A Novel Intraluminal Microtube Anastomosis System (IMAS) for Rapid Rat Microvascular Reconstruction: Development and Experimental Evaluation
- 1Department of Surgery, Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Seoul 01757, Republic of Korea
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Conventional interrupted microvascular anastomosis is technically demanding and time-consuming. We developed an intraluminal microtube anastomosis system (IMAS) in which circumferential anchoring ridges on the outer surface mechanically retain each arterial end while two external circumferential ligatures secure the reconstruction. This study compared IMAS with conventional interrupted microsurgical anastomosis in a rat infrarenal abdominal aortic model. Methods: Forty male Sprague Dawley rats (250–300 g) were allocated to IMAS (n = 20) or conventional interrupted microsurgical anastomosis (n = 20). Random-sequence generation and allocation concealment were handled by an animal-experiment assistant. All formal procedures were performed by the same surgeon, who was proficient in conventional microsuturing and had completed 10 pilot IMAS procedures before the study. Anastomosis time was measured from complete aortic transection to restoration of flow after clamp removal. Patency was assessed at 1 week and 1 month by color Doppler ultrasonography, with terminal gross examination at 1 month. The study was exploratory and was not powered as a patency non-inferiority or equivalence study. Results: Mean anastomosis time was 5 min 30 s ± 60 s with IMAS and 20 min 32 s ± 75 s with conventional suturing (p < 0.001). The between-group mean difference (conventional minus IMAS) was 902 s (95% CI, 859–945 s), corresponding to an approximately 73% reduction. Patency was 19/20 (95%) in both groups at 1 week (p = 1.000) and 18/20 (90%) in both groups at 1 month (p = 1.000). No gross device migration, aneurysmal dilatation, or anastomotic leakage was observed in patent IMAS-treated vessels at necropsy. Conclusions: In this exploratory rat model, IMAS substantially shortened reconstruction time. The observed short-term patency proportions were the same in the two groups, but the study was not sufficiently powered to establish equivalence or non-inferiority in patency. Histological response, lumen stenosis, quantitative flow, mechanical strength, material biocompatibility, and longer-term outcomes require further evaluation.
Related
- Bone Resorption After Microvascular Osseous Free-Flap Reconstruction in Pediatric Patients: A Retrospective Study
- Microvascular Reconstruction in Ballistic Injuries of the Maxillofacial Region
- Outcomes of sequential microvascular tissue transfer for radiation induced sequelae post mandibular reconstruction
- Comparison of a Novel Intracorporeal Anastomosis Versus Extracorporeal Anastomosis for Colon Cancer: A Propensity Score–Weighted, Prospective Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment, Long-term Stage 2b Cohort Study
- Quantitative perfusion analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the preoperative prediction of microvascular invasion: an experimental study in rabbit VX2 liver tumors.
BibTeX
@article{yoon2026novel,
title = {{A Novel Intraluminal Microtube Anastomosis System (IMAS) for Rapid Rat Microvascular Reconstruction: Development and Experimental Evaluation}},
author = {Sam-Youl Yoon},
journal = {Journal of Clinical Medicine},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3390/jcm15218277},
url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/21/8277},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - A Novel Intraluminal Microtube Anastomosis System (IMAS) for Rapid Rat Microvascular Reconstruction: Development and Experimental Evaluation
AU - Sam-Youl Yoon
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/24
JO - Journal of Clinical Medicine
DO - 10.3390/jcm15218277
UR - https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/21/8277
AB - Background/Objectives: Conventional interrupted microvascular anastomosis is technically demanding and time-consuming. We developed an intraluminal microtube anastomosis system (IMAS) in which circumferential anchoring ridges on the outer surface mechanically retain each arterial end while two external circumferential ligatures secure the reconstruction. This study compared IMAS with conventional interrupted microsurgical anastomosis in a rat infrarenal abdominal aortic model. Methods: Forty male Sprague Dawley rats (250–300 g) were allocated to IMAS (n = 20) or conventional interrupted microsurgical anastomosis (n = 20). Random-sequence generation and allocation concealment were handled by an animal-experiment assistant. All formal procedures were performed by the same surgeon, who was proficient in conventional microsuturing and had completed 10 pilot IMAS procedures before the study. Anastomosis time was measured from complete aortic transection to restoration of flow after clamp removal. Patency was assessed at 1 week and 1 month by color Doppler ultrasonography, with terminal gross examination at 1 month. The study was exploratory and was not powered as a patency non-inferiority or equivalence study. Results: Mean anastomosis time was 5 min 30 s ± 60 s with IMAS and 20 min 32 s ± 75 s with conventional suturing (p < 0.001). The between-group mean difference (conventional minus IMAS) was 902 s (95% CI, 859–945 s), corresponding to an approximately 73% reduction. Patency was 19/20 (95%) in both groups at 1 week (p = 1.000) and 18/20 (90%) in both groups at 1 month (p = 1.000). No gross device migration, aneurysmal dilatation, or anastomotic leakage was observed in patent IMAS-treated vessels at necropsy. Conclusions: In this exploratory rat model, IMAS substantially shortened reconstruction time. The observed short-term patency proportions were the same in the two groups, but the study was not sufficiently powered to establish equivalence or non-inferiority in patency. Histological response, lumen stenosis, quantitative flow, mechanical strength, material biocompatibility, and longer-term outcomes require further evaluation.
SN - 2077-0383
ER -