Patients', Relatives' and Healthcare Professionals' Experiences and Perceptions of Raising Concerns About Acute Deterioration: A Qualitative Case Study
- 1School of Nursing & Midwifery Queen's University Belfast, Medical Biology Centre Belfast UK
- 2School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences Wellcome‐Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast Belfast UK
Abstract
Aim: To explore adult patients', relatives', and healthcare professionals' experiences of acute deterioration and perceptions of patient/family involvement in raising concerns.
Design: A collective case study underpinned by implementation science.
Methods: Individual and focus group semi‐structured interviews were conducted with patients, relatives and healthcare professionals who had experience of deterioration across two urban hospitals. The interview schedule was informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change and a concurrent review of patient notes was undertaken to contextualise the deterioration experience. Data was analysed using thematic analysis.
Findings: Between March and October 2019, 12 patients, 11 relatives, and 32 healthcare professionals were interviewed. Findings revealed that patients and relatives can detect deterioration, and they highlighted challenges and benefits in their involvement in raising concerns. Perspectives from all stakeholders highlighted an urgent need to provide better support and mechanisms for patients and relatives in escalating deterioration. These include the need to co‐design innovative interventions that focus on informing patients/relatives of the main signs of deterioration, key steps to take when calling for help, and their role in the process.
Conclusion: Understanding the perceived challenges and benefits of patient and family‐initiated care escalation provides a strong theoretical and practical foundation for designing and implementing an effective intervention.
Impact: The findings highlight key processes and intervention components essential for developing a patient and family‐initiated escalation of care intervention.
Implications for the Profession and/or Patient Care: This insight will support the co‐design and implementation planning of an intervention aimed at preventing or reducing deterioration by empowering patients and their families to escalate concerns.
Reporting Method: The COREQ checklist was used as a guide for reporting the study.
Patient or Public Contribution: Patients, relatives and healthcare professionals were involved in the co‐design of the study.
Related
- Experiences of healthcare professionals of delivering rehabilitation in specialist services for people with persistent physical symptoms: a qualitative study
- Microarray patches as a potential alternative to injectable fertility medications: a qualitative study of patients’ and healthcare professionals’ perceptions
- Experiences towards endometriosis management: A qualitative study among patients and healthcare professionals
- Experiences of Healthcare Professionals in Home Based-Caring for Children With Type 1-Diabetes in Vulnerable Positions: A Qualitative Study.
- Navigating failed induction of labor within maternity care systems: a qualitative study of women’s experiences and healthcare professionals’ perspectives
BibTeX
@article{mckinney2026patients,
title = {{Patients', Relatives' and Healthcare Professionals' Experiences and Perceptions of Raising Concerns About Acute Deterioration: A Qualitative Case Study}},
author = {Aidín McKinney and Donna Fitzsimons and Bronagh Blackwood and Jennifer McGaughey},
journal = {Journal of Advanced Nursing},
year = {2026},
month = jul,
doi = {10.1111/jan.70669},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.70669},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Patients', Relatives' and Healthcare Professionals' Experiences and Perceptions of Raising Concerns About Acute Deterioration: A Qualitative Case Study
AU - Aidín McKinney
AU - Donna Fitzsimons
AU - Bronagh Blackwood
AU - Jennifer McGaughey
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/07/08
JO - Journal of Advanced Nursing
DO - 10.1111/jan.70669
UR - https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.70669
AB - Aim: To explore adult patients', relatives', and healthcare professionals' experiences of acute deterioration and perceptions of patient/family involvement in raising concerns. Design: A collective case study underpinned by implementation science. Methods: Individual and focus group semi‐structured interviews were conducted with patients, relatives and healthcare professionals who had experience of deterioration across two urban hospitals. The interview schedule was informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change and a concurrent review of patient notes was undertaken to contextualise the deterioration experience. Data was analysed using thematic analysis. Findings: Between March and October 2019, 12 patients, 11 relatives, and 32 healthcare professionals were interviewed. Findings revealed that patients and relatives can detect deterioration, and they highlighted challenges and benefits in their involvement in raising concerns. Perspectives from all stakeholders highlighted an urgent need to provide better support and mechanisms for patients and relatives in escalating deterioration. These include the need to co‐design innovative interventions that focus on informing patients/relatives of the main signs of deterioration, key steps to take when calling for help, and their role in the process. Conclusion: Understanding the perceived challenges and benefits of patient and family‐initiated care escalation provides a strong theoretical and practical foundation for designing and implementing an effective intervention. Impact: The findings highlight key processes and intervention components essential for developing a patient and family‐initiated escalation of care intervention. Implications for the Profession and/or Patient Care: This insight will support the co‐design and implementation planning of an intervention aimed at preventing or reducing deterioration by empowering patients and their families to escalate concerns. Reporting Method: The COREQ checklist was used as a guide for reporting the study. Patient or Public Contribution: Patients, relatives and healthcare professionals were involved in the co‐design of the study.
SN - 0309-2402
SN - 1365-2648
ER -