, and that the response delay scales exponentially with the time-scale separation.
Related
- Digital Twins of Networked Dynamical Systems: Machine Learning Prediction of Synchronization Transitions in Coupled Chaotic Oscillators
- First-order integrability-breaking phase transitions in dynamical systems
- Nonlinearity-induced Topological Phase Transitions in One-dimensional Systems with Chiral Symmetry: A Real-Space Treatment
- Requirement-Induced Predictive Geometry for Finite-Resource Prediction in Dynamical Systems
- Slow Context, Fast Symptoms: Multiscale Temporal Dynamics and Context-Induced Coupling in Psychological Systems
BibTeX
@misc{barone2026intermittencyinduced,
title = {{Intermittency-induced transitions in fast-slow dynamical systems}},
author = {Alessandro Barone and Alberto Carrassi and Jonathan Demaeyer and Stephane Vannitsem},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.25513},
eprint = {2609.25513},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.25513},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Intermittency-induced transitions in fast-slow dynamical systems
AU - Alessandro Barone
AU - Alberto Carrassi
AU - Jonathan Demaeyer
AU - Stephane Vannitsem
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/22
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.25513
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.25513
AB - Intermittent dynamics are ubiquitous in the Earth system and often arise from the interaction of processes evolving on different time scales. In this work, we investigate how intermittent bursts in a fast forcing system propagate to and reshape the dynamics of a slower response system that would otherwise settle onto a quasi-stationary or weakly oscillatory regime. We address this question in two coupled models of increasing complexity: a low-dimensional Lorenz-63 system and the spatially extended Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation. Across both systems, intermittency in the forcing progressively reshapes the attractor of the slow response system and drives it into different regimes. Using the Wasserstein distance, we show that increasing the frequency of intermittent events progressively displaces the response attractor from its unperturbed counterpart, up to a limit beyond which this deviation saturates. We then show that varying the forcing intensity and the time-scale separation between the forcing and response systems drives distinct regime transitions, which we characterize through the variance of ensemble maxima, the power spectra of both systems, and extreme value statistics. Finally, we examine how the type of intermittency in the forcing system affects synchronization between the two systems through local phase locking, showing that specific transitions in the phase-locking behavior are tied to the underlying intermittency regime, and that the response delay scales exponentially with the time-scale separation.
ER -