Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,851 studies31 sourcesUpdated 38 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NCAsian Journal of Medical Sciences

Crossword puzzles versus multiple-choice questions as assessment tools in physiology: A counterbalanced comparative study among phase I MBBS students

  1. 1Professor and Head, Department of Physiology, Kamineni Institute of Medical Sciences, Nalgonda, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
  2. 2Professor, Department of Physiology, Kamineni Institute of Medical Sciences, Nalgonda, Telangana, India
  3. 3Professor, Department of Physiology, Bhaskar Medical College, Hyderabad, Telangana, India

Abstract

Background: Competency-based medical education requires assessment strategies that both support learning and measure achievement. Multiple-choice questions (MCQs) are reliable and scalable, whereas crossword puzzles may foster active retrieval, learner participation, and immediate identification of knowledge gaps. Aims and Objectives: This study aimed to compare student performance in MCQ and crossword-based physiology assessments and evaluate learner perceptions of the two formats. Materials and Methods: A single-center, counterbalanced, repeated measures comparative study was conducted among Phase I MBBS students in Telangana, India (October–December 2025). Two physiology topics were assessed using MCQs and crosswords 1 week apart in opposite sequences. Both formats were derived from identical learning objectives and faculty-reviewed blueprints, though item-level matching for cognitive level or psychometric difficulty was not performed. Assessments were formative and excluded from summative decisions. Paired data were available for 140 students (transport across the cell membrane) and 126 students (hemoglobin and red blood cells). Perceptions were collected using a validated 10-item Likert questionnaire, yielding 266 topic-level responses. Results: For transport across the cell membrane, mean MCQ scores were 10.76±2.95/20 (53.8±14.8%), whereas crossword scores were 8.18±2.94/18 (45.4±16.3%), with a significant paired difference (P<0.001). For hemoglobin and red blood cells, MCQ and crossword scores (9.36±0.98 vs. 9.58±0.90/10) showed no significant difference (P=0.065). Feedback indicated strong acceptance: 82% found crosswords more interesting, 82% reported deeper thinking, 84% felt motivated to review, and 77% viewed both formats as complementary. Conclusion: Crossword puzzles were well received and demonstrated potential as engaging formative tools in physiology. Their effectiveness varied by topic, suggesting they should complement rather than replace MCQs within multimodal assessment frameworks.

Related

  1. Quality, Readability, Understandability, and Actionability of AI Chatbots’ Responses to Dental Patient Questions: A Comparative Evaluation
    Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. OP–249 A comparative evaluation of artificial intelligence models for adolescent-centered scoliosis questions
    Esra Rabia Taşpolat, Ebru Kübra Taşpolat, Tuba Sarıkaya +2
    BMJ Paediatrics OpenPeer-reviewedCC BYObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsDOAJ
  3. How well do large language models answer postoperative lumbar fusion questions? A blinded comparative analysis of accuracy, quality, readability, and safety-related content
    Ahmet Kürşat Kara, Ozan Işık
    Frontiers in surgeryPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  4. Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Preoperative Assessment: From Exercise Physiology to Personalized Perioperative Care
    Carlo Vignati, Piergiuseppe Agostoni, Beatrice Pezzuto
    Journal of cardiovascular development and diseasePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textCardiovascular medicineEurope PMC
  5. Benchmarking the performance of large language models on medical genetics questions: a comparative evaluation of GPT-5.1, Gemini Pro 3, and Claude Opus 4.5.
    Muserref Basdemirci, Melek Tassoker
    Frontiers in medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull text1 citedEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@article{bai2026crossword,
  title = {{Crossword puzzles versus multiple-choice questions as assessment tools in physiology: A counterbalanced comparative study among phase I MBBS students}},
  author = {Ambika Bai JN and Rajani Shanthakumari and Massarat Begum},
  journal = {Asian Journal of Medical Sciences},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.71152/ajms.v17i11.5602},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.71152/ajms.v17i11.5602},
  note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Crossword puzzles versus multiple-choice questions as assessment tools in physiology: A counterbalanced comparative study among phase I MBBS students
AU  - Ambika Bai JN
AU  - Rajani Shanthakumari
AU  - Massarat Begum
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/01
JO  - Asian Journal of Medical Sciences
DO  - 10.71152/ajms.v17i11.5602
UR  - https://doi.org/10.71152/ajms.v17i11.5602
AB  - Background: Competency-based medical education requires assessment strategies that both support learning and measure achievement. Multiple-choice questions (MCQs) are reliable and scalable, whereas crossword puzzles may foster active retrieval, learner participation, and immediate identification of knowledge gaps. Aims and Objectives: This study aimed to compare student performance in MCQ and crossword-based physiology assessments and evaluate learner perceptions of the two formats. Materials and Methods: A single-center, counterbalanced, repeated measures comparative study was conducted among Phase I MBBS students in Telangana, India (October–December 2025). Two physiology topics were assessed using MCQs and crosswords 1 week apart in opposite sequences. Both formats were derived from identical learning objectives and faculty-reviewed blueprints, though item-level matching for cognitive level or psychometric difficulty was not performed. Assessments were formative and excluded from summative decisions. Paired data were available for 140 students (transport across the cell membrane) and 126 students (hemoglobin and red blood cells). Perceptions were collected using a validated 10-item Likert questionnaire, yielding 266 topic-level responses. Results: For transport across the cell membrane, mean MCQ scores were 10.76±2.95/20 (53.8±14.8%), whereas crossword scores were 8.18±2.94/18 (45.4±16.3%), with a significant paired difference (P<0.001). For hemoglobin and red blood cells, MCQ and crossword scores (9.36±0.98 vs. 9.58±0.90/10) showed no significant difference (P=0.065). Feedback indicated strong acceptance: 82% found crosswords more interesting, 82% reported deeper thinking, 84% felt motivated to review, and 77% viewed both formats as complementary. Conclusion: Crossword puzzles were well received and demonstrated potential as engaging formative tools in physiology. Their effectiveness varied by topic, suggesting they should complement rather than replace MCQs within multimodal assessment frameworks.
SN  - 2467-9100
SN  - 2091-0576
ER  -