Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 49 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYFrontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences

Effects of ankle-foot orthosis stiffness on lower-limb joint work during various movement tasks in people with calf muscle weakness—an explorative study

  1. 1Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands
  2. 2Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
  3. 3Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Rehabilitation and Development, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Abstract

BackgroundSpring-like ankle–foot orthoses (AFOs) are provided to people with calf muscle weakness to improve mobility by supporting ankle push-off. During walking, a higher AFO stiffness reduces ankle work. However, other movement tasks pose other demands on the AFO. In this explorative study, we aimed to determine whether AFO presence and stiffness influence lower-limb joint-work differently during gait initiation, obstacle crossing, and step-up in individuals with calf muscle weakness.MethodsSeven participants with bilateral calf muscle weakness performed gait initiation, obstacle crossing, and step-up movements in a shoes-only condition and five AFO stiffness conditions (2.8–6.6 Nm/◦). Outcomes included forward and upward impulse, and (relative) positive lower-limb joint work. Trial-level linear mixed-effects models were used for analyses, with false discovery rate correction to account for multiple testing.ResultsCompared with shoes-only, wearing an AFO (2.8 Nm/◦) did not affect forward or upward impulse. Absolute ankle and knee work reduced, while the relative contribution of knee work reduced and hip work increased when using an AFO. No interaction between using an AFO and movement task was found. Increasing AFO stiffness reduced absolute and relative positive ankle work (q < 0.001), while no effects on impulses nor on knee or hip work were found. Impulse and joint work significantly differed between movements, but no interaction stiffness-by-movement task interaction was found.ConclusionOur explorative study indicates that an AFO of 2.8 Nm/◦ and increasing AFO stiffness further reduce absolute ankle work while no effect on impulse was found. For relative joint work our results indicate that an interaction might exist, where the effect of increasing AFO stiffness is more pronounced in activities with relatively higher ankle power demands.

Related

  1. Cross-bridge model for predicting muscle short-range stiffness during movement
    Tim J. van der Zee, Surabhi N. Simha, Gregory N. Milburn +3
    PLOS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPhysiologyPLOS
  2. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation paired with a 3D-printed ankle-foot orthosis for ankle-foot dysfunction among older adults following subacute stroke: clinical findings and exploratory neurophysiological analyses
    Yuting Zhang, Hehe Chen, Rui Xu +3
    Frontiers in NeurologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeurologyCrossrefPMC
  3. Sexual experience of urostomy patients with bladder cancer: a qualitative explorative study
    Haomin Tian, Xiaojuan Han
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaDOAJ
  4. C5-Predominant Segmental Zoster Paresis Presenting With Right Shoulder Abduction Weakness Before Cutaneous Eruption: A Case Report
    Ryo Miyakawa, Yu Matsui, Tadamichi Shimizu
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Inter-rater agreement of a pathophysiology-derived clinical assessment tool for complex regional pain syndrome type I in physiotherapy: an explorative study.
    Jasmin Erni, Evelyn Baertschi, Juergen Degenfellner +2
    BMC musculoskeletal disordersPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMCDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{roelfsema2026effects,
  title = {{Effects of ankle-foot orthosis stiffness on lower-limb joint work during various movement tasks in people with calf muscle weakness—an explorative study}},
  author = {Jack R. Roelfsema and Jack R. Roelfsema and Winfred Mugge and Niels F. J. Waterval and Niels F. J. Waterval},
  journal = {Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fresc.2026.1994258},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2026.1994258},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Effects of ankle-foot orthosis stiffness on lower-limb joint work during various movement tasks in people with calf muscle weakness—an explorative study
AU  - Jack R. Roelfsema
AU  - Jack R. Roelfsema
AU  - Winfred Mugge
AU  - Niels F. J. Waterval
AU  - Niels F. J. Waterval
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/27
JO  - Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences
DO  - 10.3389/fresc.2026.1994258
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2026.1994258
AB  - BackgroundSpring-like ankle–foot orthoses (AFOs) are provided to people with calf muscle weakness to improve mobility by supporting ankle push-off. During walking, a higher AFO stiffness reduces ankle work. However, other movement tasks pose other demands on the AFO. In this explorative study, we aimed to determine whether AFO presence and stiffness influence lower-limb joint-work differently during gait initiation, obstacle crossing, and step-up in individuals with calf muscle weakness.MethodsSeven participants with bilateral calf muscle weakness performed gait initiation, obstacle crossing, and step-up movements in a shoes-only condition and five AFO stiffness conditions (2.8–6.6 Nm/◦). Outcomes included forward and upward impulse, and (relative) positive lower-limb joint work. Trial-level linear mixed-effects models were used for analyses, with false discovery rate correction to account for multiple testing.ResultsCompared with shoes-only, wearing an AFO (2.8 Nm/◦) did not affect forward or upward impulse. Absolute ankle and knee work reduced, while the relative contribution of knee work reduced and hip work increased when using an AFO. No interaction between using an AFO and movement task was found. Increasing AFO stiffness reduced absolute and relative positive ankle work (q < 0.001), while no effects on impulses nor on knee or hip work were found. Impulse and joint work significantly differed between movements, but no interaction stiffness-by-movement task interaction was found.ConclusionOur explorative study indicates that an AFO of 2.8 Nm/◦ and increasing AFO stiffness further reduce absolute ankle work while no effect on impulse was found. For relative joint work our results indicate that an interaction might exist, where the effect of increasing AFO stiffness is more pronounced in activities with relatively higher ankle power demands.
SN  - 2673-6861
ER  -