Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 3 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0arXiv

Maximum likelihood, neural networks and posterior mean for inferring fractional Brownian motion parameters

Abstract

Fractional Brownian motion (fBM) is a model of anomalous diffusion parameterised by a Hurst exponent H ∈ (0,1) and a generalised diffusion coefficient DH > 0. We jointly estimate H and DH using maximum likelihood (MLE) from density measurements with Poisson counting noise and single-particle trajectory with Gaussian localisation error. We show that one density measurement in time cannot infer both H and DH and that several time points are needed, which matters most for inference precision. For trajectories, we show that a neural network trained with a squared error loss approximates the posterior mean of H, which can be computed exactly at negligible cost. Paired with the profile-likelihood estimate of DH, the posterior mean has the lowest root mean squared error in both H and DH, except near H=0 and H=1 where MLE estimates H better. In vesicle trajectories from two cell types, H and DH form a continuum rather than distinct modes of motion. The posterior probability that each window within a track is subdiffusive or superdiffusive shows that 26% of MRC5 fibroblast and 21% of HeLa vesicle trajectories contain both subdiffusive and superdiffusive windows, against 2% and 7% expected from estimation uncertainty alone. Intracellular cargoes therefore switch between subdiffusion and superdiffusion over time rather than forming populations with fixed H.

Related

  1. Petimot: A Novel Framework for Inferring Protein Motions from Sparse Data Using SE(3)-Equivariant Graph Neural Networks
    Valentin Lombard, Julien Nguyen Van, Sergei Grudinin +1
    Acta crystallographica Section D : Structural biology [1993-...]Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full text1 citedBioinformatics & computational biologyHAL
  2. Inferring causal networks for genomic trios with high-dimensional confounding variables
    Jarred M Kvamme, Audrey Qiuyan Fu
    Briefings in BioinformaticsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGenetics & genomicsPMC
  3. A likelihood-based framework for simultaneously learning both noise and growth dynamics using biologically-informed neural networks
    Rebecca M. Crossley, Ruth E. Baker
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textBioinformatics & computational biologyEvolutionary biologyarXiv
  4. Inferring gene regulatory networks from single-cell perturbation data by optimizing causal reach of latent mediator dynamics
    W. Qian, Y. Song, J. D. Welch
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textBioinformatics & computational biologybioRxiv
  5. Differential resting-state functional connectivity of anterior and posterior cerebellar divisions with canonical networks in PTSD
    LeeAnne Tunstall, Nick Steele, Ahmed Hussain +25
    Journal of Mood and Anxiety DisordersPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeuroscienceDOAJEurope PMCEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@misc{han2026maximum,
  title = {{Maximum likelihood, neural networks and posterior mean for inferring fractional Brownian motion parameters}},
  author = {Daniel S. Han and Vaishnavi Ananthanarayanan and Matthew J. Simpson},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.19888},
  eprint = {2610.19888},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.19888},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Maximum likelihood, neural networks and posterior mean for inferring fractional Brownian motion parameters
AU  - Daniel S. Han
AU  - Vaishnavi Ananthanarayanan
AU  - Matthew J. Simpson
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/14
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.19888
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.19888
AB  - Fractional Brownian motion (fBM) is a model of anomalous diffusion parameterised by a Hurst exponent H ∈ (0,1) and a generalised diffusion coefficient D_H > 0. We jointly estimate H and D_H using maximum likelihood (MLE) from density measurements with Poisson counting noise and single-particle trajectory with Gaussian localisation error. We show that one density measurement in time cannot infer both H and D_H and that several time points are needed, which matters most for inference precision. For trajectories, we show that a neural network trained with a squared error loss approximates the posterior mean of H, which can be computed exactly at negligible cost. Paired with the profile-likelihood estimate of D_H, the posterior mean has the lowest root mean squared error in both H and D_H, except near H=0 and H=1 where MLE estimates H better. In vesicle trajectories from two cell types, H and D_H form a continuum rather than distinct modes of motion. The posterior probability that each window within a track is subdiffusive or superdiffusive shows that 26% of MRC5 fibroblast and 21% of HeLa vesicle trajectories contain both subdiffusive and superdiffusive windows, against 2% and 7% expected from estimation uncertainty alone. Intracellular cargoes therefore switch between subdiffusion and superdiffusion over time rather than forming populations with fixed H.
ER  -