Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 55 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0PsyArXiv

Bringing developmental science closer to families: Caregivers’ and professionals’ perspectives on participation in early childhood research

Abstract

Developmental research has historically underrepresented families experiencing psychosocial adversity, partly due to barriers posed by in-person laboratory paradigms. Online, webcam-based methods may support more inclusive research, but their design must be informed by the communities they seek to include. Four focus groups were conducted with caregivers of young children (n = 10) and professionals from child protection, health, and education settings (n = 12), exploring barriers and facilitators to participation, and attitudes toward online data collection. Transcripts were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis, with participant resonance checks. Families expressed concerns about privacy and the use of children’s images, while professionals described hypervigilance towards authority among multi-challenged families. Developmental feedback and resources were valued over financial incentives, and online participation was viewed favourably, conditional on material and researcher support. Inclusive developmental science requires moving closer to families’ spaces and priorities, for instance by running studies in places families already use.

Related

  1. Online gaming for autistic youth: Exploring the impact on participation from the perspectives of autistic adolescents and their caregivers.
    Maya Hayden-Evans, Tahlia Inkster, Isabella Fimmano +4
    Australian occupational therapy journalPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textNeuroscienceEurope PMC
  2. Work participation in inborn errors of immunity: The dual burden on patients and caregivers.
    Federica Pulvirenti, Mayla Sgrulletti, Klara Radovic +8
    Journal of human immunityPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textImmunologyEurope PMC
  3. ATP1A3 dysfunction alters excitability and developmental trajectory of human neurons in alternating hemiplegia of childhood
    C. H. Thompson, C. Q. Simmons, S. A. Wafa +1
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  4. Perspectives and experiences of youth and caregivers on screening and monitoring islet autoimmunity
    Mia Majstorovic, Kelly J. McGorm, John M. Wentworth +10
    Frontiers in EndocrinologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGenetics & genomicsCrossrefEurope PMCPMCEurope PMC
  5. The precarious nature of musical encounters in healthcare: An ethnographic multi-case study focusing on the perspectives of care professionals and musicians
    Monique Bussmann, Marieke Groot, Chris Kuiper +1
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeurosciencePLOS
BibTeX
@misc{portugal2026bringing,
  title = {{Bringing developmental science closer to families: Caregivers’ and professionals’ perspectives on participation in early childhood research}},
  author = {Ana Maria Portugal and Eugénia Ribeiro and Marlene Sousa and Isabel Soares and Adriana Sampaio},
  howpublished = {PsyArXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.31234/osf.io/fyuqp_v1},
  url = {https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/fyuqp_v1/},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Bringing developmental science closer to families: Caregivers’ and professionals’ perspectives on participation in early childhood research
AU  - Ana Maria Portugal
AU  - Eugénia Ribeiro
AU  - Marlene Sousa
AU  - Isabel Soares
AU  - Adriana Sampaio
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/02
PB  - PsyArXiv
DO  - 10.31234/osf.io/fyuqp_v1
UR  - https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/fyuqp_v1/
AB  - Developmental research has historically underrepresented families experiencing psychosocial adversity, partly due to barriers posed by in-person laboratory paradigms. Online, webcam-based methods may support more inclusive research, but their design must be informed by the communities they seek to include. Four focus groups were conducted with caregivers of young children (n = 10) and professionals from child protection, health, and education settings (n = 12), exploring barriers and facilitators to participation, and attitudes toward online data collection. Transcripts were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis, with participant resonance checks. Families expressed concerns about privacy and the use of children’s images, while professionals described hypervigilance towards authority among multi-challenged families. Developmental feedback and resources were valued over financial incentives, and online participation was viewed favourably, conditional on material and researcher support. Inclusive developmental science requires moving closer to families’ spaces and priorities, for instance by running studies in places families already use.
ER  -