Peer-reviewedCC BYJMIR medical informatics
Patient-Provider Distance in Medicare Outpatient Oncology Telehealth Versus Office Visits, 2021-2023: Cross-Sectional Claims Analysis.
8 affiliations
- 1Thrust of Urban Governance and Design, Society Hub, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou), Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
- 2Center for Geographic Analysis, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States.
- 3Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.
- 4Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.
- 5Department of Biomedical Data Science, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, United States.
- 6The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, United States.
- 7Dartmouth Cancer Center, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, United States.
- 8Department of Geography, University of Hong Kong, 10F, The Jockey Club Tower, Centennial Campus, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong), 852 391-02256.
Abstract
Unlabelled
In a cross-sectional analysis of traditional Medicare Fee-For-Service beneficiaries aged 66 years or older with outpatient oncology-related encounters, we found that telehealth modestly extended patient-provider geographic reach but largely operated within existing office-based catchments and preserved rural-urban distance gradients. Equitable telehealth policy should target patients with high travel burden while supporting digital access, navigation, and cross-jurisdiction continuity.
Related
- Exploring patient and provider perspectives on outpatient care and the family practice model at a university hospital in Ghana
- Telehealth acceptance and challenges among healthcare providers in the management of chronic conditions in Palestine: a cross-sectional study
- Real-world antidepressant prescribing patterns in outpatient care: a cross-sectional analysis
- Prescription-Duration Patterns of Outpatient Macrolide Use in Participating Community Pharmacies in Tokyo, Japan: A 24-Month Repeated Cross-Sectional Study
- Cardiovascular risk profile and treatment patterns in patients with type 2 diabetes in specialized cardiology outpatient care in Colombia : A retrospective cross-sectional study
BibTeX
@article{liu2026patientprovider,
title = {{Patient-Provider Distance in Medicare Outpatient Oncology Telehealth Versus Office Visits, 2021-2023: Cross-Sectional Claims Analysis.}},
author = {Lingbo Liu and Tracy Onega and Erika L Moen and Anna N A Tosteson and Rebecca E Smith and Qianfei Wang and Lauren Cowan and Fahui Wang},
journal = {JMIR medical informatics},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.2196/95370},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42913396},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Patient-Provider Distance in Medicare Outpatient Oncology Telehealth Versus Office Visits, 2021-2023: Cross-Sectional Claims Analysis.
AU - Lingbo Liu
AU - Tracy Onega
AU - Erika L Moen
AU - Anna N A Tosteson
AU - Rebecca E Smith
AU - Qianfei Wang
AU - Lauren Cowan
AU - Fahui Wang
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/23
JO - JMIR medical informatics
DO - 10.2196/95370
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42913396
AB - Unlabelled In a cross-sectional analysis of traditional Medicare Fee-For-Service beneficiaries aged 66 years or older with outpatient oncology-related encounters, we found that telehealth modestly extended patient-provider geographic reach but largely operated within existing office-based catchments and preserved rural-urban distance gradients. Equitable telehealth policy should target patients with high travel burden while supporting digital access, navigation, and cross-jurisdiction continuity.
SN - 2291-9694
ER -