Structure Function Sampling Uncertainty: A Gaussian-Increment Reference Framework

Abstract

Structure functions (SFs) are widely used to characterize scale-dependent variability in geophysical fields, but their sampling uncertainty is difficult to quantify because pairwise increments are generally dependent. Dependence arises from both shared observations and spatial covariance of the underlying field, so pair counts alone do not determine uncertainty. The sampling variance is governed by covariance among increment powers, termed structure-function contributions (SFCs). For the second-order SF, a Gaussian-increment closure expresses SFC covariance in terms of the SF itself, allowing fractional sampling variance to be calculated from a specified second-order model and sampling geometry. For regular one-dimensional sampling with a finite integral SFC correlation scale, the well-resolved, long-record limit gives approximately one effective degree of freedom per correlation scale sampled. The dependence of this scale on separation yields simple uncertainty scalings for finite-scale and scale-free models. In particular, for spectra near k⁻², the fractional standard error scales as the inverse square root of the number of separation-length intervals sampled. Sampling variance can be used to construct approximate confidence intervals, while cross-scale covariance allows uncertainty to be propagated to derived quantities such as scaling exponents. Departures from the Gaussian reference enter through an additional fourth-order cumulant contribution that is more difficult to quantify. The Gaussian result thus provides a tractable baseline that explicitly accounts for sampling geometry and spatial dependence.

Threshold Sensitivity and Reference Uncertainty in Sentinel-1 Inundation Mapping: The July 2021 Mahad Flood
Shreyas Khobragade, Kamraan Mulani, Diksha Varekar
EarthArXiv30 Oct 2026PreprintPublisher termsFull textEnvironmental science & pollution Geology & geochemistryEarthArXiv
Low-rank tensor structure of precipitation and its application to satellite-reference merging
Ryan Solgi, Rohan Shankar, Hugo A. Loaiciga
arXiv7 Oct 2026PreprintarXiv licenceFull textAtmospheric science & meteorologyarXiv
Explainable and Uncertainty-Aware Computational Geodetic Inversion: A Review and Framework for Multi-Source Earth Observation
MOHIT SHEODE, Kishan D.
EarthArXiv30 Oct 2026PreprintCC BY-NC 4.0Full textGeophysics & seismologyEarthArXiv
Uncertainty-aware bilevel energy storage planning for active distribution networks: A fixed-topology DistFlow-based MISOCP framework with voltage-security assessment
Zhenhua Miao, Ziyan Li, Yongjie Wang
PLOS One9 Oct 2026Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeology & geochemistry PhysiologyPLOS
Lignocellulose-based hydrogels for environmental remediation: Structure-function relationships, adsorption mechanism, and pathways towards sustainable water treatment
Yaksha Verma, Hao Zhan, Jayati Sharma +7
Carbohydrate Polymer Technologies and Applications3 Jun 2026Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND6 citedHydrology & soilsOpenAlex

Cite

BibTeX RIS

BibTeX

@misc{shcherbina2026structure,
  title = {{Structure Function Sampling Uncertainty: A Gaussian-Increment Reference Framework}},
  author = {Andrey Y. Shcherbina},
  howpublished = {EarthArXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.31223/x5jb8v},
  url = {https://eartharxiv.org/repository/view/15784/},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}

RIS

TY  - UNPB
TI  - Structure Function Sampling Uncertainty: A Gaussian-Increment Reference Framework
AU  - Andrey Y. Shcherbina
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/29
PB  - EarthArXiv
DO  - 10.31223/x5jb8v
UR  - https://eartharxiv.org/repository/view/15784/
AB  - Structure functions (SFs) are widely used to characterize scale-dependent variability in geophysical fields, but their sampling uncertainty is difficult to quantify because pairwise increments are generally dependent. Dependence arises from both shared observations and spatial covariance of the underlying field, so pair counts alone do not determine uncertainty. The sampling variance is governed by covariance among increment powers, termed structure-function contributions (SFCs). For the second-order SF, a Gaussian-increment closure expresses SFC covariance in terms of the SF itself, allowing fractional sampling variance to be calculated from a specified second-order model and sampling geometry. For regular one-dimensional sampling with a finite integral SFC correlation scale, the well-resolved, long-record limit gives approximately one effective degree of freedom per correlation scale sampled. The dependence of this scale on separation yields simple uncertainty scalings for finite-scale and scale-free models. In particular, for spectra near k^−2, the fractional standard error scales as the inverse square root of the number of separation-length intervals sampled. Sampling variance can be used to construct approximate confidence intervals, while cross-scale covariance allows uncertainty to be propagated to derived quantities such as scaling exponents. Departures from the Gaussian reference enter through an additional fourth-order cumulant contribution that is more difficult to quantify. The Gaussian result thus provides a tractable baseline that explicitly accounts for sampling geometry and spatial dependence.
ER  -

Abstract

Related

Cite