Peer-reviewedCC BYDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
Quality, Readability, Understandability, and Actionability of AI Chatbots’ Responses to Dental Patient Questions: A Comparative Evaluation
Related
- Comparative evaluation of large language models for esophageal cancer patient education: quality, reliability, readability, understandability, and actionability.
- Quality and Readability of ChatGPT and Gemini Responses to Patient Questions About Systemic Isotretinoin: Comparative Evaluation Study.
- Comparative Evaluation of Large Language Model Interfaces in Third Molar Surgery Complication Scenarios: Response Quality, Clinical Content, Potential Clinical Risk, Readability, and Externally Observable Response Latency—A Cross-Sectional Comparative Benchmark Study
- Quality, transparency, and readability of artificial intelligence chatbot responses to fibrous dysplasia-related searches: a cross-sectional comparative study
- Quality and readability of responses generated by popular large language models to frequently asked questions about menopause: A comparative study
BibTeX
@article{anon2026quality,
title = {{Quality, Readability, Understandability, and Actionability of AI Chatbots’ Responses to Dental Patient Questions: A Comparative Evaluation}},
journal = {Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13703409},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Quality, Readability, Understandability, and Actionability of AI Chatbots’ Responses to Dental Patient Questions: A Comparative Evaluation
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/01
JO - Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13703409
SN - 2075-4418
ER -