Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,086 studies31 sourcesUpdated just now
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Molecules

Cellulose Crystallinity in Orange Biomass-Derived Cellulose: Comparative Assessment by FT-IR, Solid-State 13C NMR, and X-Ray Diffraction

  1. 1Laboratory of Biological Chemistry (LQB), Institute of Chemistry, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas 13083-970, SP, Brazil
  2. 2Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia Farroupilha (IFFar), Alegrete 97555-000, RS, Brazil

Abstract

Reliable determination of cellulose crystallinity is essential for biomass valorization, yet commonly used analytical methods may respond differently to residual non-cellulosic components present in partially purified lignocellulosic materials. In this study, fourteen cellulose-rich samples were produced from depectinated orange biomass under controlled alkaline processing conditions and characterized by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), solid-state 13C nuclear magnetic resonance (CP/MAS 13C NMR), and X-ray diffraction (XRD). Crystallinity indices (CIs) were calculated using the lateral order index (FT-IR), C4 peak deconvolution (ssNMR), and the Segal method (XRD), while principal component analysis was employed to support multivariate interpretation of the FT-IR and NMR datasets. FT-IR-derived CIs ranged from approximately 65 to 91%, with the starting biomass exhibiting the highest value despite its substantial residual pectin content. In contrast, ssNMR-derived CIs were consistently lower (approximately 27–49%) and showed limited sensitivity to residual pectin, indicating greater selectivity toward cellulose crystalline organization. XRD produced intermediate CI values and displayed a moderate positive correlation with ssNMR (r = 0.5) but a moderate negative correlation with FT-IR (r = −0.5). PCA further revealed that pectin-associated FT-IR bands (~1737 and ~1635 cm−1) were the primary drivers separating the starting biomass from the purified cellulose samples. The study establishes a practical framework for selecting crystallinity evaluation methods during the sustainable valorization of citrus biomass into cellulose-based materials.

Related

  1. Comparative Investigation of NaOH and KOH Treatments for Cellulose Purity and Polymorph Control in Pineapple Leaf Fibers: Crystallinity Changes and Electrochemical Impedance Signatures
    G. Malika Madushani Dissanayaka, K. G. Chathuranga Senarathna, K. M. Kanishka Sampath Jayasingha
    ACS OmegaPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textMaterials & polymersCrossref
  2. Bio-based cellulose-filled vitrimers for 3D printing via liquid deposition modeling: Rheological tuning and environmental assessment
    Edoardo Albertini, Mirko Busto, Sara Dalle Vacche +3
    Chemical Engineering JournalPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full text2 citedGeneral chemistryHAL
  3. Comparative Performance of Stearoyl Chloride-Modified Cellulose Sponges from Five Lignocellulosic Wastes for Oil/Water Separation
    Emrecan Arpaci, Sami Imamoglu
    PolymersPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Materials & polymersCrossref
  4. Polymer Brush-Mediated Surface-Initiated Polycondensation Enables sp2C-COF Thin Films with Controlled Crystallinity and High Photocatalytic Performance
    Lingjie He, Wuxin Zhang, Yuxiang Zhao +7
    Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textMaterials & polymersCrossref
  5. Comparative dielectric and physicochemical assessment of surfactant-free TiO2 and SiO2 nanofluids for high voltage transformer mineral oil
    Meshari S. Alshammari, Ahmed I. Omar, Basma Eltlhawy +2
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textMaterials & polymersCrossref
BibTeX
@article{castro2026cellulose,
  title = {{Cellulose Crystallinity in Orange Biomass-Derived Cellulose: Comparative Assessment by FT-IR, Solid-State 13C NMR, and X-Ray Diffraction}},
  author = {Symone Costa de Castro and Matheus Signorelli Corrêa and Ljubica Tasic},
  journal = {Molecules},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/molecules31213833},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/31/21/3833},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Cellulose Crystallinity in Orange Biomass-Derived Cellulose: Comparative Assessment by FT-IR, Solid-State 13C NMR, and X-Ray Diffraction
AU  - Symone Costa de Castro
AU  - Matheus Signorelli Corrêa
AU  - Ljubica Tasic
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/23
JO  - Molecules
DO  - 10.3390/molecules31213833
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/31/21/3833
AB  - Reliable determination of cellulose crystallinity is essential for biomass valorization, yet commonly used analytical methods may respond differently to residual non-cellulosic components present in partially purified lignocellulosic materials. In this study, fourteen cellulose-rich samples were produced from depectinated orange biomass under controlled alkaline processing conditions and characterized by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), solid-state 13C nuclear magnetic resonance (CP/MAS 13C NMR), and X-ray diffraction (XRD). Crystallinity indices (CIs) were calculated using the lateral order index (FT-IR), C4 peak deconvolution (ssNMR), and the Segal method (XRD), while principal component analysis was employed to support multivariate interpretation of the FT-IR and NMR datasets. FT-IR-derived CIs ranged from approximately 65 to 91%, with the starting biomass exhibiting the highest value despite its substantial residual pectin content. In contrast, ssNMR-derived CIs were consistently lower (approximately 27–49%) and showed limited sensitivity to residual pectin, indicating greater selectivity toward cellulose crystalline organization. XRD produced intermediate CI values and displayed a moderate positive correlation with ssNMR (r = 0.5) but a moderate negative correlation with FT-IR (r = −0.5). PCA further revealed that pectin-associated FT-IR bands (~1737 and ~1635 cm−1) were the primary drivers separating the starting biomass from the purified cellulose samples. The study establishes a practical framework for selecting crystallinity evaluation methods during the sustainable valorization of citrus biomass into cellulose-based materials.
SN  - 1420-3049
ER  -