Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,335 studies31 sourcesUpdated 42 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Methodological Assessment of Instrumented Indentation for Spatially Resolved Mesoscale Stiffness and Creep in Short Fiber-Reinforced Injection-Molded PBT Components

Abstract

Instrumented indentation enables assessment of local mechanical properties in heterogeneous polymer systems, but specimen preparation and the selected indentation protocol significantly influence the quantitative interpretation of the measured response. This study develops and evaluates an experimental methodology for spatially resolved mesoscale characterization of both unreinforced and short fiber-reinforced composites. An unreinforced material system is used as a reference material to systematically examine the effects of indentation spacing, surface preparation, maximum indentation load, temporal loading parameters, and unloading evaluation. Indentation loads of 500, 1000, and 1750 mN are investigated in complementary experimental campaigns. The apparent indentation modulus exhibits moderate sensitivity to indentation load and loading time within the studied ranges. In contrast, indentation depth and the creep-related depth increment display greater sensitivity to the applied load history. Surface polishing minimizes topographical disturbances and enables reliable identification of residual indentation profiles and pile-up. Based on these methodological findings, a final load-hold-unload protocol with an indentation load of 1750 mN, a loading time of 6 s, a holding period of 300 s, and an unloading time of 4 s is applied to both unreinforced material and short fiber-reinforced composites. The mean apparent indentation modulus increases from 2.91 GPa for unreinforced material to 6.65 GPa for short fiber-reinforced composites, while the mean depth of indentation creep decreases from 2.36 to 1.91 microns. The coefficient of variation also increases for both quantities, indicating that short-fiber reinforcement enhances mean local stiffness and introduces pronounced spatial heterogeneity in both stiffness-related and time-dependent mesoscale indentation responses.

Related

  1. Cone-beam CT-based synthetic CT generation for adaptive radiotherapy: methodological paradigms, clinical reliability assessment, and translation
    Yunxian Zhang, Wanting Zhang, Jinbai Huang +4
    Frontiers in OncologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textApplied physics & instrumentationCrossrefEurope PMC
  2. Variations in the Contribution of Fluid Pressurization to Compressive Muscle Stiffness from Local to Global Indentation
    Benjamin Wheatley, Christian Pierre-Yves Rohan
    Multidisciplinary Biomechanics JournalPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral physicsHAL
  3. An ultrasound-assisted indentation method to characterize the leg-orthosis interface
    Elisa Jolas, Nolwenn Fougeron, Sacha Guitteny +5
    Multidisciplinary Biomechanics JournalPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral physicsHAL
  4. Nondestructive 3D Quantification of the Magnitude and Extent of Indentation-Induced Densification in Glass
    Sang-min Lee, Dohyeon Lee, Juheon Lee +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptics & photonicsarXiv
  5. Estimation of Cyclist Control Actions: A Minimally Instrumented and Modular Approach via Direct Collocation
    Jules Ronné, Jason Moore
    Multidisciplinary Biomechanics JournalPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral physicsHAL
BibTeX
@misc{klatt2026methodological,
  title = {{Methodological Assessment of Instrumented Indentation for Spatially Resolved Mesoscale Stiffness and Creep in Short Fiber-Reinforced Injection-Molded PBT Components}},
  author = {Eduard Klatt and Natalie Rauter},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2611.04707},
  eprint = {2611.04707},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.04707},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Methodological Assessment of Instrumented Indentation for Spatially Resolved Mesoscale Stiffness and Creep in Short Fiber-Reinforced Injection-Molded PBT Components
AU  - Eduard Klatt
AU  - Natalie Rauter
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/03
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2611.04707
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.04707
AB  - Instrumented indentation enables assessment of local mechanical properties in heterogeneous polymer systems, but specimen preparation and the selected indentation protocol significantly influence the quantitative interpretation of the measured response. This study develops and evaluates an experimental methodology for spatially resolved mesoscale characterization of both unreinforced and short fiber-reinforced composites. An unreinforced material system is used as a reference material to systematically examine the effects of indentation spacing, surface preparation, maximum indentation load, temporal loading parameters, and unloading evaluation. Indentation loads of 500, 1000, and 1750 mN are investigated in complementary experimental campaigns. The apparent indentation modulus exhibits moderate sensitivity to indentation load and loading time within the studied ranges. In contrast, indentation depth and the creep-related depth increment display greater sensitivity to the applied load history. Surface polishing minimizes topographical disturbances and enables reliable identification of residual indentation profiles and pile-up. Based on these methodological findings, a final load-hold-unload protocol with an indentation load of 1750 mN, a loading time of 6 s, a holding period of 300 s, and an unloading time of 4 s is applied to both unreinforced material and short fiber-reinforced composites. The mean apparent indentation modulus increases from 2.91 GPa for unreinforced material to 6.65 GPa for short fiber-reinforced composites, while the mean depth of indentation creep decreases from 2.36 to 1.91 microns. The coefficient of variation also increases for both quantities, indicating that short-fiber reinforcement enhances mean local stiffness and introduces pronounced spatial heterogeneity in both stiffness-related and time-dependent mesoscale indentation responses.
ER  -