Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 38 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Classical Algorithms for Function Computation in Gaussian Boson Sampling

Abstract

Gaussian boson sampling (GBS) seeks quantum advantage by sampling photon-number patterns generated with squeezed inputs and passive linear optics. Many proposed GBS applications instead target function computation by applying functions to mode-resolved photon-number outcomes---a natural form of experimental postprocessing that produces classical outputs. Sampling hardness alone, however, does not determine the complexity of these tasks. By analyzing the irreducible decomposition of fixed-photon-number operator spaces, we prove that the expectation value of every such function in the average case over passive linear-optical networks can be classically evaluated for inputs with finite squeezing strength. We also provide a classical algorithm that estimates this value to inverse-polynomial additive error. The result provides new theoretical tools for analyzing linear-optical quantum systems, helps clarify the origin of current GBS hardness evidence, and inspires new applications of GBS with genuine quantum advantages.

Related

  1. Encoding universal quantum computation into quantized Berry phases: Hardness results and classical algorithms
    Kazuki Sakamoto, Keisuke Fujii
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  2. Classical Simulation of Lossy Gaussian Boson Sampling beyond Square-Root Regime
    Youngrong Lim
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  3. A Topology-Aware Quantum-Classical Framework for Multi-Target Active Debris Removal using Gaussian Boson Sampling
    Komal Pandya, Saiyam Sakhuja, Nagaraj Kattaian
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  4. Efficient quantum Gibbs sampling of stabilizer codes using hybrid computation
    Ivan Shum, Ángela Capel
    New Journal of PhysicsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textAtomic, molecular & optical physicsCrossref
  5. HTM: A Hybrid Classical-Quantum Computation Model
    Guoqiang Shu, Zongjiang Yi, Jinyang Yao +4
    arXivPreprintCC0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{dou2026classical,
  title = {{Classical Algorithms for Function Computation in Gaussian Boson Sampling}},
  author = {Ruoting Dou and Hao Zhan and Shengjun Wu and Lijian Zhang and Penghui Yao},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.38882},
  eprint = {2609.38882},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.38882},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Classical Algorithms for Function Computation in Gaussian Boson Sampling
AU  - Ruoting Dou
AU  - Hao Zhan
AU  - Shengjun Wu
AU  - Lijian Zhang
AU  - Penghui Yao
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/30
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.38882
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.38882
AB  - Gaussian boson sampling (GBS) seeks quantum advantage by sampling photon-number patterns generated with squeezed inputs and passive linear optics. Many proposed GBS applications instead target function computation by applying functions to mode-resolved photon-number outcomes---a natural form of experimental postprocessing that produces classical outputs. Sampling hardness alone, however, does not determine the complexity of these tasks. By analyzing the irreducible decomposition of fixed-photon-number operator spaces, we prove that the expectation value of every such function in the average case over passive linear-optical networks can be classically evaluated for inputs with finite squeezing strength. We also provide a classical algorithm that estimates this value to inverse-polynomial additive error. The result provides new theoretical tools for analyzing linear-optical quantum systems, helps clarify the origin of current GBS hardness evidence, and inspires new applications of GBS with genuine quantum advantages.
ER  -